John Gerring’s research while affiliated with Texas A&M University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (90)


Finding Your Social Science Project: The Research Sandbox
  • Book

October 2022

·

75 Reads

·

5 Citations

John Gerring

·

Jason Seawright

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


4 - Strategies

October 2022

·

3 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


2 - Current Practices

October 2022

·

8 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


7 - Soaking and Poking

October 2022

·

16 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


6 - Case Selection

October 2022

·

8 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


1 - Introduction

October 2022

·

4 Reads

Chapter 1 discusses the problem of finding research projects, introduces the breadth of tools available for solving that problem, and offers a roadmap for the rest of the book.


8 - Theoretical Frameworks

October 2022

·

46 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


9 - Explanatory Challenges

October 2022

·

5 Reads

The most important step in social science research is the first step – finding a topic. Unfortunately, little guidance on this crucial and difficult challenge is available. Methodological studies and courses tend to focus on theory testing rather than theory generation. This book aims to redress that imbalance. The first part of the book offers an overview of the book's central concerns. How do social scientists arrive at ideas for their work? What are the different ways in which a study can contribute to knowledge in a field? The second part of the book offers suggestions about how to think creatively, including general strategies for finding a topic and heuristics for discovery. The third part of the book shows how data exploration may assist in generating theories and hypotheses. The fourth part of the book offers suggestions about how to fashion disparate ideas into a theory.


Correction to: How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

April 2022

·

64 Reads

In this paper we outline a new area of research, social science reception: how inferences are reached by social scientists.

View access options

Methodological Pre-Conceptions. Outcome: mean perceived likelihood that the argument presented in an article is true on a scale of 0–100. The vertical bars for each statistic represent 95% univariate confidence intervals. They are not appropriate for tests of differences and are not corrected for multiple comparisons. The statistically significant difference is noted below the graph. The sample includes all subjects who completed the survey except for those who reported being familiar with the article
Diverse Evidence as Stimuli to Causal Inference. Outcomes: mean perceived likelihood that the argument presented in an article is true on a scale of 0–1, with validity defined in four different ways: (a) the causal effect as applied to a broader population, (b) the causal effect as applied to a narrow population, (c) the causal mechanism as applied to a broader population, and (d) the causal mechanism as applied to a narrow population. The vertical bars for each statistic represent 95% univariate confidence intervals. They are not appropriate for tests of differences and are not corrected for multiple comparisons. Statistically significant differences (if any) are noted below each graph. Samples include all subjects that completed the survey question
How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception

In this paper we outline a new area of research, social science reception: how inferences are reached by social scientists. Specifically, we ask how the nature of the evidence affects the sort of causal inferences that social scientists draw. As an exemplar, we focus on multimethod research. Specifically, we subject respondents to an experiment in which each species of evidence constitutes a distinct treatment: (a) qualitative, (b) quantitative, or (c) multimethod. In the abstract, respondents tend to reflect widespread methodological norms about the strengths of multimethod research. However, when confronted with specific studies, scholars are not more likely to believe causal inferences backed by multimethod research than inferences backed by mono-method research. This suggests that there is a misalignment between methodological norms and on-the-ground judgments.


Citations (45)


... El mecanismo causal de esta propuesta sigue la lógica de un mecanismo dentro del "flujo causal" (Gerring, 2022, p. 239) de la escuela de Columbia, en la que el impacto --probabilístico, no determinista-de los factores socioeconómicos en las preferencias electorales está moderado por la dinámica local de competencia partidista particular de cada municipio -en su dimensión de fragmentación electoral (Figura 1). De esta forma, la relación causal derivada del esquema del voto sociológico entre factores estructurales y el éxito electoral de MORENA observada a nivel agregado en los municipios de la ZMVM ocurre de manera diferenciada por su interacción con la dinámica local de competencia electoral de cada uno de los municipios. ...

Reference:

Los determinantes del voto desde la dinámica local: el voto por MORENA en las elecciones municipales de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2015-2021
Finding Your Social Science Project: The Research Sandbox
  • Citing Book
  • October 2022

... Specifically: H 2 (intensity): The liberalizing effect of university attendance on the cultural dimension of party ideology increases with additional years of tertiary education. 3 Four studies were pre-registered at the same time, each utilizing data from the same RD design but focused on a different outcome: social capital (Apfeld et al., 2022a), cultural liberalism (Apfeld et al., 2022b), corruption (Apfeld et al., 2022c), and partisanship (the current study). 4 Confusingly, this noneconomic dimension of politics calls forth a number of overlapping labels, e.g., liberal-authoritarian (Kitschelt, 1994), new politics versus old politics (Franklin, 1992), integration versus demarcation (Kriesi et al., 2006), green/ alternative/libertarian versus traditional/authoritarian/nationalist [GALTAN] (Hooghe et al., 2002), social left-right (Coman, 2017), and post-materialist (Inglehart, 2018). ...

Higher Education and Political Corruption
  • Citing Article
  • January 2022

SSRN Electronic Journal

... There are two large groups of reasons lie at the basis of this fact. First of all, the plural nature of the epistemology of this discipline (Bautista, 2015;Gerring, 2012;Beltran, 1985) should be accommodated to extensive subjects as History, Sociology, Anthropology, and even Geography in countries like Spain or France. Thus, classical approaches as quantitative or qualitative analysis are accompanied by methodologies including critical-rational, historical, or comparative analysis, to name just a few. ...

Brainstorming
  • Citing Chapter
  • May 2018

... In Sections 3 and 4 we present our findings. Based on recommendations of social-science scholars, we expect authors assessing place-based water security case studies to pay attention to defining concepts (Gerring, 2012). Earlier research has highlighted water security as a contested concept (Pahl-Wostl et al., 2016), open to multiple interpretations (Zeitoun et al., 2013) and meanings across disciplines and methodological approaches (Cook and Bakker, 2012). ...

Statistical Inference
  • Citing Chapter
  • May 2018

... 41 See, Bennett and Checkel (2015). 42 We follow the convention of multi-method research and use the terms "universe of cases" and "population" interchangeably to refer to the broader group of cases to which we seek to generalize our findings (Gerring, 2011;Goertz & Mahoney, 2012;Gerring, 2016;Goertz, 2017Goertz, , 2020. Our scope conditions, discussed in Sect. ...

Applied Social Science Methodology
  • Citing Article
  • May 2018

... The grid was constructed following the analysis methodology used by Gerlak et al. [28]. They designed a codebook with multiple questions to evaluate articles according to three main criteria: first, they expect to see explicit research questions or goals related to learning, as well as the theoretical grounding of the questions or goals [49,50]; second, the cases and context for the research should be clearly identified, and the empirical research methods should be explicit and transparent to the reader [49]; third, they expect to see overall advancement in our knowledge about the phenomenon of interest through the literature as a whole [28]. ...

Applied Social Science Methodology
  • Citing Article
  • May 2018

... Small-N research with a limited number of cases in the population leads to several problems in the selection of cases. To avoid selection bias and provide validity to the scientific claims resulting from case study research, the cases were selected on the basis of Omnibus criteria as well as methodological considerations regarding comparability and variation on relevant dimensions (Gerring and Christenson 2017). For a comparison between EU and Russian hegemony, at least one case per hegemon was needed. ...

Applied Social Science Methodology: An Introductory Guide
  • Citing Book
  • April 2017

... As the features of labor migrations and demographics differ across countries, development of minoritized populations specific to that country becomes a key social issue for businesses (Yawar and Seuring, 2017). Hence, in this research, minorities are defined according to the majority population in a given context (Gerring et al., 2017) and are often ethnically, religiously or linguistically based, such as Turks in Bulgaria or Roma in Czech Republic (Roy and Kaye, 2002) or Indigenous communities in several countries (Quarshie et al., 2016). These minorities may (or may not) be migrant workers, which refers to "a person who migrates or who has migrated from one country to another with a view to being employed otherwise than on his [or her] own account and includes any person regularly admitted as a migrant worker" (International Labour Organization, 1975). ...

When are Minorities Worse Off? A Systematic Investigation of Size and Status
  • Citing Article
  • January 2017

... Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah menganalisis berbagai sumber akademik yang relevan dengan pembelajaran bahasa Arab berbasis game edukatif. (Gerring, 2017) Sumber data mencakup buku, jurnal, artikel, situs web, disertasi, tesis, dan dokumen cetak atau elektronik yang relevan. Metode ini tidak hanya membantu dalam mengumpulkan informasi yang relevan tetapi juga memastikan bahwa penelitian ini didasarkan pada kerangka teori dan temuan dari penelitian sebelumnya. ...

Qualitative Methods
  • Citing Article
  • June 2017

Annual Review of Political Science

... In his view, the frequent use of factual statements to express normative views constituted a major obstacle to a productive moral discourse. As is commonly recognised, conceptual clarity was a defining feature of Sartori's approach (Collier and Gerring, 2008). The analytical framework presented in TDR owes much to Oppenheim's articulated categorisations. ...

Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori