Javier C. Angulo’s research while affiliated with Universidad Europea and other places

Urogenital cancer is very common in the male population of Western countries, a problem of major concern for public health systems, and a frequent test subject for oncological research. In this narrative, we identify the main hot topics for clinics and the basic science of urological cancer in the last few years (from 2021 onwards), considering the information given in the abstracts of almost 300 original articles published in outstanding journals of pathology, urology, and basic science. Once defined, for the top ten list of hot topics (the 2022 WHO update on the classification of urinary and male genital tumors, new entities in kidney cancer, urinary cancer-omics, update on the Gleason grading system, targeted therapies and other novel therapies in renal cancer, news on non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma, artificial intelligence in urologic cancer, intratumor heterogeneity influence in therapeutic failures in urologic neoplasms, intratumor microbiome and its influence in urologic tumor aggressiveness, and ecological principles and mathematics applied to urogenital cancer study), each issue is independently reviewed in an attempt to put together the most relevant updates and/or useful features accompanied by selected illustrations. This review article addresses some of the most interesting and current hot spots in urogenital basic cancer research and clinics and is mainly aimed toward clinicians, including pathologists, urologists, and oncologists. Readers are invited to explore each topic for further, more detailed information, in addition to the references provided.

Despite advances in the management of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), robust biomarkers for prognosis and therapeutic response prediction remain elusive. Dysregulation of the intrarenal renin–angiotensin system (RAS) has been implicated in renal carcinogenesis but little explored, particularly regarding biomarker discovery and therapeutic innovation. Consequently, this study investigates the immunohistochemical expression and clinical relevance of the Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor D (MrgD) in patients with ccRCC who developed metastatic disease (mccRCC). A cohort of 132 patients treated between 2008 and 2018 with nephrectomy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based sequential therapy was analyzed. Treatment response was assessed using both the MASS and RECIST scoring systems. High MrgD expression in primary tumors was significantly associated with larger size, advanced stage, higher histological grade, and worse overall survival. Among 81 patients with metachronous metastases, high MrgD expression independently predicted shorter disease-free survival. High MrgD staining intensity correlated with poorer TKI responses in first-line therapy but improved outcomes with second-line mTORC1 inhibitors. These findings suggest that MrgD may be a useful biomarker of RAS linked to tumor aggressiveness in ccRCC. MrgD holds potential for identifying high-risk patients and guiding treatment selection in advanced disease. Further research is needed to unlock its clinical potential.

Urological cancer is very common in the male population of Western countries, a problem of major concern for public health systems, and a frequent test bench for oncological research. In this narrative we identify the main hot topics on clinics and basic science of urological cancer in the last few years (from 2021 onwards) considering the information given in the abstracts of almost 300 original articles published in outstanding journals of Pathology, Urology, and Basic Science. Once defined the top-ten list of hot topics (2022 WHO update in the classification of urinary and male genital tumors, new entities in kidney cancer, urinary cancer -omics, update on Gleason grading system, targeted therapies and other novel therapies in renal cancer, news on non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma, artificial intelligence in urologic cancer, intratumor heterogeneity influence in therapeutic failures in urologic neoplasms, intratumor microbiome and its influence in urologic tumor aggressiveness, and ecological principles and mathematics applied to urological cancer study), each issue is independently overviewed trying to put together in a succinct manner the most relevant updates and/or useful features accompanied by selected illustrations. This review article goes through some of the most interesting and current hot spots in urological basic cancer research and clinics, and is mainly oriented for clinicians, including pathologists, urologists, and oncologists. Readers are invited to deep into every topic for further, more detailed, information, with the references provided.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most challenging neoplasms because of its phenotypic variability and intratumoral heterogeneity. Because of its variability, ccRCC is a good test bench for the application of new technological approaches to unveiling its intricacies. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) is an emerging method that enables the simultaneous and detailed assessment of tumor and stromal cell subpopulations in a single tissue section. This novel approach represents a promising step forward for analyzing the microenvironmental cell composition and distribution across the tumor and understanding its possible interactions with tumor cells. This study provides the first characterization of the spatial distribution of fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP)-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts (FAP + CAFs) in conjunction with lymphoid (CD4 + , CD8 + , CD4 + FOXP3 + , and CD20 +) and myeloid (CD68 +) cells in tissue sections from ccRCC in their early phases of evolution (n = 88). Both the tumor center and periphery were analyzed with mIF. FAP + CAFs and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were significantly concentrated at the tumor periphery. Additionally, elevated percentages of FAP + CAFs were correlated with larger tumors and synchronous metastases. Increased levels of CD68 + and CD4 + FOXP3 + cells (above the 75th percentile) were linked to worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with ccRCC. Furthermore, significant correlations emerged among FAP + CAFs, TILs, and CD68 + cells, and the co-occurrence of elevated FAP + CAFs, T-cytotoxic (CD8 +), T-regulatory (CD4 + FOXP3 +) cells, and macrophages (CD68 +) at the tumor center were independently associated with worse CSS. These findings suggest that FAP + CAFs contribute to the aggressiveness of ccRCC, and their role is potentially mediated by their ability to foster an immunosuppressive environment within the renal tumor microenvironment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are improving the response rates of advanced renal cancer patients. However, many treated patients do not respond, making novel immune checkpoint-based immunotherapies potentially clinically beneficial only for specific groups of patients. We detected high expression of the immune checkpoint protein B7-H3 in clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) and evaluated B7-H3 immunohistochemistry staining in tissue microarray samples from two distinct renal cancer cohorts. B7-H3 was highly expressed in approximately 50% of primary tumors and in 30% of metastatic lesions. B7-H3 expression in primary tumors correlated with tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid transformation, disease-free survival, and synchronous metastasis, while B7-H3 expression in metastasis correlated with metastases to the lymph nodes. Gene expression analysis revealed the association of B7-H3 expression with gene expression scores involved in T cell exhaustion and myeloid immune evasion, as well as with PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT pathways. Furthermore, knocking down B7-H3 expression in renal cancer cells by siRNA and CRISPR/Cas resulted in lower 2D and 3D cell proliferation and viability as well as increased sensitivity to TKI axitinib. Together, our findings suggest a pro-oncogenic and immune evasive role for B7-H3 in ccRCC and highlight B7-H3 as an actionable novel immune checkpoint protein in combination with TKI in advanced renal cancer.

Background: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is an infrequent but dreadful complication and constitutes a therapeutic challenge. The efficacy and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS®) in these patients is rather unknown, mainly due to the rarity of this condition. We aimed to assess the results of ATOMS to treat SUI after transurethral resection (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) of the prostate. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients with SUI after TURP or HoLEP for BPE primarily treated with silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP) ATOMS implants in ten different institutions in Europe and Canada between 2018 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were pure SUI for >1 year after endoscopic treatment for BPE and informed consent to receive an ATOMS. The primary endpoint of the study was a dry rate (pad test ≤ 20 mL/day after adjustment). The secondary endpoints were: the total continence rate (no pads and no leakage), complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification) and self-perceived satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale 1 to 3). Descriptive analytics, Wilcoxon’s rank sum test and Fisher’s exact test were performed. Results: A total of 40 consecutive patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 23 following TURP and 17 HoLEP. After ATOMS adjustment, 32 (80%) patients were dry (78.3% TURP and 82.4% HoLEP; p = 1) and total continence was achieved in 18 (45%) patients (43.5% TURP and 47% HoLEP; p = 0.82). The median pad test was at a 500 (IQR 300) mL baseline (648 (IQR 650) TURP and 500 (IQR 340) HoLEP; p = 0.62) and 20 (IQR 89) mL (40 (IQR 90) RTUP and 10 (IQR 89) HoLEP; p = 0.56) after adjustment. Satisfaction (PGI-I ≤ 3) was reported in 37 (92.5%) patients (95.6% TURP and 88.2% HoLEP; p = 0.5). There were no significant differences between patients treated with TURP or HoLEP regarding the patient age, radiotherapy and number of adjustments needed. After 32.5 (IQR 30.5) months, median follow-up postoperative complications occurred in seven (17.5%) cases (two grade I and five grade II; three after TURP and four HoLEP) and two devices were removed (5%, both HoLEP). Conclusions: ATOMS is an efficacious and safe alternative to treat SUI due to sphincteric damage produced by endoscopic surgery for BPE, both TURP and HoLEP. Future studies with a larger number of patients may identify predictive factors that would allow better patient selection for ATOMS in this scenario.

Simple Summary Despite the continuous therapeutic efforts metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a dreadful disease, but the many options available provide an horizon of hope for these patients. Sequential therapy based on vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) continues in use. We present a nomogram for a more individualized and accurate estimation of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with clear-cell (CC) mRCC treated with nephrectomy and VEGFR-TK, based on four independent clinical predictors: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status; International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score; Morphology, Attenuation, Size and Structure (MASS) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response criteria. This tool may be useful to clinicians assessing risk and prognosis of patients with mRCC. Abstract (1) Objective: To develop a clinically useful nomogram that may provide a more individualized and accurate estimation of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with clear-cell (CC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI)-based sequential therapy. (2) Methods: A prospectively maintained database of 145 patients with mRCC treated between 2008 and 2018 was analyzed to predict the CSS of patients receiving sunitinib and second- and third-line therapies according to current standards of practice. A nomogram based on four independent clinical predictors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score, the Morphology, Attenuation, Size and Structure criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response criteria) was calculated. The corresponding 1- to 10-year CSS probabilities were then determined from the nomogram. (3) Results: The median age was 60 years (95% CI 57.9–61.4). The disease was metastatic at diagnosis in 59 (40.7%), and 86 (59.3%) developed metastasis during follow-up. Patients were followed for a median 48 (IQR 72; 95% CI 56–75.7) months after first-line VEGFR-TKI initiation. The concordance probability estimator value for the nomogram is 0.778 ± 0.02 (mean ± SE). (4) Conclusions: A nomogram to predict CSS in patients with CC mRCC that incorporates patient status, clinical risk classification and response criteria to first-line VEGFR-TKI at 3 months is presented. This new tool may be useful to clinicians assessing the risk and prognosis of patients with mRCC.

(1) Objective: To develop a clinically useful nomogram that may provide a more individualized and accurate estimation of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with clear-cell (CC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and tyrosine kinase Inhibitor (TKI) based sequential therapy; (2) Methods: A prospectively maintained database of 145 patients with mRCC treated between 2008-2018 was analyzed to predict CSS of patients receiving sunitinib and 2nd and 3rd line therapies according to current standards of practice. A nomogram taking into account four independent clinical predictors (ECOG status, IMDC score, MASS and RECIST response criteria) was calculated. The corresponding 1- to 10-year CSS probabilities were then determined from the nomogram; (3) Results: The median age was 60 years (95% CI 57.9-61.4). Disease was metastatic at diagnosis in 59 (40.7%) and 86 (59.3%) developed metachronous metastasis after nephrectomy. Patients were followed for a median 48 (IQR 72; 95% CI 56-75.7) months after first-line TKI initiation. Concordance probability estimator for the nomogram is 0.778 ± 0.02 (mean ± SE); (4) Conclusions: A nomogram to predict CSS in patients with CC mRCC that incorporates patient status, clinical risk classification and response criteria to first-line TKI at 3 months is presented. This new tool may be useful to clinicians assessing risk and prognosis of patients with mRCC.

Sunitinib has greatly improved the survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients in recent years. However, 20–30% of treated patients do not respond. To identify miRNAs and genes associated with a response, comparisons were made between biopsies from responder and non-responder ccRCC patients. Using integrated transcriptomic analyses, we identified 37 miRNAs and 60 respective target genes, which were significantly associated with the NF-kappa B, PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways. We validated expression of the miRNAs (miR-223, miR-155, miR-200b, miR-130b) and target genes (FLT1, PRDM1 and SAV1) in 35 ccRCC patients. High levels of miR-223 and low levels of FLT1, SAV1 and PRDM1 were associated with worse overall survival (OS), and combined miR-223 + SAV1 levels distinguished responders from non-responders (AUC = 0.92). Using immunohistochemical staining of 170 ccRCC patients, VEGFR1 (FLT1) expression was associated with treatment response, histological grade and RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) score, whereas SAV1 and BLIMP1 (PRDM1) were associated with metachronous metastatic disease. Using in situ hybridisation (ISH) to detect miR-155 we observed higher tumoural cell expression in non-responders, and non-tumoural cell expression with increased histological grade. In summary, our preliminary analysis using integrated miRNA-target gene analyses identified several novel biomarkers in ccRCC patients that surely warrant further investigation.

Unfortunately, prostate cancer treatment is not free of complications.