Jerke W. De Vries’s research while affiliated with Wageningen University & Research and other places

Source Segregation (SS) is a novel strategy in dairy housing that can reduce emissions and separate organic matter and nutrients more efficiently than traditional slurry solid-liquid separation. The anaerobic digestion (AD) methane yield of the SS fractions, however, is unknown. We aimed at unveiling the biomethane yield of these fractions by conducting AD experiments under different configurations: batch, continuous feeding, and fed-batch. In the batch test, the solid (SF) and liquid fraction (LF) from the SS system, a slurry collected from the pit (CS), and a self-made slurry (MF) were used as substrates. The results showed that the specific CH4 yields of the SF and MF were in same range and both higher than the CS. We concluded that SS can increase the CH4 yield of dairy excreta mainly by reducing losses in the animal house. The SF and MF were then compared in a continuously-fed thermophilic test, where SF had a higher specific (174 compared to 105 NL kg-1 VS) and volumetric (12.2 compared to 9.9 NL CH4 kg-1 excreta) yields. We concluded that the SF can effectively substitute slurry in AD without compromising the yield, possibly increasing economic viability by reducing transport costs and reactor size. Further, SF produced 356 NL CH4 kg-1 VS and a digestate with 1.8% lower dry matter in the fed-batch as compared to continuous feeding. Continuously stirred fed-batch can thus increase the CH4 yield of the SF and reduce the DM of its digestate potentially contributing to lower emissions in storage and field application.

This chapter discusses optimizing slurry management in agricultural practices. It begins by first highlighting current decision tools for optimizing manure management, then goes on to review modifying animal slurry pH to enhance its value as a biobased fertilizer through methods such as bio acidification and alkalinization. A section on improving manure management systems to minimize trade-offs is also provided, followed by an overview of combining manure management with anaerobic digestion. The chapter also reviews pre- and post-treatment for anaerobic digestion as well as the optimization of anaerobic digestion operations to optimize digestate quality.

Purpose The livestock sector has a major impact on the environment. This environmental impact may be reduced by feeding agricultural co-products (e.g. beet tails) to livestock, as this transforms inedible products for humans into edible products, e.g. pork or beef. Nevertheless, co-products have different applications such as bioenergy production. Based on a framework we developed, we assessed environmental consequences of using co-products in diets of livestock, including the alternative application of that co-product. Methods We performed a consequential life cycle assessment, regarding greenhouse gas emissions (including emissions related to land use change) and land use, for two case studies. Case 1 includes increasing the use of wheat middlings in diets of dairy cattle at the expense of using it in diets of pigs. The decreased use of wheat middlings in diets of pigs was substituted with barley, the marginal product. Case 2 includes increasing the use of beet tails in diets of dairy cattle at the expense of using it to produce bioenergy. During the production of biogas, electricity, heat and digestate (that is used as organic fertilizer) were produced. The decrease of electricity and heat was substituted with fossil fuel, and digestate was substituted with artificial fertilizer. Results and discussion Using wheat middlings in diets of dairy cattle instead of using it in diets of pigs resulted in a reduction of 329 kg CO2 eq per ton wheat middlings and a decrease of 169 m2 land. Using beet tails in diets of dairy cattle instead of using it as a substrate for anaerobic digestion resulted in a decrease of 239 kg CO2 eq per ton beet tails and a decrease of 154 m2 land. Emissions regarding land use change contributed significantly in both cases but had a high uncertainty factor, ±170 ton CO2 ha−1. Excluding emissions from land use change resulted in a decrease of 9 kg CO2 eq for case 1 ‘wheat middlings’ and an increase of 50 kg CO2 eq for case 2 ‘beet tails’. Conclusions Assessing the use of co-products in the livestock sector is of importance because shifting its application can reduce the environmental impact of the livestock sector. A correct assessment of the environmental consequences of using co-products in animal feed should also include potential changes in impacts outside the livestock sector, such as the impact in the bioenergy sector.

Gaseous emissions from in-house storage of liquid animal manure remain a major contributor to the environmental impact of manure management. Our aim was to assess the life cycle environmental consequences and reduction potential of segregating fattening pig urine and feces with an innovative V-belt system and to compare it to conventional liquid manure management, i.e. the reference. Moreover, we aimed at analyzing uncertainty of the outcomes related to applied emission factors. We compared a reference with two scenarios: segregation with solid, aerobically, stored feces and with liquid, anaerobically, stored feces. Results showed that, compared to the reference, segregation reduced climate change (CC) up to 82%, due to lower methane emission, reduced terrestrial acidification (TA) and particulate matter formation (PMF) up to 49%, through lower ammonia emission, but increased marine eutrophication (ME) up to 11% through nitrogen oxide emission from storage and nitrate leaching after field application. Fossil fuel depletion did not change. Segregation with liquid feces revealed lower environmental impact than segregation with solid feces. Uncertainty analysis supported the conclusion that segregating fattening pig urine and feces significantly reduced CC, and additionally, segregation with liquid feces significantly reduced TA and PMF compared to the reference.