December 2024
·
31 Reads
Magyar Geofizika
An advantage of acoustic emission (AE) monitoring is that it can be used to capture pre-peak, peak, and post-peak stress changes in the rock mass. It provides useful information for characterizing rock mass behaviour at all stages of fracturing, even prior to measurable deformation. Based on the fact that AE activity is closely related to stress change in the rock mass and the stress level for AE initiation is associated with the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock mass, one can utilize this understanding of brittle failure to determine the relative stress state in the rock mass. An objective function is derived from the consideration of stress in the rock mass and rock mass strength using the generalized AE initiation threshold. Th e seismo-acoustic sensors used in the Bátaapáti National Radioactive Waste Repository (NRWR) contains an acceleration sensor of type PI-A-3-1, which is a self-developed system by Hungarian specialists (Geopolita Ltd.), enabling acceleration measurement. High-bandwidth, high-sensitivity piezoelectric acceleration sensor signals are received by lownoise preamplifi ers. Aft er amplifi cation and fi ltering, the X, Y, Z direction acceleration signals are received by a three-channel analog summing-converter. Th e summed signals are sent to the central unit via a shielded cable aft er the undercut fi lter. Th is paper is presenting the theoretical background of AE measurements used in Bátaapáti NRWR and a detailed backanalysis study on the measured database which provides the description of the stress-strain behaviour of rock mass and the prediction of the short- and long-term rock mass strength. Most back-analysis in geotechnical engineering is based on methods that utilize fi eld displacement monitoring data. In this paper, the investigation of the rock mass strength is examined using a novel method which was developed to backcalculate rock mass strength parameters from acoustic emission (AE) monitoring data in combination with fi nite element method (FEM) and boundary element method (BEM) stress analysis. Th e rock mass strength parameters identifi ed from this approach compare well with the strength data predicted from the geotechnical fi eld mapping and fi eld test data, suggesting that the procedure can be used eff ectively to back-calculate rock mass strength parameters from AE monitoring data. Displacement measurements like extensometers and convergence meters are routinely conducted in situ measured movements. Displacement is one of the reliably measurable quantities in the fi eld. Since deformations are also event-sequence and/or time-dependent and they are the most readily available fi eld measurement for any kind of calibration, they can be used to back-analyze specifi c or abnormal deformation events. However, large abnormal deformations are usually associated with the failure of the rock mass in the post-peak region. Oft en, deformation control measures around the residual strength level are not necessarily eff ective in preventing large, abnormal deformations, so the use of AE monitoring is crucial.