Josefin Runesson’s research while affiliated with Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Carbon pools in a secondary forest. Total C stocks (tC ha⁻¹), and the amount of C in above- and belowground C pools (tC ha⁻¹; mean ± SE, N = 12), in a secondary dipterocarp forest ecosystem in Sabah, Borneo. The size of the circle for individual C pools corresponds to the amount of C in each pool. CWD = coarse woody debris, SDW = Standing dead wood. Illustration by Jerker Lokrantz, Azote.
Above- and belowground carbon in oil palm plantations. Changes in aboveground oil palm C (Palm AGC) and soil organic C during a 22-yr rotation period of oil palm agriculture in Sabah Borneo. Each bar represents individual oil palm plantations that were converted at different times into oil palm production, except for the bar corresponding to 20 years since conversion which represents the avarage of two plantations.
Carbon pricing estimates. Estimated C pricing for conservation of secondary and primary forests to offset opportunity costs of oil palm revenues (x-axis), including aboveground C stocks in tree biomass only, or total C corresponding to C in tree biomass and the soil (y-axis). Values represent the range of estimated C pricing needed to offset opportunity costs in a range of financial scenarios (see Methods and Table 1a) and using discount rates ranging between 2.5 and 10.0%. Illustration by Jerker Lokrantz, Azote.
Calculating estimated carbon pricing. Net present values for different financial scenarios and discount rates (a), and C pools and amount of C lost during forest conversion to oil palm plantation over a 22 year rotation period (b), used to calculate estimated C pricing needed to offset opportunity costs for oil palm agriculture in Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia (c). See Methods for more details.
Accounting for deep soil carbon in tropical forest conservation payments
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2024

·

283 Reads

·

·

·

[...]

·

Secondary tropical forests are at the forefront of deforestation pressures. They store large amounts of carbon, which, if compensated for to avoid net emissions associated with conversion to non-forest uses, may help advance tropical forest conservation. We measured above- and below-ground carbon stocks down to 1 m soil depth across a secondary forest and in oil palm plantations in Malaysia. We calculated net carbon losses when converting secondary forests to oil palm plantations and estimated payments to avoid net emissions arising from land conversion to a 22-year oil palm rotation, based on land opportunity costs per hectare. We explored how estimates would vary between forests by also extracting carbon stock data for primary forest from the literature. When tree and soil carbon was accounted for, payments of US1851tCO21forsecondaryforestsandUS18–51 tCO2–1 for secondary forests and US14–40 tCO2–1 for primary forest would equal opportunity costs associated with oil palm plantations per hectare. If detailed assessments of soil carbon were not accounted for, payments to offset opportunity costs would need to be considerably higher for secondary forests (US$28–80 tCO2–1). These results show that assessment of carbon stocks down to 1 m soil depth in tropical forests can substantially influence the estimated value of avoided-emission payments.

Download