Joseph L. Koszarek’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Knowledge acquisition techniques for group decision support
  • Article

December 1993

·

21 Reads

·

15 Citations

Knowledge Acquisition

John H. Boose

·

·

Joseph L. Koszarek

·

David B. Shema

Existing group decision support systems used in meeting rooms can help teams reach decisions quickly and efficiently. However, the decision models used by these systems are inadequate for many types of problems. This paper describes our laboratory's experience with knowledge acquisition systems and decision support tools. Our studies led us to develop a comprehensive decision model for group decision support systems. This decision model combines current brainstorming-oriented methods, structured text argumentation (using the gIBIS model), repertory grids, possibility tables (morphological charts) and influence diagrams from decision analysis. Each component addresses weaknesses in current group decision support systems. We are assembling these group decision support components together into a group decision workbench.


Better group decisions: using knowledge acquisition techniques to build richer decision models

February 1992

·

10 Reads

·

9 Citations

Existing group decision support systems used in meeting rooms can help teams reach decisions quickly and efficiently. However, the decision models used by these systems are inadequate for many types of problems. The authors describe their laboratory's experience with knowledge acquisition systems and decision support tools. Their studies led them to develop a comprehensive decision model for group decision support systems. This model combines current brainstorming-oriented methods, structured text argumentation (using the gIBIS model), repertory grids, possibility tables (morphological charts), and influence diagrams from decision analysis. Each component addresses weaknesses in current group decision support systems. The authors are assembling these components together into a group decision support workbench

Citations (2)


... In contrast, there is a class of qualitative multi-criteria methods which are characterized by using qualitative variables whose value scales contain a finite predefined set of qualitative (or symbolic, "verbal") values. There are two groups of qualitative MCDA methods which differ in the way knowledge is acquired from the DM while building a decision model (Boose et al. 1993): (1) methods based on an interactive questioning procedure for obtaining the DM's preference, and (2) methods that acquire the DM's preferences directly. ...

Reference:

Extending the multi-criteria decision making method DEX with numeric attributes, value distributions and relational models
Knowledge acquisition techniques for group decision support
  • Citing Article
  • December 1993

Knowledge Acquisition

... Orlikowski (1992) noted that group members' mental models and organization skeletons and conventions eventually affect how GSS is implemented and applied in organization. Boose, et al. (1992) also observed that combining GSS and knowledge acquisition techniques will encourage the collaborative support environment. Thus, leveraging knowledge management realizes the strategic value and enforces the competitive advantage of an organization. ...

Better group decisions: using knowledge acquisition techniques to build richer decision models
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • February 1992