J. L. Austin's research while affiliated with Cambridge and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
Citations
... Public argumentation would be impossible were it not for linguistic norms that allow speakers to express and mutually understand their thoughts and intentions. Competent users of a natural language can be thought to share syntactic and semantic rules determining what a well-formed, meaning-imbued utterance is (Chomsky 1965;Katz & Fodor 1964), as well as pragmatic rules enabling them to coordinate on non-literal meanings given how an utterance functions in context (Alston 2000;Austin 1962;Green 2009;Grice 1989;Sbisà, 2019;Searle 1969;Williamson 2000). As rules that provide evaluative criteria for all communicative practices, these linguistic norms are directly relevant to how the ideals of correctness and participation inform and shape communicative practices. ...
