James H. May’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Geotechnical Aspects of Rock Erosion in Emergency Spillway Channels. Report 5 Summary of Results, Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Article

September 1990

·

9 Reads

Christopher P. Cameron

·

David M. Patrick

·

James H. May

·

[...]

·

Colin C. McAneny

Severe erosion of rock and soils flooring unlined emergency spillway channels may cause failure of spillway structures and catastrophic release of reservoirs waters. An observational data base was used to document cases of spillway erosion using data from site visits, periodic inspection reports, and videos of spillway flow. It was shown the data base showed that severe erosion occurred at discharges which were 10% of Project Maximum Floods (PMF), and at velocities which were greater than those currently recommended. Spillway channel erosion was driven by processes similar to knickpoint migration (headcutting) in natural stream channels. Stratigraphic and structural discontinuities in the spillway foundation were important factors in controlling the occurrence and extent of erosion. Flume studies showed that erosion and headcutting were maximized when waterfall became unvented. Model studies and computer simulations showed that erosion did not accompany peak discharge but occurred on the lower portions of rising and falling limbs of the hydrograph. Therefore, severe erosion may occur at discharges significantly lower than PMF or spillway design flood. Spillway channels that are susceptible to erosion require detailed engineering geologic maps and cross sections of rock distribution and rock mass properties. (mm)


Geotechnical aspects of rock erosion in emergency spillway channels

September 1988

·

9 Reads

·

8 Citations

REMR research at the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station has established that remediation of unlined emergency spillway erosion damage is a relatively new, but major, concern to the US Army Corps of Engineers (CE) Districts and to other dam owners and operators. The REMR work unit conducting the current investigation has identified numerous CE and other Federal, institutional, and private-sector dams that have experienced erosion damage in their unlined spillway channels. However, only a few projects have implemented or planned remedial and/or preventive measures. Remediation design is highly site-specific and must be cost-effective, address public safety, and provide continued reservoir operations. Selection of remedial technique(s) must be established by site-specific characterization of the rocks forming an unlined spillway channel in terms of rock composition(s), hardness, structural and stratigraphic discontinuities, and precursor erosion elements, all of which determine rock erodibility and its rate.


Geotechnical Aspects of Rock Erosion in Emergency Spillway Channels Supplemental Information on Prediction, Control, and Repair of Erosion in Emergency Spillway Channels
  • Article
  • Full-text available

89 Reads

·

1 Citation

Download

Citations (3)


... The rock mass resistive capacity is governed by the material parameters and the joint characteristics such as joint spacing, joint orientation, shape and volume of the block, joint filling, block protrusion and toughness of the block (Annandale, 2012;Boumaiza et al., 2019;Pells, 2016). Cameron et al. (1986Cameron et al. ( , 1990) have presented various geological aspects of the rock mass that affect the erosion process and highlighted the headward migration of knickpoint with the erosion towards the spillway crest. Pitsiou (1990) have explained the importance of various parameters of the rock mass discontinuities on the hydraulic erosion process and the importance of a classification of the geological data into different categories based on the spillway type. ...

Reference:

Effect of Joint Orientation on Rock Mass Erosion Based on Experimental Results Using a Pilot Plant Spillway Model
Geotechnical aspects of rock erosion in emergency spillway channels
  • Citing Article
  • September 1988

... The US Army Corp of Engineers (1990) do not recommend inspection for erosion of concrete in cavitating flows when U b < c. 10 m s À1 and anticipate significant erosion of spillways only when U b > 30-35 m s À1 is sustained for long periods of time (Novak et al., 2007). As many substrata, especially sedimentary rocks, are softer than concrete, it is logical to expect cavitation erosion of softer rocks in high velocity flows; for example, at the base of spillways where large rock masses can be removed by high discharges (Ribeiro et al., 1976;Cameron et al., 1986;Falvey, 1990;Anton et al., 2015). Barnes (1956) concluded that stream flow must exceed 7.6 m s À1 for cavitation to be possible, whilst Baker and Costa (1987) argued that flows need to exceed 10 m s À1 . ...

GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF ROCK EROSION (0 IN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CHANNELS

... Temple and Hanson (1994) [35] stated that formation and migration of headcut are also part of the erosion process in vegetated earth (soil and rock) auxiliary or emergency spillways. Mathewson, et al. (1998) [36] concluded from post-flow field inspections of eroded spillway channels that once erosion was initiated at some geometric anomaly, the primary erosion mechanism was either boundary shear or headcutting. ...

Geotechnical Aspects of Rock Erosion in Emergency Spillway Channels Supplemental Information on Prediction, Control, and Repair of Erosion in Emergency Spillway Channels