Jennifer L. Boynton’s research while affiliated with Fidelity Investments and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Readability of fonts in the windows environment
  • Conference Paper

January 1995

·

94 Reads

·

94 Citations

·

Jennifer L. Boynton

·

The readability of twelve different fonts and sizes in the Microsoft Windows environment was studied. The specific fonts were Arial, MS Sans Serif, MS Serif, and Small Fonts. Their sizes ranged from 6.0 to 9.75 points. These were presented using black text on either a white or gray background and either bold or non-bold style. There were significant differences between the various font/size combinations in terms of reading speed, accuracy, and subjective preferences. There were no consistent differences as a result of background color or boldness. The most preferred fonts were Arial and MS Sans Serif at 9.75. Most of the fonts from 8.25 to 9.75 performed well in terms of reading speed and accuracy, with the exception of MS Serif at 8.25. Arial at 7.5 and both of the Small Fonts (6.0 and 6.75) should generally be avoided.

Citations (1)


... Also using a CRT screen, Tullis et al. (1995) compared the legibility of four typefaces available in the Microsoft (MS) Windows operating environment: two serif typefaces, MS Serif and Small Font, and two sans serif typefaces, Arial and MS Sans Serif. Each was used in two, three, or four different sizes, yielding 12 combinations of typeface and size. ...

Reference:

Reading Text in Internet Browsers
Readability of fonts in the windows environment
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • January 1995