Jose A. Karam’s research while affiliated with University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (507)


MP14-17 VALIDATION OF THE SELECTION FOR CYTOREDUCTIVE NEPHRECTOMY (SCREEN) MODEL IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY (IO) THERAPIES
  • Article

May 2025

The Journal of Urology

Edwin Jabel

·

·

Elizabeth E. Ellis

·

[...]

·

Jose A. Karam


Abstract CT132: Phase 2 trial of metastasis directed radiotherapy without systemic therapy (MRWS) for oligometastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and investigation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a personalized biomarker

April 2025

Cancer Research

Background Current treatment for frontline ccRCC focuses on systemic therapy doublets. Although effective, such combinations exhibit substantial toxicities and healthcare costs. An underutilized option is MRWS, which may facilitate a prolonged systemic therapy-free interval in select patients. Unfortunately, no reliable prognostic markers exist to select patients for MRWS. Although ctDNA assays may guide patient selection, implementation in ccRCC has proven challenging due to limited ctDNA shedding. Therefore, advanced sequencing and bioinformatic pipelines are needed to enhance ctDNA reliability in ccRCC. Methods This phase 2 single-arm trial (NCT03575611) enrolled patients with oligometastatic ccRCC and up to 5 metastases. All patients had either never received systemic therapy or ceased >1 month earlier. Patients were treated with MRWS, consisting of predominately stereotactic radiation therapy to all sites of disease. Subsequent rounds of MRWS were administered if limited progression was observed. The co-primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and systemic therapy free survival (STFS). For the latter, a median STFS of >24 months (mo) was prespecified as the threshold for success. Individualized ctDNA panels (Myriad Genetics) were created from tumor whole genome sequencing and applied to serial plasma samples. Molecular residual disease (MRD) status was determined based on whether ctDNA was detected (MRD+) or not (MRD-). Results Between July 2018 to May 2023, 121 oligometastatic ccRCC patients were enrolled. Median follow up was 36 mo (range 13-68 mo). Most patients (72%) had 1 site of metastatic disease and had never received systemic therapy (70%). The median PFS was 18 mo (95% CI: 15-22 mo) and STFS was 34 mo (95% CI: 28-54 mo). The lower bounds of 95% CI of the median STFS exceeded the prespecified 24 mo threshold for success. Two-year PFS and STFS were 40% and 75%, respectively. Median OS was not reached, and 2- and 3-year OS were 94% and 87%, respectively. Eight (7%) patients experienced grade 3+ toxicities at least possibly attributed to MRWS. There were no grade 5 toxicities.MRD+ was detected in 56% of patients at baseline and associated with significantly shorter STFS (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-6.1, P=0.003). Patients who were MRD+ and MRD- at baseline exhibited 27 vs. 54 mo median STFS, respectively. Three months after MRWS, 31% of MRD + patients converted to MRD-. Positive MRD status at 3 month follow up was strongly associated with shorter STFS (HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.0-9.0, P<0.001). Conclusions MRWS exhibited excellent tolerability and facilitated prolonged time off systemic therapy without compromising OS. Our ctDNA approach appears to be a promising baseline prognostic biomarker for STFS and a dynamic marker of MRWS response. Citation Format Chad Tang, Alexander Sherry, Aaron Seo, Kieko Hara, Haesun Choi, Suyu Liu, Xiaowen Sun, Anya Montoya, Ethan Ludmir, Amishi Y. Shah, Eric Jonasch, Amado J. Zurita, Craig Kovitz, Christopher J. Battey, Sarah Ratzel, Giannicola Genovese, Kanishka Sircar, Jose Karam, Nizar Tannir, Pavlos Msaouel. Phase 2 trial of metastasis directed radiotherapy without systemic therapy (MRWS) for oligometastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and investigation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a personalized biomarker [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT132.



