John N. Thompson’s research while affiliated with University of California, Santa Cruz and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (145)


Coevolution in mutualistic networks increases variability in species fitness
a, Histogram showing the distribution of species fitness (rescaled relative to the average) that coevolved in a single mutualistic pair (green bars) or within the 186 empirical networks used to parameterize the model (purple). b, When coevolving within networks, species fitness increased with the number of direct, mutualistic partners up to a saturation point, but it was highly variable among species with the same number of partners. Each fitness value corresponds to the mean value for 10³ numerical simulations of our model. In both a and b, fitness values are rescaled relative to the average of each scenario (coevolution in pairs or in networks) in such a way that zero indicates the average of the distributions in each scenario. In b, only species that coevolved in networks are shown. Parameter values are as follows: mi = 0.5, σGzi2=1.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\sigma }_{G{z}_{i}}^{2}=1.0$$\end{document}, ϱi\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\varrho }_{i}$$\end{document} = 0.2, α = 0.2. θi and initial trait values were sampled from a uniform distribution U[0, 10].
The position of species within networks and indirect evolutionary effects shape species fitness in coevolved mutualistic networks
a, An analytical approximation (solid curve and shaded region) predicts that indirect evolutionary effects decrease the fitness of species coevolving in mutualistic networks. The data points represent species with either one partner (light colours) or more than one (darker dots). This effect held for numerical simulations (n = 10³ numerical simulations for each of the 186 empirical networks), as shown, for example, for species in a plant–pollinator network (inset). b, This effect also held for species across all empirical networks after controlling for the effects of the number of mutualistic partners. The graph shows species with three partners across all networks. c, Example of a seed-dispersal network (inset) showing how species in peripheral positions receive more indirect effects and have lower fitness than core species. The colour of points represents species fitness: the darker the colour, the higher the fitness. In a, the line represents the mean predicted fitness, and shaded regions show standard deviations when sampling species’ environmental optima (θi and 〈θ〉) and 〈z〉 from a normal distribution; θi ~ N(0.0, 0.1), 〈θ〉 ~ N(2.5, 0.1) and 〈z〉 ~ N(2.5, 0.1). Points correspond to the mean value of species fitness (a and b) or the contribution of indirect effects (c) across 10³ numerical simulations. Other parameter values are as follows: mi = 0.5, σGzi2=1.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\sigma }_{G{z}_{i}}^{2}=1.0$$\end{document}, ϱi\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\varrho }_{i}$$\end{document} = 0.2 and α = 0.2. For numerical simulations, θi and initial trait values were sampled from a uniform distribution U[0, 10]. In a and b, the x axis represents the proportional contribution of indirect evolutionary effects (equation (3)).
The reorganization of indirect effects through a biological invasion can reshape species fitness within networks
a, Geographical location of the empirical networks used to parameterize the invasion simulations by honeybees. b, Examples of the speed with which an invader can either increase or decrease the fitness of two native species (blue and pink) within a network (inset above). c, The reorganization of indirect effects after the invasion reshapes the adaptive landscape of the native species, slightly favouring different trait values and changing fitness. Dotted and solid lines represent the adaptive landscape of species before and after coevolving with the invader, respectively. Parameter values are as follows: mi = 0.5, σGzi2=1.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\sigma }_{G{z}_{i}}^{2}=1.0$$\end{document}, ϱi=0.2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\varrho }_{i}=0.2$$\end{document}, α = 0.2. θi and initial trait values were sampled from a uniform distribution U[0, 10].
Indirect evolutionary effects shape the fitness consequences of simulated network invasions
a, The average change in species fitness (across all 10³ simulations) after coevolving with an invasive species. The frequency represents log(counts). b,c, Relationship between the average change in species fitness after the invasion, and the change in the total contribution of indirect evolutionary effects coming from the network for direct (b) partners and indirect (c) partners of the invasive species. Points and histogram bars represent the average values across all simulations (n = 10³ numerical simulations, 73 networks). The x axis in a and the y axis in b,c are rescaled relative to the maximum absolute value of average change in fitness across all species. Parameter values are as follows: mi  =  0.5, σGzi2=1.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\sigma }_{G{z}_{i}}^{2}=1.0$$\end{document}, ϱi=0.2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\varrho }_{i}=0.2$$\end{document}, α  =  0.2. θi and initial trait values were sampled from a uniform distribution U[0, 10].
Indirect effects shape species fitness in coevolved mutualistic networks
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

July 2023

·

548 Reads

·

14 Citations

Nature

·

·

·

[...]

