Joshua H. Siegle’s research while affiliated with Allen Institute for Brain Science and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (83)


Foundry-fabricated dual-color nanophotonic neural probes for photostimulation and electrophysiological recording
  • Article

March 2025

·

8 Reads

Neurophotonics

·

Fu-Der Chen

·

John Straguzzi

·

[...]

·

Wesley D. Sacher

Significance Compact tools capable of delivering multicolor optogenetic stimulation to deep tissue targets with sufficient span, spatiotemporal resolution, and optical power remain challenging to realize. Here, we demonstrate foundry-fabricated nanophotonic neural probes for blue and red photostimulation and electrophysiological recording, which use a combination of spatial multiplexing and on-shank wavelength demultiplexing to increase the number of on-shank emitters. Aim We demonstrate silicon (Si) photonic neural probes with 26 photonic channels and 26 recording sites, which were fabricated on 200-mm diameter wafers at a commercial Si photonics foundry. Each photonic channel consists of an on-shank demultiplexer and separate grating coupler emitters for blue and red light, for a total of 52 emitters. Approach We evaluate neural probe functionality through bench measurements and in vivo experiments by photostimulating through 16 of the available 26 emitter pairs. Results We report neural probe electrode impedances, optical transmission, and beam profiles. We validated a packaged neural probe in optogenetic experiments with mice sensitive to blue or red photostimulation. Conclusions Our foundry-fabricated nanophotonic neural probe demonstrates dense dual-color emitter integration on a single shank for targeted photostimulation. Given its two emission wavelengths, high emitter density, and long site span, this probe will facilitate experiments involving bidirectional circuit manipulations across both shallow and deep structures simultaneously.



Relative timing and coupling of neural population bursts in large-scale recordings from multiple neuron populations
  • Preprint
  • File available

February 2025

·

14 Reads

The onset of a sensory stimulus elicits transient bursts of activity in neural populations, which are presumed to convey information about the stimulus to downstream populations. The time at which these synchronized bursts reach their peak is highly variable across stimulus presentations, but the relative timing of bursts across interconnected brain regions may be less variable, especially for regions that are strongly functionally coupled. We developed a simple analytical framework that obtains good estimates of population burst times on a trial-by-trial basis, and of the correlations in the timing of evoked population bursts across areas. We show that this method performs well on simulated data, and is 85 to 90% faster than an alternative, recently-published method while also being much easier to apply. Using this new approach, we examined the relative timing of the first two population bursts following the onset of a drifting grating stimulus in large-scale recordings of spiking activity from six cortical visual areas and one visual thalamic nucleus in thirteen mice. The new method allowed us to identify mouse-to-mouse variation in peak times and region-to-region functional coupling. While all results were consistent with known anatomy and physiology, we found some sequences of activity across areas to be the same across all mice, while others varied with the individual. The general approach can thus produce sensitive analyses of timing relationships across neural populations. Significant Statement Careful analysis can reveal strong and precisely-timed interactions across multiple brain areas from small populations of spiking neurons. We developed a computationally efficient procedure that allowed us to examine the relative timing and coupling of 7 visual areas (6 cortical and one thalamic) and compare results in over 10 mice. The method can be used to track the flow of information across the brain in response to stimuli or during a behavioral task.