Combination of ICT plus surgery is safe and feasible in the metastatic setting
a Schema for clinical trial NCT02210117. Patients with mccRCC underwent baseline tumor biopsy and blood sample collection before being randomly assigned to receive nivolumab (n = 30), nivolumab + bevacizumab (n = 45), or nivolumab + ipilimumab (n = 30) for a total of 6 weeks. Four to six weeks after the ICT treatment, based upon evaluation by medical oncologists and urologists specialized on RCC, patients underwent either cytoreductive surgery or tumor biopsy. Two to four weeks after cytoreductive surgery or biopsy, nivolumab was given as maintenance therapy to each patient for up to 2 years or until disease progression or intolerable toxicities or withdrawal from the protocol. Tissue and blood samples were collected at pre-ICT treatment and at the time of surgery or biopsy (4–6 weeks after the initial 6 weeks of ICT treatment) for correlative studies. b Overall survival (OS) in Arm A (nivolumab). c OS in Arm B (nivolumab + bevacizumab). d OS in Arm C (nivolumab + ipilimumab).
Identification of immuno-genomic biomarkers from tumor tissues of mccRCC patients
a Oncoplot showing the somatic mutation landscape of the top 5 mutated genes [from TCGA. Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC)]. A total of 58 tumor tissue samples were. analyzed and each column represents a patient. The color bar at the bottom shows response for. each patient (PD=progressive disease, SD=stable disease, PR=partial response). The genes are listed on the left and their respective frequencies are listed on the right of the heatmap. The colored rectangles indicate different types of somatic mutations and the key identifying each mutation type is shown at the bottom of the heatmap. The bar plot on the top shows the somatic mutation count for each patient. The bar plot on the right side shows the counts of mutations for each gene and the colors in the bar plots correspond to the colors showing mutation types in the body of the heatmap. b Stacked bar plot showing a positive association of genomic signature (mutations in PBRM1 or SETD2 genes) with clinical responses. Patients (n = 58) were stratified into Mut (patients with mutations in SETD2 or PBRM1, n = 25) and WT (patients with wild-type SETD2 and PBRM1. genes, n = 33) groups (p = 0.03). c–d Box plots showing association of IFN-γ signature (c) and. TLS signature (d) with clinical responses (n = 83). Box plots represent the median, interquartile. range and the whiskers represent 1.5 x the upper and lower interquartile range values. Welch’s. ANOVA test across the 3 groups for IFN-γ signature (p = 0.025) and TLS signature (p = 0.039). Stacked bar plot showing a positive association of IFN-γ signature (e) and TLS signature (f). with response. Patients (83) were stratified into IFNGhigh (n = 41) and IFNGlow (n = 42) groups. (p = 0.02) (e) or into TLShigh (n = 41) and TLSlow (n = 42) (f). Statistical significance was calculated using two-sided Welch’s ANOVA, Welch’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test for comparing z scores in 3 or more unpaired groups, comparing z scores in 2 unpaired groups and comparing group counts, respectively. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The following color scheme is used in all figures showing biological response groups; PD=blue, SD=yellow, and PR=red.
Spatial distribution of immune cell subsets using CODEX
a Multiplex IF of immune cell aggregate for a representative partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) case showing staining for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, Ki-67, Pan CK and CD31 (PR, n = 4; PD, n = 4) (b) Heatmap of the average expression of 25 markers in the different cell clusters is shown. (c) The UMAP plots for PR and PD cases shows a total of 15 cell clusters that were validated by manual inspection of multiplexed immunostains from a 25 markers panel staining using CODEX. Color- code correspond to those for each cluster in the fig. (b). d Pie graph shows percentages of most abundant cell clusters in PR and PD cases. (e, f) Neighborhood (CN) are defined based on the presence of the 15 validated clusters. A total of six CN are identified. The stacked bar graph shows distribution of each cell neighborhood between PR (n = 4) and PD (n = 4) cases. The statistical test used is two-sided pairwise t-tests on the transformed proportions, comparing PR and PD cohorts. The resulting p-values were corrected for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. g The bar plots show average cell distance to nearest B cells from different cell subsets when comparing 25 regions of interest from a total of eight cases (PR, n = 4; PD, n = 4), each dots represent each region of interest from all PR and PD cases. Box plots represent the median, interquartile range and the whiskers represent 1.5 x the upper and lower interquartile range values. The statistical test used is two-sided Welch Two Sample t-test on the average minimum distance metric between our two patient cohorts.
Pro-inflammatory changes in innate immune status after cytoreductive surgery
a UMAP projection of myeloid cell subclusters in peripheral blood. b Dot plot indicating the. average expression of indicated genes as well as the percentage of cells expressing the gene to define myeloid subclusters. c–e Box plots of frequency of cDCs (c), HLA-DRhi monocytes (d), and KDM6B⁺HIF1A⁺ monocytes (e), from patients who underwent surgery (n = 10) or biopsy (n = 9) comparing post-surgery or post-biopsy samples to baseline (BL). Box plots represent the median, interquartile range and the whiskers represent 1.5 x the upper and lower interquartile range values. P values indicated were analyzed using two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. f, g Identity of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in cDCs (f) and KDM6B⁺HIF1A⁺ monocytes (g) from PBMCs. P values indicated were analyzed using two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Bonferroni adjustment was performed for multiple comparisons.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus debulking surgery for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and immunological correlates of a prospective pilot trial
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2025

