Jonathan Crowe’s research while affiliated with Bond University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (39)


Understanding the Information Experiences of Parents Involved in Negotiating Post-separation Parenting Arrangements
  • Article

January 2023

·

3 Reads

SSRN Electronic Journal

·

·

·

[...]

·

Annelies Allcock










Citations (10)


... These principles of confidentiality, neutrality, and collaboration are essential to the effectiveness of mediation as a dispute resolution mechanism (Field & Crowe, 2020). By providing a safe and secure environment, maintaining impartiality, and promoting a cooperative problem-solving approach, mediation empowers the parties to take an active role in resolving their dispute, rather than having a third party impose a decision (Connerty, 2014). ...

Reference:

Regulation of the Role of Mediators in Efforts to Resolve Employment Disputes: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and United Kingdom
Introduction: the need for a new paradigm of mediation ethics
  • Citing Chapter
  • May 2020

... The Law Council of Australia (2019) in its ethical guidelines notes that while a mediator is unable to ensure that parties are fully informed, it is appropriate to advise as to the importance of consulting with others so they can make informed decision. As noted by Field and Crowe (2017) this inherently requires understanding of the 'rules of the game' as a prerequisite to assessing options and ultimately decision making. The survey of callers to the Relationship Australia helpline by Crowe et al (2018) found that accessing reliable and understandable information about legal matters is not straightforward. ...

Playing the Language Game of Family Mediation: Implications for Mediator Ethics
  • Citing Article
  • December 2018

Law in Context A Socio-legal Journal

... En el campo de la validez fáctico-social Finnis reivindica las ocho desiderata de Fuller, pero la definición focal del derecho incluye los requerimientos de la razón, o dicho con resonancias hartianas, las reglas jurídicas son razones para la acción y buenas razones en tanto promueven los bienes básicos y el florecimiento humano. La positividad del derecho (reglas producidas) (law has been used whit a focal meaning so as to refer primarily to rules made (Finnis, 1992a , p. 276)), incluyen esos principios y normas que en las teorías del derecho natural se denomina ius Gentium o "ius cogens erga homnes (literalmente "derecho que es vinculante [sin acuerdo o promulgación u otras formas de adopción] en relación con todos" o "derechos humanos fundamentales" (Finnis, 2011c). ...

Natural Law Theories
  • Citing Article
  • February 2016

Philosophy Compass

... The term "comfort women" is used to refer to females trafficked to the military brothels (known as "comfort stations") operated by the Imperial Japanese polity during World War II (WWII) (Hicks, 1997;Hsu, 1993;Kimura, 2016;Lee & Crowe, 2015;Min, 2021;Min et al., 2020;Min & Lee, 2018;Nishino et al., 2018;Pilzer, 2014;Yoshimi, 2000). Hundreds of thousands of minors from countries including Korea, China, the Philippines, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, the Netherlands, and Australia were abducted across Asia-Pacific regions under Japanese occupation. ...

The Deafening Silence of the Korean “Comfort Women”: A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray
  • Citing Article
  • July 2015

Asian Journal of Law and Society

... Their original texts remain unchanged and they are valid. Then, articles, chapters, parts, inspired by their time and aimed to solve completely different problems, are added to the original texts subsequently [15]. This structure of the constitutional text is similar to archaeological tandem levels. ...

Law as Memory
  • Citing Article
  • June 2015

Law and Critique

... Some recent work in Natural Law has focused on how political arrangements are more than a moral backdrop for our nature. Jonathan Crowe (2015) acknowledges that our ability to flourish depends on our own "normative inclinations" to recognize basic goods and appropriately actualize them, but he adds that flourishing also depends on social structures, technology, and political resources. Friendship is a basic good that promotes flourishing, but people living in the Stone Age were constrained by how they could actualize it because they couldn't really befriend anyone who wasn't physically close by. ...

Natural Law and Normative Inclinations
  • Citing Article
  • March 2015

Ratio Juris

... It does not begin with general social and economic policies that then filter down to nameless persons; rather, it begins with interpersonal relations and then develops organically into a wider social order. 45 The conception of justice at work in this vision is not the kind of institutional or distributive justice that forms the focus of much contemporary political philosophy; rather, it rests on an economy of kindness where institutional questions are subsidiary to the demands of interpersonal ethics. 46 Small justice, as presented above, does not simply ignore broader institutional questions. ...

Levinas on Shared Ethical Judgments
  • Citing Article
  • October 2014

Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology

... The data suggested that men's attitudes toward sexuality education ranged from disinterest, rejection, to support, and these attitudes were aligned with their positioning toward feminism. A similar pattern of results was obtained in Crowe's (2011) study which classified men's response to feminism as "not about them," opposing their interests and exhibiting their active support. ...

Men and Feminism: Some Challenges and a Partial Response
  • Citing Article
  • October 2011

... There is also evidence that some judges apply outdated attitudes and assumptions, thereby frustrating implementation of the 'reasonable' standard. For example, in Queensland, Australia, the Court of Appeal has allowed appeals and set aside rape convictions in a series of cases on the basis that the defence of honest and reasonable belief in consent (mistake of fact) should have been left to the jury (Crowe, 2011). Given that these cases involved significant power disparities, coercion, repeated assaults and often explicit force or violence, it is worrying that appellate judges take the view that reasonable belief in consent was possible in the circumstances (Crowe, 2011). ...

Consent, Power and Mistake of Fact in Queensland Rape Law
  • Citing Article
  • Full-text available
  • September 2011

Bond Law Review