Jerry T. Mohr’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


AirLand Battle Future: combat engineer force structure.
  • Article

34 Reads

Jerry T. Mohr

Military writers believe that future warfare is about to undergo fundamental change. Due to extremely sophisticated intelligent weapons and the lack of economic resources, countries are moving away from mass conscripted draftee armies toward smaller, highly trained professional armies. In addition to greater battlefield lethality introduced by the new 'brilliant' weapon systems, social forces in the Western world demand that military leaders avoid attrition warfare and conserve the lives of soldiers. The solution to these societal forces is the prosecution of warfare on a nonlinear battlefield. The purpose of this monograph is to examine the US Army's revised operational concept that extensively modifies AirLand Battle. The title of the revised operational concept is AirLand Battle Future. This monograph provides a detailed explanation of the AirLand Battle Future concept and explores the theoretical principles from Sun Tzu and William S. Lind upon which AirLand Battle Future is largely derived. Then the monograph examines and analyzes the supporting engineer doctrine and proposed engineer force structure developed by the Engineer School at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. The analysis reveals that the Engineer School streamlined engineer force structure distributing engineer assets among maneuver forces where they need them on a regular basis. Those engineer assets used infrequently are consolidated at corps level to enable the corps commander to shift engineer assets when needed. In addition, the Engineer School created an engineer force structure that can provide significantly improved mobility support. However, the proposed engineer force structure does not yet provide the mobility support needed by M1A1 Abrams tanks and M2 Bradley fighting vehicles. The Army must alleviate this shortcoming by fielding new generation mobility vehicles (in particular, the combat mobility vehicle (CMV) and the heavy assault bridge (HAB)) that replace the present day combat engineer vehicle (CEV) and the armored vehicle launched bridge (AVLB).