Joel D. Aberbach’s research while affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (46)


The United States: the political context of administrative reform
  • Chapter

November 2023

·

6 Reads

·

2 Citations

Joel D. Aberbach

·


Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements: a retrospective
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

March 2021

·

97 Reads

Interest Groups & Advocacy

We discuss the background and context of the research that went into Jack Walker’s 1991 book, Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Jack was uniquely situated to devise this research project, but it was also his reaction to dominant political theories of the time. The 1960s posed a puzzle: Groups that had previously been silent were getting mobilized. And yet the most powerful theoretical perspectives either said this was impossible, or that it was unwelcome. Jack thought otherwise. We discuss the reception of the book in the field, its impact on later scholars, and we speculate on what the profession lost when Jack was killed prematurely, before his book was completed, in a automobile accident.

View access options

Academic Autonomy and Freedom under Pressure: Severely Limited, or Alive and Kicking?

December 2018

·

76 Reads

·

36 Citations

Public Organization Review

Academic freedom and the autonomy of academic institutions (their freedom from outside interference) are core values in contemporary academic life. This article outlines changes that have taken place in the last few decades that impact academic freedom and autonomy to at least some degree. These include the increasing catering by universities to stake-holders in the environment, increasing professionalization of university administrations, an evolving pattern of broadening authority over internal university decision-making, and an increasing attention to student (i.e. customer) needs. Two case studies -- one of recent decisions in the University of California system and the other at the University of Oslo -- illustrate the theoretical points in the article and point to the need to know a lot more about academic autonomy and academic freedom, especially in an environment of changing management practices and scarce resource bases for many institutions. The cases were selected because of the authors’ familiarity with them and are examples meant to illuminate some of the challenges and complexities inherent in the phenomena and to inspire further research on academic freedom and autonomy utilizing the instrumental and institutional perspectives from organization theory that are the core of our theoretical analysis.



Why Reforms So Often Disappoint

November 2013

·

214 Reads

·

56 Citations

The American Review of Public Administration

This article examines why major reforms so often disappoint. It starts with an explication and analysis of perspectives for understanding why reforms often do not work out as hoped-rational comprehensive decision making and garbage can decision making, the latter in a "pure" version and in a modified version of the garbage can widely identified with the work of John Kingdon. We present these perspectives in a general way and then discuss how we can understand features of two central aspects of reforms based on these perspectives-the processes leading up to decisions on reforms and reform implementation processes. Some brief case studies are presented to illustrate some of the problems laid out in the theoretical part of the article. We conclude that nonincremental reform is vulnerable at every stage from conception to implementation and that although reforms are certainly not always doomed to failure, they are not often great candidates for success either.



The Appointment Process and the Administrative Presidency

March 2009

·

76 Reads

·

33 Citations

This essay reviews and analyzes the literature on presidential appointments in light of the growing tendency of chief executives to use the methods associated with what is now known as the administrative presidency. It closes with a discussion of the normative issues raised by the existing appointment system, one that appears to generate incompetence, distrust, and delays in filling posts.



Transforming the Presidency: The Administration of Ronald Reagan

January 2008

·

54 Reads

·

1 Citation

Ronald Reagan’s presidency is justly noted for its administrative style and practices. One prominent scholar, Terry Moe, even described Reagan, in an essay published after Reagan’s first term, as likely “the most administratively influential president of the modern period.”1 While Richard Nixon devel-oped what came to be known as the “administrative presidency,”2 it was Reagan, utilizing some tools not available to Nixon and unencumbered by Nixon’s numerous mistakes, who brought this approach to fruition. His mark is seen today in the way George W. Bush has staffed and organized his administration, and in its policy implementation practices.


The Challenges of Modernizing Tax Administration: Putting Customers First in Coercive Public Organizations

April 2007

·

381 Reads

·

52 Citations

Public Policy and Administration

Customer friendliness in tax systems typically characterized by control and enforcement appears to be a contradiction in terms. But many tax agencies, like other types of public organizations, have become more customer-oriented in the last few decades. This article, comparing the administration of tax systems in Norway and the USA, describes and analyzes the driving forces behind the consumer orientation movement in tax administration in the two nations and the dilemmas and effects of trying to balance control and service. Using a broad transformative perspective, we analyze structural and cultural changes in tax administration that are related to the increase in customer orientation and also consider the symbolic aspects of catering more to taxpayers. Norway and the USA have experienced similar structural reforms, but the two countries deviate rather sharply in other respects, particularly in the much larger impact of consumer-oriented reforms in the USA.


Citations (39)


... When thinking about the concept of organisational politics, especially in context of public or healthcare services, it is useful to make a distinction between the more formal (big 'P') politics of government, politicians, policy-making and regulation, and the more informal (small 'p') politics of competing interests, coalitions and cliques, and resistant groups that are found in virtually all workplaces [12][13][14][15][16]. The informal 'politics' of healthcare is experienced all too often by those who work within care services, but it is often regarded by practitioners as an irrational complication, rather than an integral or constructive feature of service organisation [17]. ...

Reference:

Healthcare leadership with political astuteness (HeLPA): A qualitative study of how service leaders understand and mediate the informal 'power and politics' of major health system change
Political and Bureaucratic Roles in Public Service Reorganization
  • Citing Chapter
  • April 1988

... Numerous scholars have examined the relationship based on a role theory approach (Aberbach et al., 1981). This approach recognises an interdependence between politics and administration as two overlapping and complementary spheres of a larger political-administrative system (Svara, 2001, Mouritzen and Svara, 2002, Jacobsen et al., 2021, Jacobsen, 2023. ...

Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies
  • Citing Book
  • December 1981

... Антон, Семюел Дж. Елдерсвельд, Рональд Інглхарт у 1981 році стверджували: «в добре впорядкованій державі політики формулюють мрії суспільства, а бюрократи обережно втілюють їх у життя» [7]. ...

Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies
  • Citing Book
  • June 2009

... Академическая свобода, в отличие от автономии, касается отдельного учёного и означает возможность преподавать и проводить исследования, не опасаясь наказания или увольнения [10]. При соблюдении принципов академической свободы администрация университета и внешние стейкхолдеры не вмешиваются в деятельность преподавателей и исследователей [28]. Изначально академическая свобода трактовалась как свобода преподавателя решать, чему и как учить [29]. ...

Academic Autonomy and Freedom under Pressure: Severely Limited, or Alive and Kicking?

Public Organization Review

... These studies illustrate several risks of change and learning, while problems of continuous organizational change are discussed more prominently in studies of organizational reforms (cf. Aberbach and Christensen, 2014). The study of (often unsuccessful) reforms highlights the risks of organizational change. ...

Why Reforms So Often Disappoint
  • Citing Article
  • November 2013

The American Review of Public Administration

... Dans cette lignée, Aberbach et Rockman (1990 L'application du modèle dit du principal-agent au contexte états-unien entre les personnes provenant d'une nomination politique et les fonctionnaires est soulevée, de même que le problème de « marchandage » (bargaining) entre le Congrès présent sur le long terme et le Président présent pour une courte durée déterminée (Spiller et Urbiztondo, 1994 : 465). En résulte ainsi un jeu entre plusieurs « principaux » pour le contrôle de la bureaucratie. ...

What Has Happened to the U.S. Senior Civil Service?
  • Citing Article
  • October 1990

The Brookings Review

... The paradigmatic views over this relationship bounced back and forth between statecentered and governance-centered approaches, between theories of state which are mainly concerned with the contemporary Western liberal democracies with a special focus on pluralism from the perspective of the new right and neo-pluralism approaches (Dryzek and Dunleavy 2009;Dyson 2009;Hay et al. 2006;Marinetto 2007;Nelson 2006;Vincent 1987;Dunleavy and O'Leary 1987: Preface, p. xii) and neo-statism theories which renew the central role of the state to the true or only claimed benefit of the individual's well-being and welfare (Lindberg 2020;Jessop 2011;Kennedy 2010;Jensen 2008;Bendix et al. 1992;Mitchell 1991;Evans et al. 1985;Nordlinger 1987Nordlinger , 1981, between state institutions and (political) culture-centered approaches on political leadership and governance, between international relations old and new theories from the Hobbesian to Lockean to Kantian, from Westphalian (Agnew 2009) to the global polity (Corry 2010), from Weberian to peacebuilding-oriented approaches (Lemay-Hébert 2011, 2013). No matter the specific area, polity studies have gradually emphasized their focus on the role individuals play or could play in polity complex dynamics. ...

On the Autonomy of the Democratic State
  • Citing Article
  • January 1983

John W. Sloan

·

Eric A. Nordlinger

·

Joel D. Aberbach

·

[...]

·

... 6 The survey question taps the degree to which outside parties influence key agency decision-making. The terminology in the ASAP survey follows the logic and terminology used by a variety of scholars (e.g. the seminal article by Aberbach and Rockman 1978), which employs the term " clientele groups " synonymously with " interest groups " . 7 The ICC indicates how the overall variance is divided between the model's levels (Raudenbush and Bryk 2002). ...

Bureaucrats and Clientele Groups: A View from Capitol Hill
  • Citing Article
  • November 1978

American Journal of Political Science

... Presidents have multiple methods at their disposal for exerting control over the administrative bureaucracy, including the issuance of executive orders, policy memoranda, and rules; influencing federal agency design; and appointments (Aberbach & Rockman, 1988;Dodds, 2022;Rogowski & Simko, 2022;Krause & O'Connell;Ouyang et al., 2017). By far, the most common form of politicization is the installation of preferred candidates into leadership positions throughout federal agencies (Lewis, 2008). ...

Mandates or Mandarins? Control and Discretion in Modern Administrative States
  • Citing Article
  • March 1988

Public Administration Review