Jan Petr’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Figure 1: Wreaths generated by the permutation (10 5 3 9 1 6 2 7 4 8) of Z 10 where, from left to right, k is taken to be 3, 2 and 4.
The wreath matrix
  • Preprint
  • File available

January 2025

·

2 Reads

Jan Petr

·

Pavel Turek

Let knk\leq n be positive integers and Zn\mathbb{Z}_{n} be the set of integers modulo n. A conjecture of Baranyai from 1974 asks for a decomposition of k-element subsets of Zn\mathbb{Z}_{n} into particular families of sets called "wreaths". We approach this conjecture from a new algebraic angle by introducing the key object of this paper, the wreath matrix M. As our first result, we establish that Baranyai's conjecture is equivalent to the existence of a particular vector in the kernel of M. We then employ results from representation theory to study M and its spectrum in detail. In particular, we find all eigenvalues of M and their multiplicities, and identify several families of vectors which lie in the kernel of M.

Download

Figure 1: Examples of permutations which confirm Conjectures 2.2 and 2.4 for k ≤ 3. Below each Dyck k-path the corresponding permutation π is written in the form π(0), . . . , π(2k). The second conditions of the conjectures require numbers 1, . . . , k to lie below rises and numbers k + 1, . . . , 2k below falls.
Figure 2: The bijection from Lemma 3.1 given by 'flipping' the section of the path after the highlighted point.
Figure 3: An illustration of NE upper paths whose interval of length m starting at (i, i + d) contains exactly l East steps.
Figure 4: An illustration of the left-hand side of equation (1). Next, we claim that the pairs (W, i) are in bijection with NE upper paths from (l−k−1, d+m−l−k) to (0, d) which visit the diagonal y = x in at least one point. The bijection is given as follows. Given a pair (W, i), consider the sequence of k + l − m North and k − l East steps corresponding to W . After the step at which W reaches (−i, −i), add an additional East step. Denote by W ′ the path corresponding to the longer sequence of North and East steps starting at (l −k −1, d+m−l −k). Observe that W ′ consists of k + l − m North steps and k − l + 1 East steps, never visits a point below the diagonal y = x but visits a point on this diagonal. Moreover, the first visited point on this diagonal is (−i, −i). On the other hand, let W ′ be a path from (l − k − 1, d + m − l − k) to (0, d) consisting of North and East steps that never goes below the diagonal y = x but which visits this diagonal in at least one point. Then there is a first point at which W ′ visits this diagonal; let this point be (−i, −i). Consider the sequence of k + l − m North and k − l + 1 East steps corresponding to W ′ . Remove the East step that leads to (−i, −i) to obtain a shorter sequence of steps, and denote by W the corresponding path starting at (l − k, d + m − l − k). Then (W, i) is a pair where i ∈ [k + l − m − d] and W is a NE upper path from (l − k, d + m − l − k) to (0, d) which goes through the point (−i, −i). The maps from the previous two paragraphs are inverses to each other, and hence describe the desired bijection, see Figure 5 for an illustration. We thus obtain that the left-hand side of equation (1) counts the number of NE upper paths from (l − k − 1, d + m − l − k) to (0, d) which visit the diagonal y = x in at least one point. Note that such paths are exactly the NE upper paths from (l − k − 1, d + m − l − k) to (0, d) which visit a point below the diagonal y = x + 1. The number of such paths is P
Figure 5: The bijection from Claim 1. The additional step in W ′ is the East step leading to (−i, i).
Intervals in Dyck paths and the wreath conjecture

January 2025

·

1 Read

Let ιk(m,l)\iota_{k}(m,l) denote the total number of intervals of length m across all Dyck paths of semilength k such that each interval contains precisely l falls. We give the formula for ιk(m,l)\iota_{k}(m,l) and show that ιk(k,l)=(kl)2\iota_{k}(k,l)=\binom{k}{l}^2. Motivated by this, we propose two stronger variants of the wreath conjecture due to Baranyai for n=2k+1.


Towards odd-sunflowers: temperate families and lightnings

June 2024

·

1 Read

Motivated by odd-sunflowers, introduced recently by Frankl, Pach, and P{\'a}lv{\"o}lgyi, we initiate the study of temperate families: a family FP([n])\mathcal{F} \subseteq \mathcal{P}([n]) is said to be \emph{temperate} if each AFA \in \mathcal{F} contains at most A|A| elements of F\mathcal{F} as a proper subset. We show that the maximum size of a temperate family is attained by the middle two layers of the hypercube {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n. As a more general result, we obtain that the middle t+1 layers of the hypercube maximise the size of a family F\mathcal{F} such that each AFA \in \mathcal{F} contains at most j=1t(Aj)\sum_{j=1}^t \binom{|A|}{j} elements of F\mathcal{F} as a proper subset. Moreover, we classify all such families consisting of the maximum number of sets. In the case of intersecting temperate families, we find the maximum size and classify all intersecting temperate families consisting of the maximum number of sets for odd n. We also conjecture the maximum size for even n.