Download

Schematic overview on deciphering variability across time and hierarchy
A Neuronal variability is a combined effect of influences from independent stochastic processes including external sensory factors, behavior, and fluctuations in internal brain states. The resulting neuronal responses exhibit a variable temporal structure across trials and individual neurons. Capturing these temporal dynamics is a challenging problem and lies at the core of understanding the functional role of neuronal variability. B Top: Schematic of the experimental setup. Bottom: Neuropixels probes in six visual cortical areas simultaneously record local field potentials and spiking activity. A retinotopic sign map overlaid on the vasculature image guides area-specific targeting. C Anatomical hierarchy scores of the six visual areas recomputed from ref. ²⁵. Studying variability along the visual hierarchy can reveal important insights about information propagation and encoding at each stage of signal processing.
Properties of internal oscillation states identified from local field potentials in awake behaving mice
A Top: Local field potential (LFP) power modulations in V1 recorded from mice passively viewing a naturalistic movie. Bottom: Time course of running speed and pupil area during the same time period. B Schematic to identify oscillation states using LFPs. Discrete states are defined based on frequency-specific transients of LFPs from six visual areas. Hidden Markov model (HMM) uses Hilbert transforms in the theta (3–8 Hz), beta (10–30 Hz), lower gamma (30–50 Hz), and higher gamma (50–80 Hz) frequency ranges. C Top: Model comparison among HMMs over a range of latent states using three-fold cross-validation. The cross-validated log-likelihood (LL) estimate, normalized by the top eigenvalue of the state definition matrix, is reported for each mouse (hollow circles) along with across-subject averages (solid circles, n = 25 mice, error bars represent s.e.m). For each mouse, the optimal number of states was identified as the point where the normalized LL was maximized. Final model selection was based on the majority rule across all mice. Bottom: Evaluation of state similarity (λ1) as the top eigenvalue of the state definition matrix. D Top: State posterior probabilities identified by the HMM. Bottom: LFPs from randomly selected channels from V1, displayed alongside their respective latent states over the same duration. E LFP power distribution in the three-state model. Shaded lines represent the state-specific z-scored power distributions in individual mice, and the solid black line represent the average across all mice (N = 25 mice). In state-1, or the high-frequency state, LFPs are dominated by high-frequency gamma oscillations. State 3, or the low-frequency state, has characteristic slow oscillations in the theta band. F Histogram of state dwell times in each trial across all states and all mice. G Average probability of observing 3-step or 2-step (inset) transition sequences to different states. Transition probabilities were calculated from observed sequences averaged across all mice (n = 25, error bars represent s.e.m). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Behavioral correlates of the observed oscillation states
A Face motion energy evaluated as the absolute value of the difference between consecutive frames. B Eye and pupil tracking. Tracking points were identified using a universal tracking model trained in DeepLabCut. C Animal pose estimation. Specific, visible body parts were tracked using a universal tracking model trained in SLEAP. D Example snippet of behavioral changes alongside the animal’s current oscillation state. SH: High-frequency state (green), SI: Intermediate state (blue), and SL: Low-frequency state (pink). E Comparison of the average movement of specific body parts across states (pSH,SI,L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I,L}}$$\end{document}, pupil size: p = 2.8e-15, running: p = 2.0e-17, face motion: p = 6.3e-13, body center: p = 2.6e-18, left forelimb: p = 1.2e-13, left hindlimb: p = 4.9e-14, right hindlimb: p = 3.0e-11, tail start:, p = 3.0e-16, tail end: p = 2.0e-11, n = 25 mice, one-way ANOVA). F, Mutual information (MI) between behavioral variables and the inferred HMM states (mean ± sem, n = 25 mice). All statistical tests were performed using one-way ANOVA. Statistical tests in (E, F) were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction (***: p < 0.0001, **: p < 0.001, *: p < 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Neuronal variability and information encoding across states and the visual hierarchy
A Raster plots (~10 s) showing the response of 25 units, each from V1 and AM, during two trials in which the mouse was in different states. Each row represents the activity of the same single neuron across the two trials. SH: High-frequency state (green), SI: Intermediate state (blue), and SL: Low-frequency state (pink). B State and area-specific population activity, z-scored and averaged across all mice (pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document} = 1.4e-05, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 3.0e-07, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 0.90, one-way ANOVA, n = 25 mice). Error bars represent s.e.m. C Average pairwise correlation between averaged neuronal population activity in different visual areas as a function of oscillation states (pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document}  = 1.5, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 0.002, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 0.002, one-way ANOVA, n = 25). Error bars represent s.e.m. D Population shared variance. Top: Separation of shared and independent variance using factor analysis (FA). FA partitions the spike