Jiayue Liu’s research while affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Fig. 1 Control paradigms investigated in this study: A) Human hand control. B) Model-based biomimetic control. C) Proportional linear feedback control.
Fig. 8 Performance metrics in the single-finger experiment. A) and B) Binomial outcomes, 720 dots are categorized as Success/Failure trials (A) or trials with/without breakage (B). Trials are also color-coded to 6 Indexes of Difficulty. Contralateral hand shows the more successful trials and the fewer occurrences of breakage; C) Variability of rise time; D) Variability of overshoot; E) Throughput (left panel) and Calibrated Throughput (right panel); F) shows the linear relationship between completion time (CT) and index of difficulty (ID) and the average completion time; G) shows the force control stability, and the smaller FMRMSE, the higher the stability; H) shows the force similarity (FS) between the force generated by the prosthetic hand and the contralateral hand. (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
Fig. 9 Performance metrics in the full-hand experiment. A) and B) Binomial outcomes, 720 dots are categorized as Success/Failure trials (A) or trials with/without breakage (B). Contralateral hand shows the more successful trials and the fewer occurrences of breakage; C) Variability of rise time; D) Variability of overshoot; E) Throughput (left panel) and Calibrated Throughput (right panel); F) shows the linear relationship between completion time (CT) and index of difficulty (ID) and the average completion time in each control strategy; G) shows the force control stability, and the smaller FMRMSE, the higher the stability; H) shows the force similarity (FS) between the force generated by prosthetic hand and the contralateral hand. (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
Evaluation of Model-Based Biomimetic Control of Prosthetic Finger Force for Grasp
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2021

·

156 Reads

·

20 Citations

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

·

·

Jiayue Liu

·

[...]

·

Restoring neuromuscular reflex properties in the control of a prosthetic hand may potentially approach human-level grasp functions in the prosthetic hand. Previous studies have confirmed the feasibility of real-time emulation of a monosynaptic spinal reflex loop for prosthetic control [1]. This study continues to explore how well the biomimetic controller could enable the amputee to perform force-control tasks that required both strength and error-tolerance. The biomimetic controller was programmed on a neuromorphic chip for real-time emulation of reflex. The model-calculated force of finger flexor was used to drive a torque motor, which pulled a tendon that flexed prosthetic fingers. Force control ability was evaluated in a “press-without-break” task, which required participants to press a force transducer toward a target level, but never exceeding a breakage threshold. The same task was tested either with the index finger or the full hand; the performance of the biomimetic controller was compared to a proportional linear feedback (PLF) controller, and the contralateral normal hand. Data from finger pressing task in 5 amputees showed that the biomimetic controller and the PLF controller achieved 95.8% and 66.9% the performance of contralateral finger in success rate; 50.0% and 25.1% in stability of force control; 59.9% and 42.8% in information throughput; and 51.5% and 38.4% in completion time. The biomimetic controller outperformed the PLF controller in all performance indices. Similar trends were observed with full-hand grasp task. The biomimetic controller exhibited capacity and behavior closer to contralateral normal hand. Results suggest that incorporating neuromuscular reflex properties in the biomimetic controller may provide human-like capacity of force regulation, which may enhance motor performance of amputees operating a tendon-driven prosthetic hand.

Download

Neuromorphic Model of Reflex for Realtime Human-Like Compliant Control of Prosthetic Hand

August 2020

·

259 Reads

·

31 Citations

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Current control of prosthetic hands is ineffective when grasping deformable, irregular, or heavy objects. In humans, grasping is achieved under spinal reflexive control of the musculotendon skeletal structure, which produces a hand stiffness commensurate with the task. We hypothesize that mimicking reflex on a prosthetic hand may improve grasping performance and safety when interacting with human. Here, we present a design of compliant controller for prosthetic hand with a neuromorphic model of human reflex. The model includes 6 motoneuron pools containing 768 spiking neurons, 1 muscle spindle with 128 spiking afferents, and 1 modified Hill-type muscle. Models are implemented using neuromorphic hardware with 1 kHz real-time computing. Experimental tests showed that the prosthetic hand could sustain a 40 N load compared to 95 N for an adult. Stiffness range was adjustable from 60 to 640 N/m, about 46.6% of that of human hand. The grasping velocity could be ramped up to 14.4 cm/s, or 24% of the human peak velocity. The complaint control could switch between free movement and contact force when pressing a deformable beam. The amputee can achieve a 47% information throughput of healthy humans. Overall, the reflex-enabled prosthetic hand demonstrated the attributes of human compliant grasping with the neuromorphic model of spinal neuromuscular reflex.



Citations (3)


... Recently, a biorealistic control approach that emulates neuromuscular reflex control of human upper limb system based on computational models has been used in prosthetic control [33], [34], [35]. The biorealistic control prosthetic hand could recapture human-like neuromuscular properties in the virtual environment [33], and has been verified to have more superior performance in evaluations of force control and functional tasks compared to traditional proportional control, particularly in more delicate tasks [34], [35]. ...

Reference:

Closed-Loop Force Control by Biorealistic Hand Prosthesis With Visual and Tactile Sensory Feedback
Evaluation of Model-Based Biomimetic Control of Prosthetic Finger Force for Grasp

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

... In previous studies, we used fast computational neuromorphic technology to design a prosthetic hand actuated by a single flexor muscle model. This neuromorphic model incorporated a series of alpha motor neuron pools, a Hill muscle model, a spindle model, and a monosynaptic spinal reflex [28]. Previous studies confirmed the feasibility of replicating human-like force regulation in a prosthetic hand [29]. ...

Neuromorphic Model of Reflex for Realtime Human-Like Compliant Control of Prosthetic Hand

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

... Fuzzy with PID controller responds better than the [12].Two popular methods implemented and analyzed of The design of the PID controller for the DC motor speed control system [11].The fuzzy PD type controller tuned in parallel with the PID type controller [5]. It still needs fuzzy parameters adjustment [15].The ability and force of the prosthetic hand to perform loading and controlling [16]. Explore its potential compliant control for prosthetic hand [17].The biomimetic control system with The prosthetic hand By [16]. ...

Design of a Biomimetic Control System for Tendon-driven Prosthetic Hand
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • October 2018