Julia Nantke’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Fig. 1: A letter from the Vincent van Gogh Letters edition
Fig. 2: A FRBR OO -based ontology for the editable and edition domains. The concepts in red are the FRBR OO classes, the concepts and relations in black are subclasses defined in the edition annotation ontology.
Fig. 3: A semantic description of the van Gogh letter as abstract work (middle) and the Dutch transcription (left) and English translation (right) using the Van Gogh Annotation ontology
Annotations in Scholarly Editions and Research
  • Book
  • Full-text available

October 2020

·

1,143 Reads

·

4 Citations

Julia Nantke

·

Frederik Schlupkothen

·

Manuel Bamert

·

[...]

·

Ruggero Sciuto

Reading notes in books and other printed matter are of increasing interest in Philology and Cultural History. However, we still lack an understanding of their epistemic foundations. With reference to Thomas Mann’s private library, I suggest viewing the act of annotating with pens itself as an epistemic practice. For this, I introduce the term ‘pen traces’ for all phenomena left behind by pens, and distinguish between four different forms of knowledge that influence their emergence: the knowledge of readers, the knowledge of authors, textual knowledge and contextual knowledge. By shedding light on pen traces as traces of an epistemic practice, finally, I point out the need for a practice theory of annotation.

Download

Citations (1)


... Previous studies have highlighted these challenges in scholarly annotations. Nantke and Schlupkothen [1] provided a comprehensive analysis of the complexity of annotation practices in scholarly editions, while Howlett and Turner [2] demonstrated how inconsistent terminology across disciplines affects research discoverability. Larivière et al. [3] and Devriendt et al. [4] revealed significant challenges researchers face in standardizing contribution descriptions and receiving proper recognition across different platforms and domains. ...

Reference:

ORKGEx: Leveraging Language and Vision Models with Knowledge Graphs for Research Contribution Annotation
Annotations in Scholarly Editions and Research