count covariance matrix into shared and independent components. Bottom: Percentage of shared variance plotted against the anatomical hierarchy scores of the visual areas in each oscillation state, averaged across all units (One-way ANOVA: pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document} = 9.6e-7, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 1.3e-146, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 1.2e-95; Two-way ANOVA, states: F   431.2, p = 1.5e − 189, areas: F = 78.8, p = 3.3e − 82, states  × area: F = 3.3, p = 2.6e − 4, n = 7609 units). E Neuronal variability across time, quantified using the coefficient of variation (CV). Top-left: Simulated distributions of inter-spike-intervals (ISI) for regular and Poisson-like firing. For a very regular spike train, a narrow peak in the ISI histogram corresponds to CV ≈ 0, whereas Poisson-like variability in the spike trains leads to an exponentially distributed ISI histogram with CV = 1. Top-right: Distribution of ISIs in each oscillation state over a 2.5 sec range. Bottom: CV along the visual hierarchy (quantified as anatomical hierarchy scores) and across oscillation states, averaged across all units (One-way ANOVA: pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document} = 4.9e-23, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 3.9-03, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 2.8e-11; Two-way ANOVA, states: F = 42.5, p = 3.6e − 19, areas: F = 88.1, p = 4.5e − 92, states × area: F = 4.8, p = 4.9e − 7, n = 7609 units). F Neuronal variability across trials, quantified using Fano factor (FF). Top-left: Evaluation of FF as an average of the FF ratio over non-overlapping windows of 150 ms with at least ten trials in each state. Top-right: Mean spike count versus variance over all times in each state for an example cell in V1. Bottom: FF along the visual hierarchy and across brain states, averaged across all units (One-way ANOVA: pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document} = 2.8e-4, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 2.4e-33, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 3.5e-39; Two-way ANOVA, states: F = 107.7, p = 7.5e − 47, areas: F = 7.1, p = 9.9e − 6, states  × area: F = 0.6, p = 0.8, n = 5017 units). Pearson correlation with hierarchy scores excluding RL, SH: rp−RL = − 0.94, pp−RL = 0.02; SI: rp−RL = −0.43, pp−RL = 0.5; SL: rp−RL = − 0.46, pp−RL = 0.43. G Information encoding along the visual hierarchy across all oscillation states, quantified using mutual information (MI). Top: For each trial, MI was evaluated between the population spike count matrix and a matrix of flattened movie frames at time points corresponding to each state using a matrix-based entropy estimator. Bottom: MI across the visual hierarchy and oscillation states averaged across all mice (Pairwise T-test: pSH,SI\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{I}}$$\end{document} = 0.01, pSH,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{H},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 7.3e-10, pSI,SL\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{{S}_{I},{S}_{L}}$$\end{document} = 9.3e-04; Two-way ANOVA, states: F = 3.1, p = 0.04, areas: F = 2.7, p = 0.03, states  × area: F = 0.02, p = 0.99, n = 25). Pearson correlation with hierarchy scores excluding RL, SH: rp−RL = − 0.9, pp−RL = 0.03; SI: rp−RL = − 0.86, pp−RL = 0.06; SL: rp−RL = − 0.81, pp−RL = 0.09. Error bars in D–G represent 95% confidence intervals. All statistical tests were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction (***: p < 0.0001, **: p < 0.001, *: p < 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Relative contributions of the different sources to single neuron variability
A State-conditioned encoding model to account for state-specific contributions of different sources of variability. Design matrices were constructed using decorrelated features to train state-specific regressors. SH: High-frequency state (green), SI: Intermediate state (blue), and SL: Low-frequency state (pink). B Regression models to study encoding in population and single neuron models. Population models included a linear weighting of the input features, while in single neuron models, linear weighting was followed by a non-linear exponential projection. C–G Results from single-neuron model. C Mean explained variance for different categories of input features, averaged across n = 3923 neurons and obtained using five-fold cross-validation. D (First panel) Neuronal activity, with neurons sorted vertically by a manifold embedding algorithm, Rastermap. (Panels 2–6) Prediction of neuronal activity (n = 350 units, best explained units across mice and areas) from respective input feature categories. E Contributions from single category models to explaining single-neuron variability during different oscillation states (n = 3923 neurons). SH: High-frequency state (green), SI: Intermediate state (blue), and SL: Low-frequency state (pink). F Explained variance of all units in each input feature category. G Neuronal clusters identified through unsupervised clustering of the final explained variance from single-category models for all units. H Distribution of neuronal clusters across areas. I Neuronal clusters derived from unsupervised clustering of state-specific explained variance from single-category models for all units, showing how feature encoding dynamics shift across different oscillatory states. Box-plots in (C, E) show the first and third quartiles, the inner line is the median over all neurons (n = 3923), and the whiskers represent 1.5 × IQR (Tukey method). Statistical tests in (C, E) were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction (***p < 0.0001, **p < 0.001, *p < 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

