James Lewis’s research while affiliated with University of Pennsylvania and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. Flowchart of popular currently available methods and their best use cases. Selection criteria are shown in yellow boxes and methods in green.
Figure 2. INducE remission in Crohn's Disease (DINE-CD) study design diagram. © 2024, BioRender Inc. Figure 2 was created using BioRender, and is published under a CC BY-NC-ND license. Further reproductions must adhere to the terms of this license.
Figure 3. Comparison of Mantel test p-values using original and log-transformed metabolite concentrations at baseline and 6 weeks. Gray dashed lines denote nominal significance at the 0.05 level and the red dashed line is the y = x line. All tests are significant using the log-transformed data. There are large differences in p-values between the two scales, particularly at baseline.
Statistical and computational methods for integrating microbiome, host genomics, and metabolomics data
  • Literature Review
  • Full-text available

June 2024

·

63 Reads

eLife

Rebecca A Deek

·

Siyuan Ma

·

James Lewis

·

Hongzhe Li

Large-scale microbiome studies are progressively utilizing multiomics designs, which include the collection of microbiome samples together with host genomics and metabolomics data. Despite the increasing number of data sources, there remains a bottleneck in understanding the relationships between different data modalities due to the limited number of statistical and computational methods for analyzing such data. Furthermore, little is known about the portability of general methods to the metagenomic setting and few specialized techniques have been developed. In this review, we summarize and implement some of the commonly used methods. We apply these methods to real data sets where shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics data are available for microbiome multiomics data integration analysis. We compare results across methods, highlight strengths and limitations of each, and discuss areas where statistical and computational innovation is needed.

Download