Jingxia Wu’s research while affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Dynamic expansion of ER surrounding the symbiosomes in M.truncatula nodules. a–c) Representative SEM images of 3‐week‐old nodules in zone II (a), zone II‐III (b), and zone III (c). The red arrowheads indicate ER; s, symbiosome; m, mitochondrion; g, Golgi apparatus. Scale bars = 1 µm. d) Comparison of the ER width with 2D images in different rhizobial zones (II, n = 150; II‐III, n = 118; III, n = 182). e–g) 3D reconstruction derived from a 50‐µm‐thick section showing that ER (blue) forms a cage‐like structure to enclose symbiosomes (magenta) in zone II (e), zone II‐III (f), and zone III (g). The vertically arranged ones formed a group, showing the interaction between ER and symbiosomes from two different perspectives. Scale bars = 1 µm. At least 10 cells were examined, and 2 cells were reconstructed in each zone with the same results. h), Quantification and comparison of the surface area and the volume of 3D symbiosomes in different nodule zones (II, n = 10; II‐III, n = 6; III, n = 10). i, Quantification and comparison of the surface area and the volume of the 3D ER system surrounding the individual symbiosome in different nodule zones (symbiosomes: II, n = 3; II‐III, n = 3; III, n = 3). j–l) Representative partial enlarged display of the e‐g. Scale bars = 0.3 µm. m), Quantification and comparison of the ER contact frequency and area of each symbiosome in different nodule zones (symbiosomes: II, n = 3; II‐III, n = 3; III, n = 3). All data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical analysis was performed using the two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc comparisons. The letters indicate values with statistically significant (p < 0.05) and non‐significant (p > 0.05) differences, respectively.
Disturbance of ER dynamics influences nodule development. Plasmids of ProLjUb::MtRTNLB4‐1 and empty vector as control were introduced into Medicago A17 plants by hairy‐root transformation, respectively. GFP expressed from the construct was used as a selection marker for transformants and positive nodules were selected at 21days post‐inoculation (dpi). a–h) the nodule phenotype observation in the empty vector group (a, c, e, g) and the MtRTNLB4‐1 overexpression group (b, d, f, h), including nodule growth (a, b) nodule resin section (c, d) SEM image of the mature infected cell (e, f), the symbiosome and ER distribution by local enlargement of E, F (g, h). The red arrowheads indicate ER. i) Quantification and comparison of symbiosomes width between the MtRTNLB4‐1 overexpression group and the control group (MtRTNLB4‐1 overexpression, n = 40; Empty vector, n = 40). All data are shown as mean ±SD. The statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two‐sided Student's t‐test, ****p < 0.0001. j) 3D reconstruction of the interaction and distribution of symbiosomes (magenta) and ER (blue) in nodule‐infected cells of MtRTNLB4‐1 overexpression plants. Scale bars = 1 mm (a, b), 0.1 mm (c, d), 10 µm (e, f), 0.5 µm (g, h), 1 µm (left) and 0.8 µm (right) (j). At least two biological replicates were performed for each genotype.
UPR induction during legume‐rhizobia symbiosis. a,b) Fluorescent quantitative PCR detection of spliced MtbZIP60 (sMtbZIP60) (a) and MtBIP3 mRNA (b) in early symbiosis (0, 24, 48h post‐inoculation, pi). c) Relative expression levels of sMtbZIP60 and MtBIP3 genes in multiple organs of the same plant. d–f) Relative expression levels of MtIRE1A (d), MtIRE1B (e), and MtbZIP60 (f) along the symbiotic process are represented by distinct nodule sections. Zone I (meristematic), zone IId (distal) and zone IIp (proximal) constitute zone II (infection and differentiation zone). The data were obtained from the Symbimics website, curated from a previous publication,[³⁸], and represent the means of three technical replicates. Individual data points are not available. g‐i) Nodules at 14 dpi were dissected from M. truncatula transgenic lines expressing the β‐glucuronidase (GUS) reporter under the control of promoters of MtIRE1A (g), MtIRE1B (h) and MtbZIP60 (i) respectively and stained with GUS solution for semi‐section. Ruthenium red staining was performed for imaging. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. For (a–c), all data are shown as mean ±SD. n = 3, ****p < 0.0001 versus mock sample (a, b) and other organs (c). The statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two‐sided Student's t‐test in (a, b) and ANOVA with post‐hoc comparisons in (c‐f). The letters indicate values with statistically significant (p < 0.05) and non‐significant (p > 0.05) differences, respectively.
Deficiency in UPR function affects nodule symbiosis. a) Representative phenotypes in plant growth, from left to right: WT, ire1b‐1, ire1b‐2, bzip60‐1, bzip60‐2. b) Statistical analysis of the fresh weight of the above plants (WT n = 20, ire1b‐1 n = 20, ire1b‐2 n = 20, bzip60‐1 n = 19, bzip60‐2 n = 19). c) Representative phenotypes in nodules growth at 14 dpi, from left to right: WT, ire1b‐1, ire1b‐2, bzip60‐1, bzip60‐2. Scale bars = 2 mm. d) Quantitative statistical analysis on nodule length of the above plants (WT n = 36, ire1b‐1 n = 45, ire1b‐2 n = 40, bzip60‐1 n = 30, bzip60‐2 n = 33). e) Semi‐thin sections of nodules at 14 dpi were stained with 0.4% toluidine blue. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. f) Quantitative statistical results of area proportion in zone III. (WT, n = 24; ire1b‐1, n = 17; ire1b‐2, n = 24; bzip60‐1, n = 20; bzip60‐2, n = 20). g) Statistical result of pink nodules number at 14 dpi. n = 12. h) Acetylene reduction assay (ARA) revealed significantly decreased nitrogen‐fixing activities of ire1b‐1, ire1b‐2, bzip60‐1, and bzip60‐2 nodules at 20 dpi. Each dot represents the mean value from 55 nodules (WT, n = 3; ire1b‐1, n = 3; ire1b‐2, n = 3; bzip60‐1, n = 3; bzip60‐2, n = 3). All data are shown as means ±SD. The statistical significance of the differences was tested using one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc comparisons. Different and same letters indicate values with statistically significant (p < 0.05) and nonsignificant (p > 0.05) differences, respectively; The above nodules for semithin sections were collected from at least 60 plants with three biological replicates.
Alteration of ER biosynthesis in UPR mutants results in defects in nitrogen fixation. a–c) Representative SEM images of 2‐week‐old nodules in zone II (a), zone II‐III (b), and zone III (c), from left to right: WT, ire1b‐1, bzip60‐1. The ER lumen was indicated by the red arrow. Scale bars = 0.5 µm. d) Quantitative analysis of the ER lumen width in zone II. (WT, n = 300; ire1b‐1, n = 293; bzip60‐1, n = 297). e) Quantitative analysis of the ER lumen width in zone II‐III. (WT, n = 118; ire1b1, n = 183; bzip60‐1, n = 170). f) Quantitative analysis of the ER lumen width in zone III. (WT, n = 183; ire1b‐1, n = 185; bzip60‐1, n = 183). All data are shown as mean ±SD. Statistical analysis was performed with the one‐way ANOVA method with post‐hoc comparisons. The above SEM statistical results were randomly selected from 3 cells in each zone. g‐i) Transcript level of nifD (g), nifK (h), nifH (i) was determined by qRT‐PCR, and the rhizobia housekeeping gene rpoA was used for normalization, n = 6. All data are shown as mean ±SD. The statistical analysis was performed by the two‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc comparisons. The letters indicate values with statistically significant (p < 0.05) and non‐significant (p > 0.05) differences, respectively.

+1

Control of Rhizobia Endosymbiosis by Coupling ER Expansion with Enhanced UPR
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2025

·

138 Reads

Jing Ren

·

·

·

[...]

·

Legumes establish symbiosis with rhizobia by forming a symbiotic interface that enables cross‐kingdom exchanges of signaling molecules and nutrients. However, how host organelles interact with symbiosomes at the symbiotic interface remains elusive during rhizobia endosymbiosis. Here, symbiotic cells are reconstructed using 3D scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and uncover that the host endoplasmic reticulum (ER) undergoes dynamic expansion to gradually enwrap symbiosomes, facilitating their compartmentalization and endosymbiosis. Consistently, altering ER lamellar expansion by overexpressing MtRTNLBs, the reticulons responsible for ER tubulation, impairs rhizobia accommodation and symbiosome development. Intriguingly, unfolded protein response (UPR)‐marker genes, bZIP60 and IRE1A/B, show continuously activated expression during nodule development, and the two UPR‐deficient mutants, ire1b, and bzip60, exhibit compromised ER biogenesis and defective symbiosome development. Collectively, the findings underpin ER expansion and UPR activation as two key events in rhizobia accommodation and reveal an intrinsic coupling of ER morphology with proper UPR during root nodule symbiosis.

Download

Figure 1. Cellular processes of legume-rhizobium symbiosis.
Figure 2. The subcellular response during rhizobial infection in leguminous root hairs. (A) Fluorescence image of a 7-day-old nodule of Medicago with an IT in a curled root hair. Actin is pseudocolored in green, and rhizobia and ITs are magenta. Scale bars, 140 mm. (B) Curled root hair with an intact IT. Scale bar, 24 mm. (C) Rhizobia or purified Nod factors induce the expression of associated genes by directly binding Nod factors and Nod factor receptors, including nodulation pectate lyase (NPL), symbiosis-specific PME1 (SyPME1), SYMBIOTIC FORMIN 1 (SYFO1), membrane-associated flotillin 4 (FLOT4), and plantspecific remorin SYMREM1. Meanwhile, the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton in the tip of root hairs become transiently fragmented before recovering to guide IT initiation and elongation. The infectosome complex (VPY-LIN-EXO70H4-RPG) localizes to the IT tip and is required for maintaining IT polar growth by controlling secretion and vesicle trafficking. Cytoskeleton-associated proteins regulate the arrangement of the host cytoskeleton to guide the root-hair nucleus migration and IT elongation.
Cellular basis of the legume-rhizobium symbiosis

August 2024

·

77 Reads

·

3 Citations

Plant Communications

The legume–rhizobium symbiosis represents the most important system for terrestrial biological nitrogen fixation on land. Efficient nitrogen fixation during this symbiosis depends on successful rhizobial infection and complete endosymbiosis, which are achieved by complex cellular events including cell-wall remodeling, cytoskeletal reorganizations, and extensive membrane expansion and trafficking. In this review, we explore the dynamic remodeling of the plant-specific cell wall-membrane system-cytoskeleton (WMC) continuum during symbiotic nitrogen fixation. We focus on key processes linked to efficient nitrogen fixation, including rhizobial uptake, infection thread formation and elongation, rhizobial droplet release, cytoplasmic bridge formation, and rhizobial endosymbiosis. Additionally, we discuss the advanced techniques for investigating the cellular basis of root-nodule symbiosis and provide insights into the unsolved mysteries of robust symbiotic nitrogen fixation.


A legume kinesin controls vacuole morphogenesis for rhizobia endosymbiosis

October 2022

·

306 Reads

·

11 Citations

Nature Plants

Symbioses between legumes and rhizobia require establishment of the plant-derived symbiosome membrane, which surrounds the rhizobia and accommodates the symbionts by providing an interface for nutrient and signal exchange. The host cytoskeleton and endomembrane trafficking systems play central roles in the formation of a functional symbiotic interface for rhizobia endosymbiosis; however, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that the nodulation-specific kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein (nKCBP), a plant-specific microtubule-based kinesin motor, controls central vacuole morphogenesis in symbiotic cells in Medicago truncatula. Phylogenetic analysis further indicated that nKCBP duplication occurs solely in legumes of the clade that form symbiosomes. Knockout of nKCBP results in central vacuole deficiency, defective symbiosomes and abolished nitrogen fixation. nKCBP decorates linear particles along microtubules, and crosslinks microtubules with the actin cytoskeleton, to control central vacuole formation by modulating vacuolar vesicle fusion in symbiotic cells. Together, our findings reveal that rhizobia co-opted nKCBP to achieve symbiotic interface formation by regulating cytoskeletal assembly and central vacuole morphogenesis during nodule development.

Citations (2)


... In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on symbiotic processes such as legume-rhizobium symbiosis and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis; however, relatively little attention has been devoted to ectomycorrhizal symbiosis [15,16]. In this study, ectomycorrhizae were synthesized under greenhouse conditions using truffle ascocarps and chestnut trees, with systematic sampling and analysis conducted over an eight-month period. ...

Reference:

Description, Identification, and Growth of Ectomycorrhizae in Tuber sinense-Mycorrhized Castanea mollissima Seedlings
Cellular basis of the legume-rhizobium symbiosis

Plant Communications

... The nodulation-specific kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein (nKCBP), a plant-specific microtubulebased kinesin motor, evolves exclusively through gene duplication in legumes. Interestingly, despite nKCBP sharing conserved biochemical functions with its homologs, it demonstrates a nodule-rich expression pattern and is hijacked by rhizobia to control central vacuole formation and rhizobia endosymbiosis in Medicago symbiotic cells by modulating vacuolar vesicle fusion and crosslinking microtubules with actin (Zhang et al., 2022). ...

A legume kinesin controls vacuole morphogenesis for rhizobia endosymbiosis

Nature Plants