+1

Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding

February 2025

·

171 Reads

Influenced by non-stationary factors such as brain states and behavior, neurons exhibit substantial response variability even to identical stimuli. However, it remains unclear how their relative impact on neuronal variability evolves over time. To address this question, we designed an encoding model conditioned on latent states to partition variability in the mouse visual cortex across internal brain dynamics, behavior, and external visual stimulus. Applying a hidden Markov model to local field potentials, we consistently identified three distinct oscillation states, each with a unique variability profile. Regression models within each state revealed a dynamic composition of factors influencing spiking variability, with the dominant factor switching within seconds. The state-conditioned regression model uncovered extensive diversity in source contributions across units, varying in accordance with anatomical hierarchy and internal state. This heterogeneity in encoding underscores the importance of partitioning variability over time, particularly when considering the influence of non-stationary factors on sensory processing.


Figure 1 -Design of the prototype Neuropixels Opto probe. a, Cross-section of the Neuropixels Opto shank, showing the titanium nitride (TiN) recording sites (connected with a "via" to the silicon CMOS layer) and the silicon nitride (SiN) photonic waveguides ending in the emitters (grating couplers). b, Layout of recording sites and dual color emitters. c, Photos of a probe shank across four time points, with two red and two blue emitters delivering light in succession. d, Device package. e, Neuropixels Opto system architecture, with PXI modules for data acquisition (white) and light delivery (purple).
Figure 2 -Optical characterization of the Neuropixels Opto probe. a, Efficiency of the emitters, showing output light power as a percentage of input power for 14 red (top) and blue (bottom) emitters from N = 14 probes. Curves show average over probes. b, Top view, showing light propagation from a red and blue emitter, measured in water. The color (color scale in panel d) indicates the max projection. These measurements were made on a test structure where emitters were placed 25 μm apart rather than the 100 μm of the prototype probe (Methods) and this led to small imaging artifacts visible in the red emission (top), where two emitters to the side of the central one also appear to emit light. c, Same data, projected over a side view. d, Same data, projected over a front view. Dashed lines delineate the width of the probe. e, Section on a plane located 52 μm away from the shank, showing areas where power density is >10 mW/mm 2 (for a 100 μW output) for three nearby emitters.
Figure 3 -Using Neuropixels Opto to record and activate localized neural populations. a. We inserted a Neuropixels Opto probe ~1.4 mm deep in the visual cortex of a mouse expressing the red-sensitive opsin ChRmine in cortical excitatory neurons (via a virus with CaMK2 promoter). Mice viewed a visual stimulus, and an additional red laser could illuminate the surface of the posterior cortex. b. Simultaneous Neuropixels Opto recordings and optical stimulation with an example emitter (#11). Recordings (while the screen was gray, with no external laser), show baseline activity 50 ms prior to emitter photostimulation and strong spiking activity after stimulation onset on a subset of recordings sites near emitter 11. c. Average spike waveforms from five example single units recorded on sites near emitter 11. The mean waveform was calculated across 100 spikes. d. Average firing rate (bin size 50 µm, 10 trials) for the same recording session, plotted as a function of depth, showing cortical responses to visual stimulation and surface illumination. Color scale bar appears at the bottom right of the figure. e. Responses of the same neurons to single emitter activations at different depths (arrows). f. Summary of these data showing average over time of response during stimulation with visual stimulus, surface laser, and single emitters (abscissa), at different cortical depths (ordinate). g. Same format, for example sessions in two other mice. Additional measurements in these mice are shown in Supplementary Figure S3.
Figure 5 -Using Neuropixels Opto for optotagging. a, We inserted two Neuropixels Opto probes in the striatum of Adora2a-Cre mice expressing the blue-sensitive opsin CoChR in D1-MSNs (via a D1-MSN specific enhancer virus) and the red-sensitive opsin ChRmine in D2 MSNs (via a Cre-dependent AAV). Mice were free to run on a disc. After 20 min recording we ran the optotagging protocol (10 ms, 20 Hz, 100 µW pulses from each of 14 blue or red emitters, randomly interleaved). b, Recorded traces around the time of stimulation, showing spike times (green and red dots) of two example units tagged by red light from emitter 3. c, Mean waveforms for the two units. d, Spike raster and peri-stimulus time histogram for 50 trials of stimulation from emitter 3, showing consistent, low-latency response to each light pulse. e, Stacked rasters across 50 trials from all 14 emitters for five example units (including the two units from panels b-d). f, Estimated location of all units passing quality control from a single recording, with units activated by blue or red light shown in blue and units activated by red light only shown in red.
Neuropixels Opto: Combining high-resolution electrophysiology and optogenetics

