José M. Merigó’s research while affiliated with University of Technology Sydney and other places

The Journal of Heuristics is an international journal that provides a forum to solve complex problems using heuristic solution tools. The journal was created in 1995, and in 2025, celebrates its 30th anniversary. Motivated by this special event, this article presents a bibliometric analysis of the journal. The article examines the journal publication and citation structure using the Scopus database, considering a wide range of issues including the most cited documents, productive authors, institutions, and countries. The work also develops a graphical visualization of the bibliographic data by using the VOS viewer software. This approach is studied with different bibliometric measures such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and co-occurrence of keywords. The results show that the Journal of Heuristics has maintained a solid quality of its publications over the years. Currently, the most popular topics are connected to heuristics, metaheuristics, local search, and tabu search. Researchers from the USA are the most productive. But countries such as France, the UK, Spain and Canada, have also a significant productivity in the journal.

As a significant field of study, thirty-five years of strategic management research has accumulated a substantial amount of knowledge. This bibliometric study explores whether the unlimited flow of knowledge and the globalization of education & research in this time period, could drive away (or deter) the identification and specific interest of research in phenomena of national importance. Using bibliometric techniques and visualization of similarities (VOS) procedures of citation and co-citation analyses, this Paper explores research trends at the country level over 35 years using data from the Web of Science database. The aims are to identify: 1) the most visible and prominent actors at the country, regional, and global-level; 2) the evolution of the subjects of research into strategic management at the country, global, and supra-regional level; and 3) the evolution of journals publishing strategic management research articles by location. Findings suggest that common research subjects coexist at higher levels of aggregation, establishing the “paradigm” or general agreement about the field’s boundaries. Additionally, findings show that at the country level, rather than following a global trend, there is an enduring diversification of research agendas that bow to national and supranational factors from geographically close places.

This paper presents the prioritized induced heavy ordered weighted average (PIHOWA) operator. This operator combines an unbounded weighting vector, an induced vector and a prioritized vector and can be applied to the group decision-making process where the information provided by each decision maker does not have the same importance. An application of this operator is done in governmental transparency in Mexico based on the Open Government Metric (OGM). Among the main results it is possible to visualize how the relative importance of each component can generate important change in the top 10 ranking.

In recent years, an increasing number of studies with a focus on competitiveness and economic sectors have been developed. One of them is tourism competitiveness, also known as tourism destination competitiveness and destination competitiveness. Despite the increasing interest and number of studies in this regard, little can be found about tourism competitiveness using bibliometric methods and techniques. The aim of this paper is to use bibliometric tools to examine the evolution of scientific production on the subject of tourism competitiveness. The information in this paper comes from the Web of Science scientific database. The findings demonstrate how far the research has progressed and how influential it has been in the scientific community. In the years 1991 to 2018, a total of 1,325 papers were recovered. Years, citations, writers, universities, countries, journals, and research areas are conveniently organized and presented form the systematically gathered area. Keywords: tourism competitiveness, tourism destination competitiveness, destination competitiveness, bibliometric analysis JEL Codes: L83, Z32, M10 Received: 21/07/2020. Accepted: 08/01/2021. Published: 01/06/2021.

The concept of the base/bottom of the pyramid (BoP), since its first use in the early 2000s, has been used by researchers and practitioners alike. The past 16 years has witnessed a significant increase in output of published research on the subject. This study aims to analyze the main contributions in this field, using a bibliometric approach. It considers key bibliometric indicators, such as leading authors, journals, institutions, sources, countries, and the most common key-words. A graphical visualization in bibliometric maps has also been developed, using the VOSviewer software. As expected, the results indicate a sharp increase in BoP research over the last 5 years. The most influential research is from the USA, although there has been a considerable wave of production from the global south. The results may be of interest for those hoping to gain an overview of the current state of BoP research.

Background and objective: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (CMPB) is a leading international journal that presents developments about computing methods and their application in biomedical research. The journal published its first issue in 1970. In 2020, the journal celebrates the 50th anniversary. Motivated by this event, this article presents a bibliometric analysis of the publications of the journal during this period (1970-2017). Methods: The objective is to identify the leading trends occurring in the journal by analysing the most cited papers, keywords, authors, institutions and countries. For doing so, the study uses the Web of Science Core Collection database. Additionally, the work presents a graphical mapping of the bibliographic information by using the visualization of similarities (VOS) viewer software. This is done to analyze bibliographic coupling, co-citation and co-occurrence of keywords. Results: CMPB is identified as a leading and core journal for biomedical researchers. The journal is strongly connected to IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. Paper from Wang, Jacques, Zheng (published in 1995) is its most cited document. The top author in this journal is James Geoffrey Chase and the top contributing institution is Uppsala U (Sweden). Most of the papers in CMPB are from the USA followed by the UK and Italy. China and Taiwan are the only Asian countries to appear in the top 10 publishing in CMPB. A keyword co-occurrences analysis revealed strong co-occurrences for classification, picture archiving and communication system (PACS), heart rate variability, survival analysis and simulation. Keywords analysis for the last decade revealed that machine learning for a variety of healthcare problems (including image processing and analysis) dominated other research fields in CMPB. Conclusions: It can be concluded that CMPB is a world-renowned publication outlet for biomedical researchers which has been growing in a number of publications since 1970. The analysis also conclude that the journal is very international with publications from all over the world although today European countries are the most productive ones.

The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) published its first issue in 1991 and in 2015 the journal celebrated its 25th anniversary. This study presents an overview of the leading research trends in the papers that the journal has published during its first quarter of a century via a bibliometric and ontological analysis. From a bibliometric perspective, the analysis considers the publication and citation structure of the journal. The study then develops a graphical analysis of the bibliographic material by using visualisation of similarities software that employs bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis. The work produces an ontological framework of impact and analyses the journal papers to assess qualitatively ISJ’s impact. The results indicate that the journal has grown significantly over time and is now recognised as one of the leading journals in information systems. Yet, challenges remain if the journal is to meet its aims in impacting and setting the agenda for the development of the Information Systems field.