·

Indirect effects shape many aspects of our day to day life. While in social networks indirect effects drive our opinion and behaviour, in economical networks they affect the interdependence among global markets, and in contact networks they drive how contagious diseases spread. In this study we show that indirect effects can also shape one of the major currencies in biology: fitness. We show that the fitness of species that mutually benefit each other and interact in mutualistic networks is driven by indirect evolutionary effects, with important consequences for how species respond to perturbations, for instance, when an alien species is introduced in the network.

View access options

The ripple effects of clines from coevolutionary hotspots to coldspots

June 2023

·

6 Reads

·

1 Citation

Molecular Ecology

Coevolution has the potential to alter not only the ecological interactions of coevolving partners, but also their interactions with yet other species. The effects of coevolution may ripple throughout networks of interacting species, cascading across trophic levels, swamping competitors, or facilitating survival or reproduction of yet other species linked only indirectly to the coevolving partners. These ripple effects of coevolution may differ among communities, amplifying how the coevolutionary process produces geographic mosaics of traits and outcomes in interactions among species. In a From the Cover article in this issue of Molecular Ecology, Hague et al. (2022) provide a clear example, using the well-studied interactions between Pacific newts (Taricha spp.) and their common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) predators in western North America. Pacific newts harbour tetrodotoxin (TTX), which is highly toxic to vertebrate predators. In coevolutionary hotspots, extreme escalation of toxicity in the newts and resistance to toxicity in the snakes have resulted in snake populations that retain high levels of TTX. In two geographic regions, snakes in these hotspot populations have evolved bright, aposematic colours that may act as warning signals to their own vertebrate predators. The warning signals and toxin-resistance alleles in the snake populations decrease clinally away from the coevolutionary hotpots, shaped by a geographically variable mix of selection imposed by the snakes' prey and by their own predators.


Differences in (a, b) contribution of ovipositing Greya politella (POL) to pollination, (c–e) pollinator communities, and (f–h) floral morphology between the two study Lithophragma bolanderi (BOL) populations at the South Fork of the Merced River (SMR) and at the Marble Fork of the Kaweah River (MBL). (a) Proportion of capsules containing traces of ovipositing G. politella and (b) proportion of seeds developed in capsules with (POL) and without (No POL) traces of ovipositing G. politella at SMR and MBL; error bars are 95% CI. (c) Geographical location of the two study populations and the distribution range of L. bolanderi and the two Greya species in Central California and of L. bolanderi, in the USA (insert). (d, e) Abundance of flowering stems (bars, left y‐axis) and pollinator survey data (right y‐axis) for G. politella (POL), G. obscura (OBS), and other pollinators (Alt Poll) at SMR (d) and MBL (e) during each census. (f) Principal component (PC) plot depicting multivariate differences in floral morphology between SMR and MBL based on five floral traits extracted from Thompson et al. (2017a, 2017b). Centroids (larger symbols) and their 95% CI and percentage of variance explained by PC1 and PC2 are given. (g, h) Floral corolla‐opening diameter (CorOpDi) at SMR and MBL; (g) photos by Karin Gross and (h) means ±1 SE are indicated.
(a) A nectaring and (b) an ovipositing Greya politella moth on Lithophragma bolanderi flowers and differences in pollination efficacy when Greya moths visited local (dark) and nonlocal (light) flowers of L. bolanderi for the two pollination modes (c, d) nectaring and (e) oviposition. Pollination efficacy during nectaring on local and nonlocal plants in (c) G. obscura and (d) G. politella. (a, b) A window was cut into the flower for better visibility (photos: John N. Thompson). (c–e) Error bars are 95% CI. (e) Parts of the data on the plants from the Marble Fork of the Kaweah River (MBL) visited by local G. politella moths were extracted from Thompson et al. (2013) (see main text). SMR, South Fork of Merced River.
Components of local adaptation and divergence in pollination efficacy in a coevolving species interaction

April 2023

·

77 Reads

·

6 Citations

Selection leading to adaptation to interactions may generate rapid evolutionary feedbacks and drive diversification of species interactions. The challenge is to understand how the many traits of interacting species combine to shape local adaptation in ways directly or indirectly resulting in diversification. We used the well‐studied interactions between Lithophragma plants (Saxifragaceae) and Greya moths (Prodoxidae) to evaluate how plants and moths together contributed to local divergence in pollination efficacy. Specifically, we studied L. bolanderi and its two specialized Greya moth pollinators in two contrasting environments in the Sierra Nevada in California. Both moths pollinate L. bolanderi during nectaring, one of them–G. politella–also while ovipositing through the floral corolla into the ovary. First, field surveys of floral visitors and the presence of G. politella eggs and larvae in developing capsules showed that one population was visited only by G. politella and few other pollinators, whereas the other was visited by both Greya species and other pollinators. Second, L. bolanderi in these two natural populations differed in several floral traits putatively important for pollination efficacy. Third, laboratory experiments with greenhouse‐grown plants and field‐collected moths showed that L. bolanderi was more efficiently pollinated by local compared to nonlocal nectaring moths of both species. Pollination efficacy of ovipositing G. politella was also higher for local moths for the L. bolanderi population, which relies more heavily on this species in nature. Finally, time‐lapse photography in the laboratory showed that G. politella from different populations differed in oviposition behavior, suggesting the potential for local adaptation also among Greya populations. Collectively, our results are a rare example of components of local adaptation contributing to divergence in pollination efficacy in a coevolving interaction and, thus, provide insights into how geographic mosaics of coevolution may lead to coevolutionary diversification in species interactions.


In remembrance of Victor Rico Gray (1951‐2021): An astonishing tropical ecologist

June 2021

·

123 Reads

Biotropica

In this remembrance, we have brought together some of Victor Rico‐Gray’s friends and collaborators to recall his many contributions to tropical ecology and his influence on so many young scientists. Victor’s research ranged from Mexican ethnobotany to the evolutionary ecology of complex interactions between ants and plants. His research was highly collaborative, forming strong bonds among those who shared his interests in how the web of life is organized. He inspired students through his mentoring in tropical ecology, mainly his lectures at the Instituto de Ecología AC (INECOL), and later at the Universidad Veracruzana (UV), his courses organized by the Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS), and his talks at meetings, including the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation (ATBC). Victor’s story is not over. It will continue to be traced through countless scientists who were inspired by Victor’s life and work. We started by describing the Victor's life and his graduate studies in tropical ecology. Next, we highlight the Victor's importance in the formation of new scientists and in tropical ecology. We finished the text by gathering good memories and anecdotes of Victor.


Examples of gas chromatographic analyses with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) with different Lithophragma floral headspace samples (a, b) and synthetic mixtures (c–e; 100 µg ml⁻¹), and antennae of female Greya politella moths from different populations. a headspace sample of L. bolanderi (MBL) tested on sympatric (MBL) and allopatric (KNG) moths; b headspace sample of L. bolanderi (WOO) tested on allopatric moths (MBL, KNG). The analyses show that moths, irrespective of their origin, respond to the same compounds in the volatile samples. c Synthetic L. bolanderi (MBL) mix tested on KNG antennae, showing responses to all compounds, of which two (camphor and 2-phenylethyl acetate) do not occur in local KNG flowers (Friberg et al. 2019). d 1,4-dimethoxybenzene and 2-phenylethyl acetate tested on SED moths, and E: 1,4-dimethoxybenzene tested on TUR moths. In local SED and TUR flowers, both compounds do not occur. Numbers refer to names of EAD-active compounds in Table 1: letters refer to compounds without detectable EAD activity: (a) diacetone alcohol, (b) benzaldehyde, (c) caryophyllene, (d) methyl benzoate, (e) benzyl alcohol. FID flame ionization detector
a Total ion chromatogram of the ketone fraction of Lithophragma parviflorum (TUR) floral extracts (300 flowers) obtained by SPE fractionation of the crude extract (see methods for details). Retention times of EAD-active compounds are given in bold. b MS spectra of three EAD-active compounds found in the sample. c The output of GC-EAD analysis of the same sample showing flame ionization detector (FID) trace and electroantennographic detection (EAD) trace of two antennae of female Greya politella moths from TUR. The five active compounds are indicated by arrows and/or retention times. For UI 1 and UI 2 no proper MS spectra could be obtained with GC-MS analysis
Selected ion chromatogram of reduced and derivatized aL. cymbalaria, bL. bolanderi, cL. parviflorum, d derivatized synthetic mixture of 6,10,14-trimethylpentadecan-2-ol, e derivatized synthetic (2R,6R,10R)-6,10,14-trimethylpentadecan-2-ol and f derivatized synthetic (2S,6R,10R)-6,10,14-trimethylpentadecan-2-ol
Generalized olfactory detection of floral volatiles in the highly specialized Greya-Lithophragma nursery pollination system

April 2021

·

133 Reads

·

4 Citations

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

Volatiles are of key importance for host-plant recognition in insects. In the pollination system of Lithophragma flowers and Greya moths, moths are highly specialized on Lithophragma, in which they oviposit and thereby pollinate the flowers. Floral volatiles in Lithophragma are highly variable between species and populations, and moths prefer to oviposit into Lithophragma flowers from populations of the local host species. Here we used gas chromatography coupled with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) to test whether Greya moths detect specific key volatiles or respond broadly to many volatiles of Lithophragma flowers. We also addressed whether olfactory detection in Greya moths varies across populations, consistent with a co-evolutionary scenario. We analyzed flower volatile samples from three different species and five populations of Lithophragma occurring across a 1400 km range in the Western USA, and their sympatric female Greya politella moths. We showed that Greya politella detect a broad range of Lithophragma volatiles, with a total of 23 compounds being EAD active. We chemically identified 15 of these, including the chiral 6, 10, 14-trimethylpentadecan-2-one (hexahydrofarnesyl acetone), which was not previously detected in Lithophragma. All investigated Lithophragma species produced the (6R, 10R)-enantiomer of this compound. We showed that Greya moths detected not only volatiles of their local Lithophragma plants, but also those from allopatric populations/species that they not encounter in local populations. In conclusion, the generalized detection of volatiles and a lack of co-divergence between volatiles and olfactory detection may be of selective advantage for moths in tracking hosts with rapidly evolving, chemically diverse floral volatiles.



Impact of genetic correlations on pairwise coevolution. (a) Trait evolution of two traits under selection in a constant environment (fixed adaptive peak, black cross). Genetic correlations (strong and positive – red ellipse) reduce the pace of evolution, taking many more generations (number of red dots along the trajectory) for the species to achieve the adaptive peak than when there is no correlation between traits (blue circle and dots). (b) Trait evolution due to plant–pollinator mutualism. Variable levels and directions of genetic correlations in both partners may lead to distinct trait evolution (solid arrows) even if selection favours the same trait values (dashed arrows). Blue circles – no correlation in both species; red ellipses – strong positive correlation both in plant and pollinator and green ellipses – strong positive correlation for plant and negative for pollinator, i.e. opposite direction correlations. (c) Genetic correlations influence the pace of coevolution affecting the amount of time to achieve trait matching (colours equal to B). Notched boxplots depict the median, first and third quartile, 95% confidence interval (notch) and range (line) with outliers (dots), showing that the time to achieve trait matching varies with patterns of genetic correlations (n = 1000 simulations). (d) Numerical simulation showing the trajectory to trait matching when the plant has strong positive correlation and the pollinator has strong negative correlation (green ellipses – different direction correlations); plant and animal with strong positive correlations (red ellipses – same direction correlations); compared to a scenario when traits are independent in both plant and animal (blue circles). Black dots indicate initial trait values, and the dots along the trajectories indicate the subsequent generations for each species, the stars denote the outcome (always trait matching, i.e. both moth and plant lines meet each other, but in different places in the trait space depending on the genetic correlations; red and blue stars overlap).
Genetic correlations influence population size in mutualistic species. (a) High correlations in the same direction (red) lead to an increase in the time to achieve the equilibrium population size, where the lines represent population size for a simulation with different starting points for high correlations in the same direction (red lines) or no correlation between traits (blue lines). (b) The time to achieve equilibrium population size increased as the same direction correlation in both species increased. Parameters: σa12=σa22=σb12=σb22=2;ωa1=ωa2=ωb1=ωb2=42;Nat=0=Nbt=0=0.01;ra=rb=1.001;α=0.01.
Genetic correlations fuel trait divergence among populations. Pairs of orange and green lines depict distinct simulations of trait evolutionary trajectories (several generations until trait matching). Dots represent the initial trait values. The simulations were parameterised with the empirical phenotypic correlations between ovary depth and petal width in Lithophragma affine plants (green lines) and ovipositor length and wingspan in Greya politella (orange lines) of seven different populations. (a) Variation in the starting point (due to, e.g. among‐population differences in traits) led to just a small variation in the evolutionary trajectories and in the final trait values when there was no correlation between traits. (b) In contrast, variation in the empirical correlations at the local level led to large differences in evolutionary trajectories and trait values among pairs of interacting populations at equilibrium, even assuming all other model parameters are identical and all populations started with the same variation in trait values as in the model with no correlations (a).
Genetic correlations and network structure determine trait evolution. (a) Simulations (grey dots, n = 100 simulations) and analytical predictions (blue and pink dots) of the time to trait matching in coevolution using a representative pollination network (left, blue) and an ant–plant network (right, pink) and assuming different combinations of correlations in each functional group (positive, negative or absent in each group of species). (b) Analytical expectation of time to trait matching derived from our model parameterised with empirical networks (n = 36 networks) and assuming scenarios in which there are no genetic correlations (lighter colours) or in which there are correlations in the same direction (darker points). The effects of genetic correlations are stronger in small modular ant–plant networks (low PC1 scores, pink) than in species‐rich nested pollination networks (high PC1 scores, blue, see Methods, see Figure S20 for regressions against raw network metrics). (c) Genetic correlations also influenced the divergence among populations across sites. Each pair of green‐orange lines depicts trait evolution of the same plant (red circled green dot) and ant (red circled orange dot) species in a given simulation (site) for the network depicted in the upper left corner. Trait initial values are the same for all species in the network in all sites but evolve in different ways due to the variation in the genetic correlations estimated from empirical case studies. (d) Trait variation among populations across 10 hypothetical sites (n = 50 simulations per network, dispersal bars depict 95% confidence interval) is much more conspicuous in a scenario where there was genetic correlation (circles) than with no genetic correlation (triangles).
Genetic correlations amplify the effects of environmental perturbations across communities. (a) If there is no underlying network (i.e. simulations only parameterised with species richness), then genetic correlations (red dots) amplify the effects of environmental perturbations on species traits relative to simulations with uncorrelated traits (green dots). Each line connects the difference in mean trait variation among populations of the same assemblage (n = 100 simulations per assemblage, 10 spatial replicates of each assemblage, 36 empirical assemblages). (b) Trait variation across networks is higher when there is correlation among traits (red) than in simulations using uncorrelated traits (blue), but network structure partially offsets the spatial divergence promoted by genetic correlations (when compared to panel a). Network structure is expressed as a PC1 axis that ranges from species‐poor highly modular networks to species‐rich nested networks.
Genetic correlations and ecological networks shape coevolving mutualisms

September 2020

·

165 Reads

·

17 Citations

Ecology Letters

Ecological interactions shape the evolution of multiple species traits in populations. These traits are often linked to each other through genetic correlations, affecting how each trait evolves through selection imposed by interacting partners. Here, we integrate quantitative genetics, coevolutionary theory and network science to explore how trait correlations affect the coevolution of mutualistic species not only in pairs of species but also in species-rich networks across space. We show that genetic correlations may determine the pace of coevolutionary change, affect species abundances and fuel divergence among populations of the same species. However, this trait divergence promoted by genetic correlations is partially buffered by the nested structure of species-rich mutualisms. Our study, therefore, highlights how coevolution and its ecological consequences may result from conflicting processes at different levels of organisation, ranging from genes to communities.


Coevolution Creates Complex Mosaics across Large Landscapes

April 2019

·

95 Reads

·

17 Citations

The American Naturalist

The spatial distribution of populations can influence the evolutionary outcome of species inter- actions. The variation in direction and strength of selection across local communities creates geographic selection mosaics that, when combined with gene flow and genomic processes such as genome duplication or hybridization, can fuel ongoing coevolution. A fundamental prob- lem to solve is how coevolution proceeds when many populations that vary in their ecological outcomes are connected across large landscapes. Here we use a lattice model to explore this problem. Our results show that the complex interrelationships among the elements of the geo- graphic mosaic of coevolution can lead to the formation of clusters of populations with similar phenotypes that are larger than expected by local selection. Our results indicate that neither the spatial distribution of phenotypes nor the spatial differences in magnitude and direction of selection alone dictate coevolutionary dynamics: the geographic mosaic of coevolution affects formation of phenotypic clusters, which in turn affect the spatial and temporal dynamics of co- evolution. Because the formation of large phenotypic clusters depends on gene flow, we predict current habitat fragmentation will change the outcomes of geographic mosaics, coupling spatial patterns in selection and phenotypes.


Extreme diversification of floral volatiles within and among species of Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae)

February 2019

·

167 Reads

·

67 Citations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Significance A major challenge in biology is to understand how complex traits important for ecological interactions between species coevolve and diversify across contrasting ecosystems. Floral scents are complex, and are often composed of a diverse array of chemicals important for interactions between plants and pollinators, herbivores, and microbial symbionts. We studied diversification of floral scents among populations of all woodland star species ( Lithophragma ) across far-western North America. Floral scent variation was structured not only phylogenetically among species and geographically among populations, but some of the divergence was driven by local differences in the presence of coevolved Greya moth pollinators. These results highlight the importance of conserving multiple populations of species if we are to maintain the evolutionary potential of coevolving interactions.


The geographic mosaic of coevolution in mutualistic networks

November 2018

·

123 Reads

·

69 Citations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Significance The reciprocal evolution of interacting species, or coevolution, generates impressive adaptations in pairs of species across geographic regions. However, we currently do not understand how coevolution shapes adaptations in large groups of species that interact not just locally but also across ecosystems. We use a mathematical model of coevolution and network tools to show that gene flow resulting from movement of individuals among populations may favor, rather than swamp, reciprocal adaptation in mutualisms, especially in large and heterogeneous networks typical of pollination and seed dispersal interactions. Our results suggest that the disruption of gene flow, fueled by human activities, may undermine long-term adaptation in mutualistic assemblages, with severe consequences for the functioning of ecological systems.


Citations (86)


... Considering indirect effects, the proportion of potential effects escaping groups across all scales is considerably larger and increases with the strength of selection imposed by interactions (m). While, individually, indirect effects are 'weaker' than direct effects, when summed, they become a substantial proportion of overall coevolutionary effects ( Figure S19), potentially impacting trait evolution and species fitness (Cosmo et al. 2023). Thus, even if cohesive groups and hierarchical organisation indeed mediate the spread of potential coevolutionary effects, indirect effects blur group boundaries, especially when ecological interactions are a strong source of selection (Abdala-Roberts et al. 2014;Campbell et al. 2022). ...

Reference:

The Hierarchical Coevolutionary Units of Ecological Networks
Indirect effects shape species fitness in coevolved mutualistic networks

Nature

... Additional work should also be done examining differences in honeyeater pollination services between populations of E. maculata. The geographic mosaic theory of coevolution established that coevolution, for example that between plants and pollinators, occurs due to a mosaic of selection pressures in space and time between populations of interacting species [19][20][21] and many studies support the geographic mosaic theory for plant-pollinator trait matching 25,33,68 . E. maculata is found throughout continental Australia, and while to our knowledge there are no other studies on honeyeater visitation to E. maculata, natural history accounts note that honeyeater species such as Sogumel nigrium (black honeyeater) and Certhionyx variegatus (pied honeyeater) visit the species in the more arid interior portions of the continent 69 . ...

Components of local adaptation and divergence in pollination efficacy in a coevolving species interaction

... The significance of learning and early life hunting experiences can have a profound impact on the biological control of pests, especially in predatory species whose foraging behavior is strategically adapted to environmental conditions (Fox et al. 2001;Lo Pinto et al. 2004). Early experiences, particularly those involving food stress, often enhance hunting skills and the capacity for resource storage, which, in turn, improves the survival rates and success of predators in fluctuating and resource-limited environments (Hassell 2000;Schausberger et al. 2020). ...

Evolutionary Ecology: Concepts and Case Studies
  • Citing Article
  • October 2001

... One such theory is the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution, which emphasizes that coevolutionary dynamics can occur not only between interacting populations (e.g., plants and pollinators) but also between geographically connected populations (Thompson, 2005). It is therefore plausible that speciation could arise out of coevolutionary mosaics (Hembry et al., 2014;Thompson et al., 2017). Specifically, local coadaptation could potentially decrease the chance of mating between populations, paving the way for reproductive isolation and consequently speciation . ...

Coevolution and Macroevolution
  • Citing Chapter
  • January 2021

... Similarly, plants involved in obligate pollination mutualism have sometimes evolved the release of particular compounds that function as 'private channels' to their particular mutualist species (Chen et al., 2009;Schäffler et al., 2015). In other specialized pollination mutualisms, plants emit diverse and generic floral scent compounds (Friberg et al., 2014Ramírez et al., 2011), and their specialized pollinators have antennal receptors that detect several to many of these volatiles (Eltz & Lunau, 2005;Schiestl et al., 2021;Svensson et al., 2010). To further complicate the issue, many flowering plants are pollinated by generalist insects (Johnson & Steiner, 2000;Waser et al., 1996), and these are able to learn different floral scents, singularly or in blends (Lawson et al., 2018;Riffell et al., 2008;Wright et al., 2013;Wright & Schiestl, 2009). ...

Generalized olfactory detection of floral volatiles in the highly specialized Greya-Lithophragma nursery pollination system

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

... The presence of intrinsic features responsible for prolonged evolutionary stasis and the existence of living fossils are both contentious (Schopf 1984;Eldredge et al. 2005;Casane and Laurenti 2013;Lidgard and Love 2018). One primary critique is the lack of an explanation for the coupling of low rates of lineage diversification and phenotypic change in clades thought to exhibit stasis. ...

The dynamics of evolutionary stasis
  • Citing Article
  • April 2016

Paleobiology

... As such, it is particularly relevant to systems where a single quantitative trait determines an interaction between two species (e.g., the lengths of an insect's proboscis and a flower's tube, Pauw et al., 2009). Alternatively, a single trait can be considered as a set of traits evolving together due to strong genetic integration (e.g., Assis et al., 2020). It is possible that the inclusion of higher trait dimensions affects the coevolutionary outcomes observed here (Rezende et al., 2007). ...

Genetic correlations and ecological networks shape coevolving mutualisms

Ecology Letters

... These effects of coevolution and remixing on species traits, in turn, may cascade back to affect patterns of colonization, dispersal, extinction and persistence of populations across the landscape [29,30]. While previous studies greatly improved our understanding of how the geographic mosaic of coevolution can shape trait distribution patterns [31][32][33][34][35][36], we are still beginning to understand how these patterns can feedback to affect the distribution, persistence and response of mutualistic species to environmental perturbations [37,38]. ...

Coevolution Creates Complex Mosaics across Large Landscapes
  • Citing Article
  • April 2019

The American Naturalist

... Despite their wellestablished role in attracting pollinating insects, olfactory signals remain less well-studied than visual signals (Raguso, 2008), presumably owing to their typically more complex nature. However, recent literature presents a growing number of studies that documented patterns of within and between population variation in floral scents (e.g. de Manincor et al., 2022;Eisen, Geber, et al., 2022;Friberg et al., 2019;Gfrerer et al., 2021, also reviewed in Delle-Vedove et al., 2017, as well as some studies that investigated phenotypic selection on olfactory signals (e.g. Chapurlat et al., 2019;Gfrerer et al., 2021;Gross et al., 2016;Majetic et al., 2009a;Parachnowitsch et al., 2012) and experimental evolution studies exploring the adaptative dynamics of these particular traits (Gervasi & Schiestl, 2017;Ramos & Schiestl, 2020). ...

Extreme diversification of floral volatiles within and among species of Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae)
  • Citing Article
  • February 2019

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

... Keystone species tend to be more central (i.e., important) in networks by interacting with many other species via multiple direct and indirect pathways (Martín González et al. 2010;Mello et al. 2015;Escribano-Avila et al. 2018). Such central species may also influence the co-evolutionary convergence of traits of interacting partners (Guimarães Jr et al. 2011;Medeiros et al. 2018). Given their importance, the extinction of central species could increase coextinctions, decrease network robustness and even cause negative cascading effects on the ecosystem balance (Emer et al. 2018). ...

The geographic mosaic of coevolution in mutualistic networks
  • Citing Article
  • November 2018

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences