Jianhua Yin’s research while affiliated with Xiamen University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (17)


Unravelling the Oxygen Evolution Mechanism of Lithium‐Rich Antifluorite Prelithiation Agent Based on Anionic Oxidation
  • Article

March 2025

·

17 Reads

Angewandte Chemie

Yuanlong Zhu

·

Ruoyu Xu

·

Yichun Zheng

·

[...]

·

Shi‐Gang Sun

Developing sacrificial cathode prelithiation technology to compensate for irreversible lithium loss is crucial for enhancing the energy density of lithium‐ion batteries. Antifluorite Li‐rich Li 5 FeO 4 (LFO) is a promising prelithiation agent due to its high theoretical capacity (867 mAh g ⁻¹ ) and superior decomposition dynamic (<4.0 V vs. Li/Li ⁺ ). However, the oxygen evolution mechanism in LFO remains unclear, limiting its application as an ideal prelithiation agent. Herein, we systematically track the full lifecycle oxygen footprint in LFO lattice, electrolyte and solid electrolyte interface (SEI). We demonstrate the lattice mismatch induced by the quasi‐disorder rocksalt intermediate phase can activate the lattice oxygen oxidation promoting the dimerization to O 2 . Specifically, in contrast to the O─O dimers formed within typical anionic‐redox active cathodes, the oxidation of lattice oxygen in LFO generates O ⁻ stabilized in Li 6 ‐O configuration. Significantly, a pair of edge‐sharing Li 6 ‐O configurations transforms into a superoxo dimer, which further evolves into O 2 via a ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer process. Moreover, we demonstrate that nucleophilic intermediates threaten the stability of electrolytes and SEI. Leveraging the insights above, we offer comprehensive perspectives for the modification of ideal prelithiation agents.


a) Galvanostatic charge profile of Li5FeO4 with 4.5 V cutoff voltage at a current density of 20 mA g⁻¹. Charging from OCV to 3.85 V and 3.85 V to 4.5 V are denoted as the stage I (SI) and stage II (SII), respectively. The structure of the Li5FeO4 unit cell is inserted. b) Rietveld refinements of sXRD patterns collected at OCV, 3.85 V, and 3.95 V. c) 2D model of sXRD patterns corresponding to the different states of charge in b.
a) Fe K‐edge EXAFS fitting results of Fe‐O shell in R‐space based on LFO collected at different states of charge. Corresponding coordination environment compositions are shown in pie charts, whose coordination number (C. N.) is 4.0 in the yellow region and is 6.0 in the red region. b) The mean square relative displacements (MSRD, σ²) of Fe‐O bonds based on LFO collected by fitting the corresponding EXAFS spectra. The delithiation amount from 0 to 4 corresponds to the charge state from OCV to 4.5 V by sequence. c) Fe K‐edge XANES based on LFO at different states of charge. d) Edge positions of Fe K‐edge XANES based on LFO collected at different states of charge. e) Diagram of LFO structure distribution during the entire phase transition process, where each color block represents a region with a long‐range order phase. Corresponding local atomic geometry configurations are attached next to the color blocks. The dotted circles around O atoms indicate the variations in interatomic distance induced by the deviations of the actual atomic positions from the equilibrium positions, which reflects the degree of local disorder under specific states of charge.
a) The top panel shows the galvanostatic charge curve for the initial charging process of the LFO at a current density of 40 mA g⁻¹. Five points are labelled in the charge curve: OCV, 3.5 V, 3.85 V, 3.95 V and 4.5 V, respectively. The middle panel shows quantitative TMS for O2 and CO2 collected from LFO at corresponding states of charge. The bottom panel shows DEMS results of corresponding time‐resolved evolution rates for O2 and CO2 during initial charging. b) O K‐edge SXAS spectra of the LFO at TFY modes collected at different states of charge showing the emergence of the peak at around 528 eV. c) O K‐edge RIXS maps of the LFO collected at OCV, 3.85 V, 3.95 V and 4.5 V, respectively. The anionic‐redox feature emerges at an excitation energy of around 528 eV and an emission energy of around 526 eV. d) Electrochemical in situ SERS of LFO during charging to 4.5 V. SERS peak intensities for carbonate (≈1080 cm⁻¹), and superoxide (O─O) (≈1108 cm⁻¹) are indicated, respectively. e) Delithiation amount‐dependent relative intensity of superoxide (red dots) and carbonate (blue dots) in SERS during charging.
pDOS of the O 2p orbitals and Fe 3d orbitals of O ions and first nearest Fe ions based on different local coordination environments in x = 2 (Li5‐xFeO4), including a) Li6–O configurations where hole polarons localize on oxygen (O⁻) to form in‐gap states, b) a pair of edge‐sharing Li6–O configurations exhibiting localized unpaired non‐bonding O‐p character on the Fermi level before relaxation, c) superoxo dimer after relaxation. d) Fe Bader charge change during delithiation process. The corresponding oxygen evolution process undergoes dimerization of lattice oxygen (O²⁻) to superoxo dimer (O2⁻) and further transforms into O2 through LMCT. e) Calculated O vacancy formation energy (red dots) and lattice mismatch (blue dots) as a function of Li removal in Li5FeO4.
a) Summary of phase transitions and Fe/O contribution forms in charge compensation process of LFO at different states of charge. b) The schematized rearrangement pattern of the electronic band structure during the charge process of LFO, where U and ΔCT represent coulombic interactions in the d shell and TM–O charge transfer, respectively. The pristine state is described by a partially filled anti‐(TM‐O) band, split by U into an empty upper Hubbard band (UHB) and a lower Hubbard band (LHB). A fully occupied O 2p lone pairs states (|O2p) band overlaps significantly with the LHB near the Fermi level (U/2 ∼ ΔCT), which allows simultaneous cationic and anionic oxidation. The oxidation of O generates hole polaron O⁻, which is stabilized by Li6‐O configuration. At SI, O⁻ species is stable as long as ΔCT > ΔO─Oσ*, and the anionic oxidation is reversible within the lattice. A pair of edge‐sharing Li6‐O configuration promotes O─O pairing out of lattice. Further charge from SI to SII, the narrow |O2p band splits into discrete σ, π, π*, and σ* bands. As a result of the depletion of electrons from the metallic d‐band and the concomitant U increase, the metallic band lies below the π* states of the oxidized species (ΔO─Oπ* > ΔCT), enabling the formation of O2⁻. In the meantime, a significant charge transfer can occur from oxygen to the metal center (LMCT process). The electron depletion from the |O2p finally leads to further evolution of superoxo dimer into O2 via a reductive elimination process.

+3

Unravelling the Oxygen Evolution Mechanism of Lithium‐Rich Antifluorite Prelithiation Agent Based on Anionic Oxidation
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

March 2025

·

35 Reads

Developing sacrificial cathode prelithiation technology to compensate for irreversible lithium loss is crucial for enhancing the energy density of lithium‐ion batteries. Antifluorite Li‐rich Li5FeO4 (LFO) is a promising prelithiation agent due to its high theoretical capacity (867 mAh g⁻¹) and superior decomposition dynamic (<4.0 V vs. Li/Li⁺). However, the oxygen evolution mechanism in LFO remains unclear, limiting its application as an ideal prelithiation agent. Herein, we systematically track the full lifecycle oxygen footprint in LFO lattice, electrolyte and solid electrolyte interface (SEI). We demonstrate the lattice mismatch induced by the quasi‐disorder rocksalt intermediate phase can activate the lattice oxygen oxidation promoting the dimerization to O2. Specifically, in contrast to the O─O dimers formed within typical anionic‐redox active cathodes, the oxidation of lattice oxygen in LFO generates O⁻ stabilized in Li6‐O configuration. Significantly, a pair of edge‐sharing Li6‐O configurations transforms into a superoxo dimer, which further evolves into O2 via a ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer process. Moreover, we demonstrate that nucleophilic intermediates threaten the stability of electrolytes and SEI. Leveraging the insights above, we offer comprehensive perspectives for the modification of ideal prelithiation agents.

View access options


Depth‐of‐Discharge Dependent Capacity Decay Induced by the Accumulation of Oxidized Lattice Oxygen in Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode

December 2024

·

61 Reads

·

1 Citation

More and more basic practical application scenarios have been gradually ignored/disregarded, in fundamental research on rechargeable batteries, e.g. assessing cycle life under various depths‐of‐discharge (DODs). Herein, although benefit from the additional energy density introduced by anionic redox, we critically revealed that lithium‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes present anomalously poor capacity retention at low‐DOD cycling, which is essentially different from typical layered cathodes (e.g. NCM), and pose a formidable impediment to the practical application of LRLO. We systemically demonstrated that DOD‐dependent capacity decay is induced by the anionic redox and accumulation of oxidized lattice oxygen (Oⁿ⁻). Upon low‐DOD cycling, the accumulation of Oⁿ⁻ and the persistent presence of vacancies in the transition metal (TM) layer intensified the in‐plane migration of TM, exacerbating the expansion of vacancy clusters, which further facilitated detrimental out‐of‐plane TM migration. As a result, the aggravated structural degradation of LRLO at low‐DOD impeded reversible Li⁺ intercalation, resulting in rapid capacity decay. Furthermore, prolonged accumulation of Oⁿ⁻ persistently corroded the electrode‐electrolyte interface, especially negative for pouch‐type full‐cells with the shuttle effect. Once the “double‐edged sword” effect of anionic redox being elucidated under practical condition, corresponding modification strategies/routes would become distinct for accelerating the practical application of LRLO.


Depth‐of‐Discharge Dependent Capacity Decay Induced by the Accumulation of Oxidized Lattice Oxygen in Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode

November 2024

·

26 Reads

Angewandte Chemie

More and more basic practical application scenarios have been gradually ignored/disregarded, in fundamental research on rechargeable batteries, e.g. assessing cycle life under various depths‐of‐discharge (DODs). Herein, although benefit from the additional energy density introduced by anionic redox, we critically revealed that lithium‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes present anomalously poor capacity retention at low‐DOD cycling, which is essentially different from typical layered cathodes (e.g. NCM), and pose a formidable impediment to the practical application of LRLO. We systemically demonstrated that DOD‐dependent capacity decay is induced by the anionic redox and accumulation of oxidized lattice oxygen (On‐). Upon low‐DOD cycling, the accumulation of On‐ and the persistent presence of vacancies in the transition metal (TM) layer intensified the in‐plane migration of TM, exacerbating the expansion of vacancy clusters, which further facilitated detrimental out‐of‐plane TM migration. As a result, the aggravated structural degradation of LRLO at low‐DOD impeded reversible Li+ intercalation, resulting in rapid capacity decay. Furthermore, prolonged accumulation of On‐ persistently corroded the electrode‐electrolyte interface, especially negative for pouch‐type full‐cells with the shuttle effect. Once the “double‐edged sword” effect of anionic redox being elucidated under practical condition, corresponding modification strategies/routes would become distinct for accelerating the practical application of LRLO.



Decoupling the Failure Mechanism of Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode During High‐Temperature Storage in Pouch‐Type Full‐Cell: A Practical Concern on Anionic Redox Reaction

In addressing the global climate crisis, the energy storage performance of Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) under extreme conditions, particularly for high‐energy‐density Li‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathode, is of the essence. Despite numerous researches into the mechanisms and optimization of LRLO cathodes under ideal moderate environment, there is a dearth of case studies on their practical/harsh working environments (e.g., pouch‐type full‐cell, high‐temperature storage), which is a critical aspect for the safety and commercial application. In this study, using pouch‐type full‐cells as prototype investigation target, the study finds the cell assembled with LRLO cathode present severer voltage decay than typical NCM layered cathode after high‐temperature storage. Further decoupling elucidates the primary failure mechanism is the over‐activation of lattice oxidized oxygen (aggravate by high‐temperature storage) and subsequent escape of oxidized oxygen species (Oⁿ⁻), which disrupts transition metal (TM) coordination and exacerbates electrolyte decomposition, leading to severe TM dissolution, interfacial film reconstruction, and harmful shuttle effects. These chain behaviors upon high‐temperature storage significantly influence the stability of both electrodes, causing substantial voltage decay and lithium loss, which accelerates full‐cell failure. Although the anionic redox reaction can bring additional energy, but the escape of metastable Oⁿ⁻ species would introduce new concerns in practical cell working conditions.