February 2025

·

388 Reads

·

2 Citations

High-resolution extracellular electrophysiology is the gold standard for recording spikes from distributed neural populations, and is especially powerful when combined with optogenetics for manipulation of specific cell types with high temporal resolution. We integrated these approaches into prototype Neuropixels Opto probes, which combine electronic and photonic circuits. These devices pack 960 electrical recording sites and two sets of 14 light emitters onto a 1 cm shank, allowing spatially addressable optogenetic stimulation with blue and red light. In mouse cortex, Neuropixels Opto probes delivered high-quality recordings together with spatially addressable optogenetics, differentially activating or silencing neurons at distinct cortical depths. In mouse striatum and other deep structures, Neuropixels Opto probes delivered efficient optotagging, facilitating the identification of two cell types in parallel. Neuropixels Opto probes represent an unprecedented tool for recording, identifying, and manipulating neuronal populations.


ONIX, a unified open-source platform for unencumbered freely moving recordings
a, Simplified block diagram of the ONI, illustrated via the tetrode headstage: multiple devices all communicate with the host PC over a single micro-coax cable via a serialization protocol, making it possible to design small multi-function headstages. b, The integrated nine-axis absolute orientation sensor and 3D tracking redundantly measure animal rotation, which drives the motorized commutator without the need to measure tether torque, enabling long recording durations. Small drive implants⁴⁴ enable low-profile implants (~20 mm total height). c, The ONIX micro-coax, a 0.31 mm thin tether, compared to standard 12-wire digital tethers. d, Torque exerted on an animal’s head by tethers. Current tethers allow full mobility only in small arenas and in situations when the tether does not pull on the implant, while the ONIX micro-coax applies negligible torque. e, Performance of ONIX: with the 64-channel headstage, a 99.9% worst-case closed-loop latency, from neural voltage reading, to host PC, and back to the headstage (for example to trigger a light-emitting diode (LED)) of <1 ms can be achieved on Windows 10 (see also Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7). FPGA, field-programmable gate array; EIB, electrode interface board; FIFO, first-in first-out buffer.
Unrestricted naturalistic locomotion behavior with ONIX
a, Overview of experiment. Mice were freely exploring a 3D arena made from Styrofoam pieces of varying heights. b, Unimplanted mice and mice with a standard tether (top) or ONIX micro-coax (bottom) were tracked in 3D using multicamera, markerless pose estimation³¹. c, Head yaw and pitch occupancies over the course of a recording. d, Speed distributions over the course of a recording. e, Two-dimensional projection of mouse trajectories over the course of a recording session.
Stable long-term recordings during naturalistic locomotion
a, Position of one 3D-tracking sensor on the headstage during a 7.3-h-long ONIX recording during which the mouse was free to explore the 3D arena. Red trace and excerpt show one of multiple instances of the mouse spontaneously jumping from a lower to a higher tile. b, Video frames of the jump (the tether is too thin to be visible at this magnification), see Supplementary Video 1. c, Raw voltages and spike peak amplitudes from two channels at hour 1 (top) and hour 7 (bottom) of the recording. d, 3D position, heading and smoothed firing rate of entire recording. e, Same data as in d, for excerpt around jump. f, z-position, raw voltage trace example and sorted spikes from 71 neurons during the jump.
ONIX is compatible with existing and future recording technologies
a, ONIX, together with Bonsai, can simultaneously record from and synchronize multiple data sources, such as tetrode headstages, Neuropixels headstages and/or UCLA Miniscopes. b, 64-channel extracellular headstage, as used in Figs. 1–3, with 3D tracking, electrical stimulator (Extended Data Fig. 10), dual-channel LED driver and inertial measurement unit (IMU) (bottom side; not shown) (top). Example neural recording and corresponding 3D-pose traces collected from the headstage (bottom). c, ONIX is compatible with existing UCLA Miniscopes (v.3 and 4)45,55. Maximum projection after background removal of an example recording in mouse CA1 (middle). Background-corrected fluorescence traces (black) and CNMF output (via Minian⁶³, red) of ten example neurons (bottom). d, An ONIX headstage for use with two Neuropixels probes and IMU to enable torque-free commutator use for long-term freely behaving recordings. A voltage heat map shows a segment from a head-fixed recording. A voltage time series from the channel indicated by the dotted line is shown in blue.
ONIX: a unified open-source platform for multimodal neural recording and perturbation during naturalistic behavior

November 2024

·

96 Reads

·

4 Citations

Nature Methods

Behavioral neuroscience faces two conflicting demands: long-duration recordings from large neural populations and unimpeded animal behavior. To meet this challenge we developed ONIX, an open-source data acquisition system with high data throughput (2 GB s⁻¹) and low closed-loop latencies (<1 ms) that uses a 0.3-mm thin tether to minimize behavioral impact. Head position and rotation are tracked in three dimensions and used to drive active commutation without torque measurements. ONIX can acquire data from combinations of passive electrodes, Neuropixels probes, head-mounted microscopes, cameras, three-dimensional trackers and other data sources. We performed uninterrupted, long (~7 h) neural recordings in mice as they traversed complex three-dimensional terrain, and multiday sleep-tracking recordings (~55 h). ONIX enabled exploration with similar mobility as nonimplanted animals, in contrast to conventional tethered systems, which have restricted movement. By combining long recordings with full mobility, our technology will enable progress on questions that require high-quality neural recordings during ethologically grounded behaviors.


Foundry-fabricated dual-color nanophotonic neural probes for photostimulation and electrophysiological recording

September 2024

·

25 Reads

·

2 Citations

Significance: Compact tools capable of delivering multicolor optogenetic stimulation to deep tissue targets with sufficient span, spatiotemporal resolution, and optical power remain challenging to realize. Here, we demonstrate foundry-fabricated nanophotonic neural probes for blue and red photostimulation and electrophysiological recording, which use a combination of spatial multiplexing and on-shank wavelength-demultiplexing to increase the number of on-shank emitters. Aim: We demonstrate Si photonic neural probes with 26 photonic channels and 26 recording sites, which were fabricated on 200-mm diameter wafers at a commercial Si photonics foundry. Each photonic channel consists of an on-shank demultiplexer and separate grating coupler emitters for blue and red light, for a total of 52 emitters. Approach: We evaluate neural probe functionality through bench measurements and in vivo experiments by photostimulating through 16 of the available 26 emitter pairs. Results: We report neural probe electrode impedances, optical transmission, and beam profiles. We validated a packaged neural probe in optogenetic experiments with mice sensitive to blue or red photostimulation. Conclusions: Our foundry-fabricated nanophotonic neural probe demonstrates dense dual-color emitter integration on a single shank for targeted photostimulation. Given its two emission wavelengths, high emitter density, and long site span, this probe will facilitate experiments involving bidirectional circuit manipulations across both shallow and deep structures simultaneously.



Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding

April 2024

·

157 Reads

Influenced by factors such as brain states and behavior, neurons exhibit substantial response variability even to identical stimuli. Because these factors are non-stationary, they dynamically impact the fidelity of sensory processing. However, it remains unclear how their relative impact on neuronal variability evolves over time. To address this question, we designed an encoding model with latent states to partition visual cortical variability across three crucial categories of sources: internal brain dynamics, behavior, and external visual stimulus. Applying a hidden Markov model to the rhythmic patterns of cortical local field potentials, we consistently identified three distinct oscillation states. Each state revealed a unique variability profile and a consistent descending trend of stimulus modulation across the visual hierarchy. Regression models within each state revealed a dynamic composition of factors contributing to the observed spiking variability, with the primary influencing factor switching within seconds. In the state dominated by high-frequency oscillations, sensory inputs and behavior exerted the most influence on population dynamics. Conversely, internal brain activity explained most of the variance in the state dominated by low-frequency oscillations. This heterogeneity across states underscores the importance of partitioning variability over time, particularly when considering the dynamic influence of non-stationary factors on sensory processing.


Pinpoint: trajectory planning for multi-probe electrophysiology and injections in an interactive web-based 3D environment

October 2023

·

4 Reads

·

1 Citation

Targeting deep brain structures during electrophysiology and injections requires intensive training and expertise. Even with experience, researchers often can’t be certain that a probe is placed precisely in a target location and this complexity scales with the number of simultaneous probes used in an experiment. Here, we present Pinpoint, open-source software that allows for interactive exploration of stereotaxic insertion plans. Once an insertion plan is created, Pinpoint allows users to save these online and share them with collaborators. 3D modeling tools allow users to explore their insertions alongside rig and implant hardware and ensure plans are physically possible. Probes in Pinpoint can be linked to electronic micro-manipulators allowing real-time visualization of current brain region targets alongside neural data. In addition, Pinpoint can control manipulators to automate and parallelize the insertion process. Compared to previously available software, Pinpoint’s easy access through web browsers, extensive features, and real-time experiment integration enable more efficient and reproducible recordings.


Citations (55)


... In this work, we present a computational perspective on current knowledge of cortical structure. We do not strive for a detailed account of biophysical properties (Billeh et al. 2020;Dura-Bernal et al. 2023;Arkhipov et al. 2025), and rather aim to provide a description at a level of abstraction that is both grounded in biology and a necessary component for understanding cortical computation at the mechanistic level (Bernáez Timón et al. 2023). We conclude that different cortical cell types map to different functions and computations, and that cortical connectivity can be efficiently recapitulated through canonical connectivity blueprints between cell types. ...

Reference:

Building functional and mechanistic models of cortical computation based on canonical cell type connectivity
Integrating multimodal data to understand cortical circuit architecture and function
  • Citing Article
  • March 2025

Nature Neuroscience

... To mitigate this, many experiments rely on manual intervention by researchers to untangle cables and ensure animal safety or prevent equipment damage (Helmchen et al., 2001;Zong et al., 2022). However, these interruptions can limit naturalistic behavior and disrupt experimentations by introducing behavioral artifacts (Kapanaiah and Kätzel, 2023;Newman et al., 2024;Oladepo et al., 2024). Alternatively, passive, non-motorized commutators, which use flexible, lightweight cables managed by counterweight-pulley systems, are employed (van Daal et al., 2021). ...

ONIX: a unified open-source platform for multimodal neural recording and perturbation during naturalistic behavior

Nature Methods

... In recent years, the need to perform simultaneous multi-area recordings has led neuroscientists to increasingly remove large sections of the dorsal skull to allow optical imaging and access to penetrating neural probes for targeting deep brain regions. The advent of ultra-widefield imaging systems such as the two-photon mesoscopes (1) has prompted research groups to develop surgical approaches to perform very large craniotomies across the dorsal cortex (2)(3)(4)(5) and the cerebellar cortex (6). Once removed, the skull is typically replaced with either curved glass windows (2) or threedimensionally (3D) printed polymer skulls that conform to the morphology of the removed skull (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). ...

SHIELD: Skull-shaped hemispheric implants enabling large-scale electrophysiology datasets in the mouse brain
  • Citing Article
  • July 2024

Neuron

... NeuroCarto supports basic visualization of pre-recorded neural activity along the probe shanks and anatomical data to assist with constructing custom channel maps and planning probe implantation. Similar functionality exists in SpikeGLX and Open-Ephys, either built-in, using a plugin ("Probe Viewer" for Open-Ephys), or through an interface with an external tool for probe trajectory planning ("Pinpoint", Birman et al., 2023). Since SpikeGLX and Open-Ephys are primarily data acquisition software, they can provide a dynamic real-time visualization of neural activity on the probe, rather than the static visualization in NeuroCarto. ...

Pinpoint: trajectory planning for multi-probe electrophysiology and injections in an interactive web-based 3D environment
  • Citing Preprint
  • October 2023

... Electrophysiology overcomes these issues: the temporal resolution is higher, deeper regions are readily accessible, and recordings can be made in freely moving animals. Substantial effort has thus been dedicated to developing devices for chronic electrophysiology recordings (Berényi et al., 2014;Chung et al., 2017;Chung et al., 2019;Ferguson et al., 2009;Ferreira-Fernandes et al., 2023;Newman et al., 2023;Okun et al., 2016;Schoonover et al., 2021;Shobe et al., 2015). But these devices are typically non-recoverable, are too heavy for use in smaller animals like mice, or record relatively few neurons. ...

A unified open-source platform for multimodal neural recording and perturbation during naturalistic behavior

... Efficient encoding not only reduces storage footprint but also directly impacts data access speed-an increasingly critical factor in AI-driven analysis, real-time processing, and cloud-native applications 28 . Although prior studies have reported compression benchmarks in other imaging contexts [29][30][31] , a comprehensive evaluation tailored to HT imaging has not been performed. ...

Compression strategies for large-scale electrophysiology data

... Extracellular multielectrode recordings and spike sorting are among the most essential techniques for investigating neural circuits. Modern high-density, silicon-based probes contain thousands of closely packed microelectrodes, allowing the capture of the simultaneous activity of hundreds of neurons with high spatiotemporal resolution [1][2][3][4] . Since these complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS)-based devices typically have fewer recording channels than physical microelectrodes, only a small subset of electrodes can be used for simultaneous recordings at a time. ...

Ultra-high density electrodes improve detection, yield, and cell type specificity of brain recordings

... We observed a consistent mean displacement from the planned angle in both medio-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) angles (Figure 2f and i , total mean difference in angle from planned: 7.5 degrees). Angle differences can be explained by the different orientations and geometries of the CCF and the stereotaxic coordinate systems, which we have recently resolved in a corrected atlas (Birman et al., 2023 ). The difference in histology angle to planned probe placement was assessed with permutation testing across labs, and shows a p-value of 0.45 (Figure 2i ). ...

Pinpoint: trajectory planning for multi-probe electrophysiology and injections in an interactive web-based 3D environment

... We compared the outputs of model neurons with public two-photon calcium imaging data from the Allen Brain Observatory (de Vries et al., 2023). In particular, we used data recorded from mouse visual cortex while the mice watched 30s natural movie clips. ...

Sharing neurophysiology data from the Allen Brain Observatory
  • Citing Article
  • July 2023

... Second, we have to establish common guidelines for code and data sharing combined with documentation. This requires that we agree on how data should be shared, and much work has already been accomplished in solving this issue [16][17][18] . It also requires that we agree on what data should be shared. ...

Sharing neurophysiology data from the Allen Brain Observatory

eLife