J. A. Galbraith’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data
  • Article

June 2008

·

284 Reads

·

447 Citations

David J. Bartholomew

·

·

J. A. Galbraith

·

Drawing on the authors’ varied experiences working and teaching in the field, Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data, Second Editionenables a basic understanding of how to use key multivariate methods in the social sciences. With updates in every chapter, this edition expands its topics to include regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation models, and multilevel models. After emphasizing the summarization of data in the first several chapters, the authors focus on regression analysis. This chapter provides a link between the two halves of the book, signaling the move from descriptive to inferential methods and from interdependence to dependence. The remainder of the text deals with model-based methods that primarily make inferences about processes that generate data. Relying heavily on numerical examples, the authors provide insight into the purpose and working of the methods as well as the interpretation of data. Many of the same examples are used throughout to illustrate connections between the methods. In most chapters, the authors present suggestions for further work that go beyond conventional exercises, encouraging readers to explore new ground in social science research. Requiring minimal mathematical and statistical knowledge, this book shows how various multivariate methods reveal different aspects of data and thus help answer substantive research questions.

Citations (1)


... As was shown in Table 1, the dataset contained 404 participants providing complete responses to all 10 DLS items. Therefore, the dataset led to a high participant-item ratio of about 40:1, satisfying the criterion that the sample size should be at least six times the number of items for stable results in factor analysis of which Rasch analysis is a special type for categorical data (Bartholomew et al., 2008;Mundfrom et al., 2005;Skrondal & Rabe-Hesketh, 2004). ...

Reference:

Turkish adaptation of the digital literacy scale: A rasch analysis
Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data
  • Citing Article
  • June 2008