·

42 Reads

·

1 Citation

Surgical removal of primary tumors reverses tumor-mediated immune suppression in pre-clinical models with metastatic disease. However, how cytoreductive surgery in the metastatic setting modulates the immune responses in patients, especially in the context of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT), is not understood. We report the first prospective, pilot, non-comparative clinical trial (NCT02210117) to evaluate the feasibility, clinical benefits, and immunologic changes of combining three different ICT-containing strategies with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Primary safety endpoint of this trial has been met, with 43 patients completing cytoreductive surgery, 36 patients undergoing post-ICT biopsy, and 25 patients without either procedure due to progressive disease or toxicities or withdrawal of consent (total N = 104). Patients receiving ICT with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy, did not experience additional ICT- or procedure-related toxicities. The median overall survival was 54.7 months for patients who received ICT plus cytoreductive surgery. Immune-monitoring studies demonstrated that cytoreductive surgery increased antigen-presenting dendritic cell population and decreased KDM6B-expressing immune-suppressive myeloid cells in the peripheral blood. This study highlighted the feasibility of combining ICT with cytoreductive surgery in a metastatic setting and demonstrated the potential enhancement of immune responses following ICT plus cytoreductive surgery.

Download

Temporal trends and socioeconomic determinants of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) utilization for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the United States (US).

February 2025

·

9 Reads

Journal of Clinical Oncology

447 Background: The evolving treatment landscape in mRCC since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rendered the role of CN unclear. We sought to quantify CN utilization in the US over the past two decades and assess factors that affect equitable access to CN. Methods: We performed an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database, using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic and procedure codes to identify mRCC patients undergoing CN from 2006 to 2021. We calculated annual CN utilization rates, stratified by demographic and socioeconomic factors. We then performed univariable and directed acyclic graph-guided multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine the effect of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors on CN utilization rates. Results: There has been a significant decrease in CN utilization in 2021 compared to 2006 (8.7% vs. 15.8%; OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.61), consistent across all demographic and socioeconomic groups. Factors associated with decreased CN utilization include Black race (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.76), Hispanic race (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95), female gender (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), being a Medicare (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.73) or Medicaid beneficiary (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.64), lowest income quartile (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90), Southern US location (aOR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.74-0.93), and treatment in small-sized (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.63) or rural hospitals (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.27-0.40). CN utilization has significantly decreased during the ICI era compared to the TKI era (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.75). Conclusions: CN utilization has steadily declined across the US over the past two decades, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding its role in mRCC management as new systemic therapies emerge. Access to CN is marked by significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities. Defining the evolving role of CN in the current mRCC treatment era and addressing these disparities is crucial to optimize patient outcomes. Characteristic Univariable analysis(OR [95% CI]) p -value Multivariable analysis(aOR [95% CI]) p -value Black race (ref. White) 0.70 (0.64-0.76) <0.001 - - Hispanic race (ref. White) 0.87 (0.80-0.95) 0.001 - - Female gender (ref. male) 0.94 (0.90-0.98) 0.008 - - 1 st quartile income (ref. 4 th quartile) 0.79 (0.73-0.85) <0.001 0.84 (0.78-0.90) <0.001 Medicare (ref. private insurance) 0.55 (0.53-0.58) <0.001 0.69 (0.64-0.73) <0.001 Medicaid (ref. private insurance) 0.58 (0.54-0.63) <0.001 0.59 (0.54-0.64) <0.001 Southern US (ref. Northeastern US) 0.82 (0.73-0.92) 0.001 0.83 (0.74-0.93) 0.002 Small hospital (ref. large hospital) 0.56 (0.50-0.62) <0.001 0.57 (0.51-0.63) <0.001 Rural hospital (ref. urban teaching hospital) 0.32 (0.27-0.38) <0.001 0.33 (0.27-0.40) <0.001


Characteristics of ER
a, Schematic showing the inclusion criteria for participants demonstrating ER on the basis of response, tumor shrinkage and PFS. Created with BioRender.com. b, Comparison of responses within a treatment arm for the clinical cohort and the IMDC cohort. Left: IO/IO participants; right: IO/VEGF participants. The number of participants per group is indicated in the figure (IO/IO: IMDC, ER = 23, IR = 151, SD = 136, PD = 91; trial, ER = 110, IR = 81, SD = 163, PD = 87; IO/VEGF: IMDC, ER = 28, IR = 113, SD = 103, PD = 28; trial, ER = 26, IR = 206, SD = 123, PD = 55). c, Proportion of participants based on the responses within the two clinical cohorts. The pie charts represent all participants within the cohort. Top: IO/IO participants; bottom: IO/VEGF participants.
Source data
Baseline CNL is associated with ER to IO/IO therapy
a, CNL was associated with ER but not with objective response to IO/IO. b, TMB was not significantly associated with ER and objective response (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Box plot hinges represent 25th to 75th percentiles, central lines represent the medians, whiskers extend to the highest and lowest values no greater than 1.5 × the interquartile range and dots indicate outliers; the violin component refers to the kernel probability density and encompasses all samples. The number of participants per group is indicated on the graphs in a,b. c, Higher CNL was associated with improved PFS. Participants were dichotomized into two groups on the basis of CNL into first and third quartiles, respectively (two-sided log-rank test). d, CNL was an independent predictor of PFS (n = 151 participants). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, race, IMDC risk score and ITH. For each variable, the P values were computed against the reference. Red circles indicate P ≤ 0.05 (Cox proportional hazards model; error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals). HR, hazard ratio. **P ≤ 0.01.
Source data
ERs to IO/VEGF are marked by increased intratumoral humoral responses and associated with TLSs
a, GSEA comparing ER to PD showing that pathways associated with BCR regulation and signaling are enriched in ERs. b, ERs had a higher proportion of plasma cells, CD8⁺ T cells and memory B cells (red) compared to PD, according to CIBERSORTx deconvolution of RNA-seq data. Dashed lines indicate the significance thresholds of P = 0.25 and P = 0.05 (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; n = 22 ER and n = 46 PD in a,b). c, ERs had a significantly higher TLS signature score compared to both IR and PD, using three different gene sets (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Box plot hinges represent the 25th to 75th percentiles, central lines represent the medians, whiskers extend to the highest and lowest values no greater than 1.5 × the interquartile range and dots indicate outliers; the violin component refers to the kernel probability density and encompasses all samples. n indicates the number of participants belonging to each group.
Source data
ERs with lower TLS scores demonstrate higher CNL and increased metabolic activity
a, Unsupervised clustering of ER and PD samples based on the genes in the TLS signature showing two distinct clusters. Each column of the heat map indicates a participant (n = 68 participants). b, TLS-low ERs had higher CNL compared to TLS-high ERs (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Box plot hinges represent the 25th to 75th percentiles, central lines represent the medians, whiskers extend to the highest and lowest values no greater than 1.5 × the interquartile range and dots indicate outliers; the violin component refers to the kernel probability density and encompasses all samples (ER TLS-high, n = 7 participants; ER TLS-low, n = 5 participants). c, TLS-low ERs had increased metabolic activity compared to TLS-high ERs according to ssGSEA analysis of RNA-seq data. Dashed lines indicate the significance thresholds of P = 0.25 (dark) and P = 0.05 (light) (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; n = 13 TLS-high participants and n = 9 TLS-low participants). Pathways associated with metabolic activity are highlighted in red. d, TLS-low ERs had an increased metabolic activity signature compared to IR and PD (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Box plot hinges represent the 25th to 75th percentiles, central lines represent the medians, whiskers extend to the highest and lowest values no greater than 1.5 × the interquartile range and dots indicate outliers; the violin component refers to the kernel probability density and encompasses all samples (n = 9 ER TLS-low participants, n = 176 IR participants and n = 46 PD participants). e, Metabolic activity was an independent predictor of PFS (n = 334 participants). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, race, IMDC risk score and TLS signature. For each variable, the P values were computed against the reference. Red circles indicate P ≤ 0.05 (Cox proportional hazards model; error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals). *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001. f, Schematic showing the pathways to achieve ER.
Source data
Immunogenomic determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in renal cell carcinoma

January 2025

·

102 Reads

·

5 Citations

Nature Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors can lead to ‘exceptional’, durable responses in a subset of persons. However, the molecular basis of exceptional response (ER) to immunotherapy in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has not been well characterized. Here we analyzed pretherapy genomic and transcriptomic data in treatment-naive persons with mccRCC treated with standard-of-care immunotherapies: (1) combination of programmed cell death protein and ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors (IO/IO) or (2) combination of PD1/PDL1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitors (IO/VEGF). In the IO/IO cohort, clonal neoantigen load was significantly higher in persons with ER. In the IO/VEGF cohort, ER participants displayed strong enrichment of B cell receptor signaling-related pathways, tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) signatures and evidence of increased metabolic activity. Our results suggest that ER may be related to clonal neoantigen-driven cytotoxic T cell responses and TLS formation in tumor microenvironments. Therapeutic combinations that elicit both T cell-directed and B cell-directed antitumor immunity may be important to achieve exceptional benefit to IO-based treatment in ccRCC.



Fig. 1. Reasons for prior non-participation in clinical trials (Participants could accept all that apply) in a study on views on kidney cancer trial participation.
Fig. 2. Reported reasons to participate in a clinical trial in a study on views on kidney cancer trial participation.
Fig. 3. Facilitators to clinical trial participation in a study on views on kidney cancer trial participation.
Perspectives on Neoadjuvant Clinical Trial Participation for Patients with Kidney Cancer: A Survey-Based Examination

August 2024

·

17 Reads

Kidney Cancer

Background Kidney cancer is amongst the deadliest genitourinary malignancies. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy has the potential to improve survival and overall outcomes in select patients. Enrolling patients in trials of neoadjuvant treatment for kidney cancer is challenging, which limits neoadjuvant treatment development. Objective This study aims to develop a better understanding of the barriers patients face in kidney cancer clinical trial participation, with a particular focus on neoadjuvant trials for renal cell carcinoma. Methods From 2022–2023, we recruited participants with a history of kidney cancer through a Qualtrics survey that was sent to the Kidney Cancer Association (KCA) and Kidney Cancer Cure (KCCure) mailing lists and social media pages. Patient responses on demographics, clinical information, and perspectives were evaluated. Results Ninety-four individuals completed the survey. Eighty-one percent of respondents reported not participating in clinical trials due to not being informed about potential applicable trials. Importantly, many (76%) respondents reported that prevention of cancer return was a highly important reason to participate in clinical trials. Most respondents reported a willingness to undergo a kidney biopsy (59%), and/or additional appointments (58%) and surgery delays. Conclusions Increased patient awareness about clinical trials with the potential to delay cancer recurrence may increase patient participation in clinical trials. Clinical trial design, including additional appointments or interventions and/or minor surgery delays are not major barriers to trial participation.



Citations (45)


... More recently, a focus to identify biomarkers predicting deep responses to ICI therapy has provided new insights. 16 A higher clonal neoantigen load and lower intratumoral heterogeneity were seen with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. In contrast, enriched tertiary lymphoid structures, increased B cell activation and high metabolic signatures were found in VEGF/TKI exceptional responders. ...

Reference:

"Biomarker analyses from randomized trials in clear cell renal cell carcinoma"
Immunogenomic determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in renal cell carcinoma

Nature Cancer

... Many of the patients relapse within the first 3 months after completion of adjuvant immunotherapy (IO). If they received subsequent treatment with IO or a TKI, their response was very similar in both groups [57]. According to Dr. Tanguay, this suggests that first-line therapy consisting of a combination of IO-IO or IO-TKI may not provide the same level of benefit in that patient population. ...

First-line Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: An International Multicenter Study
  • Citing Article
  • August 2024

European Urology

... e study emphasizes that mRCC often presents with hematuria and usually metastasizes to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. [28] MRCC is a rare and aggressive tumor that is usually seen in young patients with sickle cell disease, especially in African individuals, and imaging findings provide important clinical clues. Studies emphasize that these tumors are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage and have a heterogeneous structure with no clear borders on imaging. ...

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Patients with Renal Medullary Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis of 135 Patients
  • Citing Article
  • July 2024

European Urology Oncology

... IGA of small renal masses is often performed under CT-or ultrasound-guided assistance, but ablation can also be performed with MRI guidance, which has a few benefits including being radiation-free. Firstly, compared to CT, MRI offers superior contrast resolution, coupled with the diverse array of sequences available, enabling superior characterisation and localisation of tumours, particularly in cases of endophytic and hilar tumours or poorly enhancing tumours that can be challenging to visualise on CT or ultrasound [77,78]. Furthermore, MRI allows for potential real-time control of needle advancement [78]. ...

Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging-Guided Cryoablation for Solitary-Biopsy-Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience

... Abdelsalam et al. published the results of the largest to date cohort treated with thermal ablation following PN [33]. Reported ablation technical success rate was 100%, although only 14 out of 74 procedures were PCA. ...

Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma after Prior Partial Nephrectomy
  • Citing Article
  • November 2023

European Urology Open Science

... населення. Захворювання в 2-4 рази частіше зустрічається у жінок, ніж у чоловіків [1,2]. За даними NCCN (Національна комплексна онкологічна мережа) та ESE (Європейське товариство ендокринології), остаточних рекомендацій щодо лікування поширеного та метастатичного раку надниркових залоз немає [3,4]. ...

Incidence and Geographical Distribution of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis of a State Cancer Registry
  • Citing Article
  • October 2023

Endocrine Practice

... Потенциальными маркерами развития метастазов при СКК являются miR-191-5p, miR-324-3p и miR-186-5p, представленность которых в моче пациентов с метастазирующим СКК существенно повышена [92]. В качестве биомаркера, позволяющего оценить клинические результаты лечения у пациентов с метастатической формой СКК, предлагается использовать miR-210-3p, уровень представленности которой в моче коррелировал с ответом на терапию [93]. ...

Urinary miRNAs Predict Metastasis in Patients With Clinically Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nephrectomy
  • Citing Article
  • October 2023

Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

... It was found to outperform the IMDC model in the predicting accuracy of first-year mortality (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves 0.76 for SCREEN versus 0.55 for IMDC). 31 There are also studies suggesting that the use of multidisciplinary team discussion involving urologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, pathologists and specialist nurses may improve survival outcomes for mRCC patients. 32 In this regard, the development of better prognostication methods and adoption of coordinated multidisciplinary care are high in order, to make the best personalized clinical decisions for mRCC patients. ...

The Selection for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (SCREEN) Score: Improving Surgical Risk Stratification by Integrating Common Radiographic Features
  • Citing Article
  • July 2023

European Urology Oncology

... It preferentially binds to the "GT-CACGTGAC" motif found in the promoter regions of targeted genes and also referred to as coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation (CLEAR) element. Other studies have confirmed the potential benefit of neddylation inhibitors for tumor-sensitizing therapies to different chemotherapeutic agents [126][127][128]. Therefore, interference with single components of the autophagic UBC12/TRIM25/TFEB axis may offer a further pharmacological approach to restore the sensitivity of breast cancer and probably other cancer types to chemotherapy-induced cell death (Figure 7). ...

Neddylation inhibition sensitises renal medullary carcinoma tumours to platinum chemotherapy

... However, a recent Phase II trial of neoadjuvant sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients undergoing nephrectomy for locally advanced RCC did not substantially increase the overall response rates. 33 We previously reported that RCC-infiltrating NK cells express lower levels of DNAM-1 compared with peripheral blood NK cells. 34 Here, we extend these findings and show that DNAM-1 positive NK cells are enriched in low stage and grade RCC. ...

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients undergoing nephrectomy for locally advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma