Jillian C. Banfield’s research while affiliated with Yale University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Weight bias as a function of discrimination salience and group identity. Note. Error bars show 95% CIs around the estimated means.
Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2020

·

158 Reads

·

12 Citations

·

Jillian C. Banfield

·

John F. Dovidio

Compared to many other forms of social bias, weight bias is pervasive, socially accepted, and difficult to attenuate. According to the common ingroup identity model, strategies that expand group inclusiveness may promote more positive intergroup attitudes and behaviors, particularly when people are aware of unjust treatment of others included within their shared identity. Considering that most people are not aware of the social justice issue of weight discrimination, we hypothesized that a common ingroup identity would be effective in reducing weight bias primarily when unfair weight-based treatment was made salient (i.e., that fat people experience discrimination in employment). Participants were randomly assigned to conditions following a 3 (discrimination salience: weight discrimination, height discrimination, control) × 2 (group identity: common ingroup, control) design and completed an evaluative measure of weight bias. Results revealed a significant interaction, showing that when weight discrimination was salient, participants in the common ingroup identity condition reported less weight bias than participants in the group identity control condition. When a common ingroup identity was emphasized, weight bias was lower when weight discrimination was salient compared to when height discrimination was salient and the control condition in which nothing about discrimination was mentioned. These results were not moderated by participant weight. This study demonstrates that a common ingroup identity can be effective in reducing weight bias if a cue is provided that fat people experience disparate and unjust outcomes in employment. Given the serious consequences of weight bias for health and well-being, and the relative ease of implementing this prejudice-reduction intervention, the common ingroup identity model has potential application for reducing weight bias in a range of real-world settings. However, these findings should be considered preliminary until they are replicated in well-powered and pre-registered future research.

Download

Citations (1)


... Nonorganizational research already points to remedies for rooting out antifat bias in life (Brochu et al., 2020;Hilbert, 2016); interventions can and do work. We need research that applies them to an organizational context. ...

Reference:

Best practices for weight at work research
Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient