Jorge Nocedal’s research while affiliated with Northwestern University and other places

This paper introduces a modified Byrd-Omojokun (BO) trust region algorithm to address the challenges posed by noisy function and gradient evaluations. The original BO method was designed to solve equality constrained problems and it forms the backbone of some interior point methods for general large-scale constrained optimization. A key strength of the BO method is its robustness in handling problems with rank-deficient constraint Jacobians. The algorithm proposed in this paper introduces a new criterion for accepting a step and for updating the trust region that makes use of an estimate in the noise in the problem. The analysis presented here gives conditions under which the iterates converge to regions of stationary points of the problem, determined by the level of noise. This analysis is more complex than for line search methods because the trust region carries (noisy) information from previous iterates. Numerical tests illustrate the practical performance of the algorithm.

The motivation for this paper stems from the desire to develop an adaptive sampling method for solving constrained optimization problems, in which the objective function is stochastic and the constraints are deterministic. The method proposed in this paper is a proximal gradient method that can also be applied to the composite optimization problem min $f(x) + h(x)$, where f is stochastic and h is convex (but not necessarily differentiable). Adaptive sampling methods employ a mechanism for gradually improving the quality of the gradient approximation so as to keep computational cost to a minimum. The mechanism commonly employed in unconstrained optimization is no longer reliable in the constrained or composite optimization settings, because it is based on pointwise decisions that cannot correctly predict the quality of the proximal gradient step. The method proposed in this paper measures the result of a complete step to determine if the gradient approximation is accurate enough; otherwise, a more accurate gradient is generated and a new step is computed. Convergence results are established both for strongly convex and general convex f. Numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the practical behavior of the method.

Classical trust region methods were designed to solve problems in which function and gradient information are exact. This paper considers the case when there are errors (or noise) in the above computations and proposes a simple modification of the trust region method to cope with these errors. The new algorithm only requires information about the size/standard deviation of the errors in the function evaluations and incurs no additional computational expense. It is shown that, when applied to a smooth (but not necessarily convex) objective function, the iterates of the algorithm visit a neighborhood of stationarity infinitely often, assuming errors in the function and gradient evaluations are bounded. It is also shown that, after visiting the above neighborhood for the first time, the iterates cannot stray too far from it, as measured by the objective value. Numerical results illustrate how the classical trust region algorithm may fail in the presence of noise, and how the proposed algorithm ensures steady progress towards stationarity in these cases.

The goal of this paper is to investigate an approach for derivative-free optimization that has not received sufficient attention in the literature and is yet one of the simplest to implement and parallelize. In its simplest form, it consists of employing derivative-based methods for unconstrained or constrained optimization and replacing the gradient of the objective (and constraints) by finite-difference approximations. This approach is applicable to problems with or without noise in the functions. The differencing interval is determined by a bound on the second (or third) derivative and by the noise level, which is assumed to be known or to be accessible through difference tables or sampling. The use of finite-difference gradient approximations has been largely dismissed in the derivative-free optimization literature as too expensive in terms of function evaluations or as impractical in the presence of noise. However, the test results presented in this paper suggest that it has much to be recommended. The experiments compare newuoa, dfo-ls and cobyla against finite-difference versions of l-bfgs, lmder and knitro on three classes of problems: general unconstrained problems, nonlinear least squares problems and nonlinear programs with inequality constraints.

Classical trust region methods were designed to solve problems in which function and gradient information are exact. This paper considers the case when there are bounded errors (or noise) in the above computations and proposes a simple modification of the trust region method to cope with these errors. The new algorithm only requires information about the size of the errors in the function evaluations and incurs no additional computational expense. It is shown that, when applied to a smooth (but not necessarily convex) objective function, the iterates of the algorithm visit a neighborhood of stationarity infinitely often, and that the rest of the sequence cannot stray too far away, as measured by function values. Numerical results illustrate how the classical trust region algorithm may fail in the presence of noise, and how the proposed algorithm ensures steady progress towards stationarity in these cases.

A common approach for minimizing a smooth nonlinear function is to employ finite-difference approximations to the gradient. While this can be easily performed when no error is present within the function evaluations, when the function is noisy, the optimal choice requires information about the noise level and higher-order derivatives of the function, which is often unavailable. Given the noise level of the function, we propose a bisection search for finding a finite-difference interval for any finite-difference scheme that balances the truncation error, which arises from the error in the Taylor series approximation, and the measurement error, which results from noise in the function evaluation. Our procedure produces near-optimal estimates of the finite-difference interval at low cost without knowledge of the higher-order derivatives. We show its numerical reliability and accuracy on a set of test problems. When combined with L-BFGS, we obtain a robust method for minimizing noisy black-box functions, as illustrated on a subset of synthetically noisy unconstrained CUTEst problems.

The problem of interest is the minimization of a nonlinear function subject to nonlinear equality constraints using a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method. The minimization must be performed while observing only noisy evaluations of the objective and constraint functions. In order to obtain stability, the classical SQP method is modified by relaxing the standard Armijo line search based on the noise level in the functions, which is assumed to be known. Convergence theory is presented giving conditions under which the iterates converge to a neighborhood of the solution characterized by the noise level and the problem conditioning. The analysis assumes that the SQP algorithm does not require regularization or trust regions. Numerical experiments indicate that the relaxed line search improves the practical performance of the method on problems involving uniformly distributed noise. One important application of this work is in the field of derivative-free optimization, when finite differences are employed to estimate gradients.