(a) Refined synchrotron radiation XRD patterns of the pristine layered LCO and lithiated spinel LCO. Corresponding schematic illustrations of structures are shown in the inset. (b) Selected 2θ regions and component analysis. (c) Typical galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles curves of layered LCO and lithiated spinel LCO at a current density of 0.1C (1C = 200 mA g⁻¹) for 3–4.2 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). The inset depicts a schematic diagram of the reversible phase transition between Li0.5CoO2 and LiCoO2 within the spinel structure. (d) Main peaks of the in situ XRD patterns for layered LCO (left) and lithiated spinel LCO (right), along with the galvanostatic charge–discharge curve from 3 to 4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). The peak shift is denoted as ΔDE when the d-spacing reaches its maximum expansion and as ΔDs when the d-spacing reaches its minimum shrinkage. (e) The design principle of the layered-spinel heterostructure modification strategies for LCO
(a) Refined synchrotron radiation XRD pattern of the pristine layered-spinel LCO. The inset displays selected 2θ regions and component analysis. (b) Charge–discharge profiles and the corresponding dQ/dV chart during discharge of the layered-spinel LCO at a current density of 0.1C for 3–4.2 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). (c) HR-TEM image of the layered-spinel LCO. The FFT and IFFT images obtained from the corresponding regions of the cathode are displayed on the right side. (d) Main peaks of the in situ XRD patterns for the layered-spinel LCO and galvanostatic charge–discharge curve from 3 to 4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). The c lattice parameters of the layered (yellow) and spinel (purple) phases, obtained from the refinement, are shown in the right panel
Electrochemical performance of different LCO batteries. (a and e) Charge–discharge profiles of layered LCO and layered-spinel LCO at 0.1C, in a voltage range of (a) 3–4.2 V and (e) 3–4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). (b–d) Cycle performance of different cell configurations: (b) layered-spinel LCO, (c) 600 °C 1 h- LCO (spinel ratio > 10%), and (d) 700 °C 1 h- LCO (spinel ratio < 10%), compared to the layered LCO at a current density of 0.1C for 3–4.2 V (vs. Li/Li⁺). (f) Cycle performance comparison of the layered-spinel LCO and the layered LCO at 0.1C for 3–4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺)
(a–c) Normalized ex situ Co K-edge XANES spectra at states of pristine, 4.2 V and 4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺) for (a) layered LCO, (b) layered-spinel LCO and (c) spinel LCO. (d–f) Co K-edge EXAFS spectra at states of pristine, 4.2 V and 4.6 V (vs. Li/Li⁺) for (d) layered LCO, (e) layered-spinel LCO and (f) spinel LCO
(a and b) Refined NPD pattern of pristine LT-LCO with two different main phases: (a) spinel and (b) cubic-layered. (c and d) HR-TEM images and corresponding FFT/IFFT images of (c) pristine LT-LCO and (d) LT-LCO after the 1st cycle. (e) A schematic illustration of the lithium diffusion pathway within the spinel structure. (f) A schematic illustration of lithium diffusion and deterioration analysis for LT-LCO
Does “zero-strain” lithiated spinel serve as a strain retardant and an irreversible phase transition regulator for layered oxide cathodes?

September 2024

·

63 Reads

Layered oxide cathodes encounter structural challenges during cycling, prompting the exploration of an ingenious heterostructure strategy, which incorporates stable components into the layered structure as strain regulators to enhance materials cycle stability. Despite considerable research efforts, identifying suitable, convenient, and cost-effective materials and methods remains elusive. Herein, focused on lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2), we utilized its low-temperature polymorph as a strain-retardant embedded within a cathode. Our findings reveal that the low-temperature component, exhibiting zero-strain characteristic, adopts a complex configuration with a predominant lithiated spinel structure, also featuring both cubic-layered and typical-layered configurations. But this composite cathode exhibits a sluggish lithium-ion transport rate, attributed to Co&Li dislocation at the dual structural boundaries and the formation of cobalt(iii) oxide. This investigation presents a pioneering endeavor in employing heterostructure strategies, underscoring the critical role of such strategies in component selection, which ultimately propels the advancement of layered oxide cathode candidates for Li-ion battery technology.


Characterization of Na2O‐based high capacity presodiation agent. a) Voltage profile for (Na2O + NiO) composite cathode at 10 mA g⁻¹ with a 4.5 V upper cutoff potential; the inset shows the pure Na2O cathode capacity (<15 mAh g⁻¹) at cutoff 4.5 V. b) Schematic illustration of the preparation procedure of NNO composite presodiation agent by high‐energy ball milling. c) sXRD pattern and d) NPD pattern of NNO presodiation agent and the results of fitting via Rietveld refinement. e) The density of states (DOS) of Na2O (top) and Ni–Na2O (bottom). f) Gibbs free energy diagrams during the pure Na2O and Ni–Na2O decomposition process.
The structural and local covalent environment evolution during NNO decomposition. a) Ex situ sXRD patterns and the results of fitting via Rietveld refinement of NNO presodiation agent in different voltages. The sXRD peak intensities of Ni–Na2O presodiation agent at 2θ = 14.0°, 19.8°, 23.3°, 24.3°, and 28.3° (Ni–Na2O), 2θ = 16.4°, 18.9°, and 26.9° (NiO), respectively. b–d) TEM images of charged NNO presodiation agent cathode at pristine, charge 4.3 V, and discharge 1.5 V. Insets present the corresponding SEAD patterns. The red and yellow marker lines represent the NiO and Ni–Na2O phases, respectively, and the white ones represent the amorphous phase. e) Ni K‐edge X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) spectra at different voltage states. Upper left inset: enlarged pre‐edge of Ni K‐edge XANES spectra and a schematic illustration of Ni–O tetrahedral (tetra.) configuration (Ni in Na2O) and octahedral (octa.) configuration (Ni in NiO). Inset below right: edge positions of Ni K‐edge at different voltage states. f) Ni K‐edge EXAFS spectra (weighted by k³) of pristine and charged 4.5 V NNO presodiation agent. The Ni molar percentage pie chart of Ni–Na2O (green region) and NiO (purple region) in NNO presodiation agent. The fitted Ni–O coordination numbers (C.N.) are shown in the inset.
Analysis of oxygen behavior upon Na2O oxidation in NNO. a) The top panel shows the galvanostatic charge curve for the initial charging process of the NNO presodiation agent cathode at a current density of 50 mA g⁻¹. Five points are labeled in the charge curve: OCV, 3.25 V,3.45 V, 3.65 V, and 4.5 V, respectively. b) The middle panel shows OEMS results of corresponding time‐resolved evolution rates for O2 and CO2 during initial charging. c) TMS result: amounts of O2 and CO2 collected from the NNO presodiation agent plates with different specific voltages. d) O K‐edge XANES spectra of the NNO presodiation agent cathode and standard samples at TEY modes. The peak at 533 eV represents oxygen in the antifluorite structure of Na2O; the peak at 531.4 eV represents σ* (O─O) peroxide species; and the peak at 531.2 eV represents the hybridized state of O 2p and Ni 3d orbitals in NiO. e) The schematic diagram illustrating the dynamics of electrochemical transfer oxidation process during the charging of Ni–Na2O. The electronic structure of Na2O exhibits a charge transfer electronic ground state in the reduced phase (left). The O (2p) lone pairs denote |O2p. The splitting of the O 2p narrow band into distinct σ, π, π*, and σ* states is illustrated by the red (ΔσO─O) and green (ΔπO─O) arrows, with respect to the conversion of O─O dimer species (bottom horizontal axis).
Electrochemical performance after presodiation. a) Initial charge profiles of Na3V2(PO4)3 (NVP) and Na2/3Ni2/3Mn1/3O2 (NNMO) with n wt % (n = 0%, 5%, and 10%) NNO presodiation agent cathodes at 10 mA g⁻¹ in the range from 2.5 to 4.3 V and from 2.0 to 4.15 V, respectively. b) Cycling performance of NVP without or with NNO presodiation agent cathodes at 50 mA g⁻¹ in the range from 2.5 to 4.3 V. Inset: the bar chart corresponds to the charge and discharge capacity of the initial cycle at 10 mA g⁻¹. c) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of HC||NVP without or with 10 wt% NNO presodiation agent coin‐type full‐cell at 10 mA g⁻¹ (1 st) and 50 mA g⁻¹ (5–50 th) in the range from 1.0 to 4.2 V. d) Cycling performance of HC||NVP without or with 10 wt% NNO presodiation agent coin‐type full‐cell in the range from 1.0 to 4.2 V. e) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of HC||NNMO without or with 10 wt% NNO presodiation agent coin‐type full‐cell at 10 mA g⁻¹ (1st) and 50 mA g⁻¹ (5–50 th) in the range from 0.5 to 4.0 V. f) Cycling performance of HC||NNMO without or with 10 wt% NNO presodiation agent coin‐type full‐cell in the range from 0.5 to 4.0 V.
The impact of NNO on the electrode–electrolyte interface and associated perspective on presodiation agent. a) TOF‐SIMS characterization of pure NVP and NVP‐NNO cycled cathode electrodes after 150 cycles. The normalized depth profiles of the interface and bulk fragments illustrate the structure of CEI. b) 3D renderings of selected secondary ion fragments of different CEI. The sputtered volume is 100 µm (length) × 100 µm (width) × 150 nm (height). c) TEM images of NVP‐NNP after 200 cycles. The IFFT results for the surface and bulk regions are also listed in the figure. The light green‐dashed ground state region is identified as NVP structure, white is defined as carbon layer region, and yellow is assessed as a CEI architecture. d) Scheme of CEI formation and changes on NVP and NVP‐NNO cathodes summarized from characterization data in FEC‐containing electrolytes. e) Perspectives for cathode presodiation agent.
Achieving High‐Capacity Cathode Presodiation Agent Via Triggering Anionic Oxidation Activity in Sodium Oxide

July 2024

·

90 Reads

·

12 Citations

Compensating for the irreversible loss of limited active sodium (Na) is crucial for enhancing the energy density of practical sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) full‐cell, especially when employing hard carbon anode with initially lower coulombic efficiency. Introducing sacrificial cathode presodiation agents, particularly those that own potential anionic oxidation activity with a high theoretical capacity, can provide additional sodium sources for compensating Na loss. Herein, Ni atoms are precisely implanted at the Na sites within Na2O framework, obtaining a (Na0.89Ni0.05□0.06)2O (Ni–Na2O) presodiation agent. The synergistic interaction between Na vacancies and Ni catalyst effectively tunes the band structure, forming moderate Ni–O covalent bonds, activating the oxidation activity of oxygen anion, reducing the decomposition overpotential to 2.8 V (vs Na/Na⁺), and achieving a high presodiation capacity of 710 mAh/g≈Na2O (Na2O decomposition rate >80%). Incorporating currently‐modified presodiation agent with Na3V2(PO4)3 and Na2/3Ni2/3Mn1/3O2 cathodes, the energy density of corresponding Na‐ion full‐cells presents an essential improvement of 23.9% and 19.3%, respectively. Further, not limited to Ni–Na2O, the structure–function relationship between the anionic oxidation mechanism and electrode–electrolyte interface fabrication is revealed as a paradigm for the development of sacrificial cathode presodiation agent.



Citations (6)


... Reproduced with permission. [13] Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. f) Operating and average (red dot) voltage comparison of different cathode materials with LSV results of electrolytes in LIBs and SIBs. ...

Reference:

A Perspective on Pathways Toward Commercial Sodium‐Ion Batteries
Elucidating the Structural Evolution of O3-type NaNi 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 : A Prototype Cathode for Na-Ion Battery
  • Citing Article
  • November 2024

Journal of the American Chemical Society

... Furthermore, uneven contact can result in inconsistent pre-sodiation, affecting battery capacity retention. [14] Inorganic additives have been explored for pre-sodiation purposes, including NaN 3 , [17,18] Na 2 O, [19,20] Na 3 P, [21] and NaCrO 2 . [22] However, their application is complicated by issues such as gas production, residual "dead mass," toxicity, and explosion risk. ...

Achieving High‐Capacity Cathode Presodiation Agent Via Triggering Anionic Oxidation Activity in Sodium Oxide

... [11][12][13] Simultaneously, accompanied by the irreversible over-oxidation of intermediate oxygen species, O 2 is released and further catalyze electrolyte decomposition and interfacial side reactions, which inevitably give rise to notable irreversibility in phase transitions, resulting in ultralow initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE), and fast capacity/voltage decay. [16][17][18][19] To surmount these formidable obstacles, in situ construction of a stable CEI on the cathode surface through electrolyte engineering can effectively reduce the direct contact between the cathode and electrolyte, thereby minimizing interfacial parasitic reactions. [18,20] However, the issues of nucleophilic attacks and irreversible anionic redox still lack sufficient attention in electrolyte strategies, resulting in limited improvements in initial capacity utilization, interfacial stability, and kinetics. ...

Gradient Interphase Engineering Enabled by Anionic Redox for High-Voltage and Long-Life Li-Ion Batteries
  • Citing Article
  • February 2024

Journal of the American Chemical Society

... With the widespread adoption of new energy vehicles and large-scale energy storage devices, traditional Li + batteries are approaching their limits in the energy storage capacity. [1][2][3][4] Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, with their high theoretical energy density (2600 W h kg À 1 ) and low cost, are emerging as promising candidates for the next generation of energy storage system. [5] However, the real-world application of LiÀ S batteries has encountered significant obstacles, primarily due to limited practical energy density, low coulombic efficiency, and poor cycling stability. ...

Lattice Engineering on Li 2 CO 3 ‐Based Sacrificial Cathode Pre‐lithiation Agent for Improving The Energy Density of Li‐Ion Battery Full‐Cell

... In comparison with the white line peak (I) of NFM, the decreased intensity for Fe K-edge and increased intensity of NFM-CZF indicate that electric-dipole-allowed Fe/Mn 1s-4p (t* 1u ) transition would be affected by heteroatom doping. [16] Meanwhile, both the near edge line (II) of Fe and Mn exhibit a blue shift toward the standard average electronic valence state, suggesting the formation of a more optimized local electronic structure. [4b] In addition, the pre-edge peak (III) is mainly originated from the TM 3d (e* g )-O 2p orbital, showing a slight decrease in intensity with Ca/Zr/F incorporation, reflecting mitigated lattice distortion and strengthened centrosymmetry structure. ...

Unveiling the Evolution of LiCoO 2 beyond 4.6 V
  • Citing Article
  • October 2023

ACS Energy Letters

... All of the microstructure, phase components, particle shape, particle size, and specific surface of NaFePO 4 /C cathode materials were resources constrains their application in energy storage systems. Sodium (Na) and lithium (Li) are in the same main group of the periodic table and share similar chemical properties, which suggests that NaFePO 4 can theoretically offer performance comparable to LiFePO 4 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, sodium resources are more abundant, NaFePO 4 cathode material attracts much attention. ...

From Li to Na: Exploratory Analysis of Fe‐Based Phosphates Polyanion‐Type Cathode Materials by Mn Substitution
  • Citing Article
  • August 2023