Irina Overeem’s research while affiliated with University of Colorado Boulder and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (135)


Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR) watershed and study area. (a) EBR watershed in its regional context, spanning southern Colorado through central New Mexico. (b) EBR watershed, divided into the sediment‐contributing (brown) and dammed (gray) portions of the drainage area (DA). Major dams are labeled and marked by purple squares and their basins are individually outlined in gray. Referenced USGS gages are labeled and marked by blue triangles. Rivers are labeled and outlined in blue (NWS, 1999). Perimeters of fires >1 km² that occurred between 2015 and September 2022 within the sediment‐contributing DA are shown in red with their dates labeled as M/YY (NIFC, 2023). (c) Bathymetry map of EBR from the 2017/2019 reservoir survey (Randle & Benoit, 2019) overlain on imagery from 23 September 2022. (d) EBR delta study area, showing repeat river sampling sites (circles), delta floodplain stations (diamonds), and reservoir sampling sites (triangles). Gray triangles indicate two water samples were collected (at the top and bottom of the water column); white triangles indicate only one water sample was collected. Multi‐colored lines represent the shoreline position during each field trip (labeled M/YY). (e) Delta floodplain stations, installed on 21 March 2022. Opaque diamonds represent recovered sites, and hollow diamonds represent unrecovered sites. (f) Delta floodplain stations, recovered on 17 September 2022, illustrating river migration. Satellite images in (c)–(f) are PlanetScope OrthoTiles from Planet Labs.
Historical data: Rio Grande water and sediment fluxes, and Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR) water level and water storage capacity change through time. (a) Mean daily water discharge for multi‐year average historic records and individual years, Rio Grande at San Marcial, NM (USGS 08358400, code 00060; USGS, 2023a). The discharge record representative of a wet cycle (1979–1995) is shown as a gray dash‐dotted line and shaded in gray, and a dry cycle (1996–2022) as a red dashed line shaded in red (Holste, 2013). Mean daily discharge for the studied drought years 2020, 2021, and 2022 are shown in various shades of blue. (b) EBR water level (left axis) (TWDB, 2023) and incoming sediment discharge, San Marcial (right axis) (code 80155; USGS, 2023a) over a drought decade (2013–2022), with the field study period shaded in gray. (c) EBR water level (left axis) and reservoir water storage capacity (right axis) (Randle & Benoit, 2019), 1916–2022. The gray shaded area corresponds with the time period shown in (b), illustrating that water levels in the past decade (b) were lower than the historical average of 1,324.9 m.
Field measurements from the Rio Grande and Alamosa Creek upstream of Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR) plotted with water discharge at the Narrows (USGS 08359500, code 00060; USGS, 2023b) over the study period (July 2021–September 2022). (a) Water discharge and SSC results (SSC‐EBR) from the Rio Grande upstream of EBR, SSC results from Alamosa Creek (SSC‐AC), and SSC collected by the USGS at San Marcial (SSC‐USGS‐SM) (USGS 08358400, code 80154; USGS, 2023a). (b) Same data as in (a), clipped to the July 2021 flash flood. (c) Water discharge and TOC% of river water samples collected from the Rio Grande upstream of EBR (TOC‐EBR) and from Alamosa Creek (TOC‐AC). (d) Same data as in (c), clipped to the July 2021 flash flood. (e) Water discharge and TOCC (mg/l) of river water samples collected from the Rio Grande upstream of EBR (TOCC‐EBR) and Alamosa Creek (TOCC‐AC). (f) Same data as in (e), clipped to the July 2021 flash flood. In (b), (d), and (f), shapes are colored by sampling location. “AC‐Up” and “AC‐Down” represent samples collected in the Rio Grande above and below its confluence with Alamosa Creek. (g) Grain size D10, D50, and D90 averaged over all Rio Grande water suspended sediment (SS) and bed material (BM) samples for each field campaign. Horizontal lines mark the size class maximum for sand (…), silt (‐.‐), and clay (‐‐). Stars indicate the presence of gravel armor, in which case sand below the gravel layer was sampled.
Changes within the active delta lobe between field campaigns: July 2021 flash flood (a)–(d) and March 2022 low flow (e)–(h). (a) Overview photo of the Rio Grande delta, showing three active distributary channels (D1, D2, and D3). (b) Flow through D1. (c) Overbank flow from D2 into the adjacent floodplain. (d) Dying fish, observed across the delta. (e) Overview photo of the Rio Grande delta, with D1 and D2 disconnected from the main stem. (f) Coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) infilling D1's bed. (g) Sand covering D2's bed. (h) Delta floodplain (FPT) station setup with a temperature sensor and ceramic tile. Arrows indicate flow direction, with black arrows representing active flow and white arrows representing formerly active flow. Photos from the May and September 2022 trips are provided in Figure S7 in Supporting Information S1.
Shallow stratigraphy at (a) FPT1‐1, (b) FPT1‐3, and (c) FPT2‐2. “#” refers to layer number. Missing OC% values indicate layer was not physically sampled. An extended version of the figure shows photos of the excavated pits and the tiles upon station recovery (Figure S8 in Supporting Information S1).

+3

Accelerated Organic Carbon Burial Rates Reconstructed in Elephant Butte Reservoir, New Mexico During a Megadrought
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2025

·

42 Reads

A. C. Eckland

·

I. Overeem

·

B. Carlson

·

Artificial lakes (reservoirs) accumulate sediment and organic carbon (OC) over time. We investigated sedimentation processes in a dryland reservoir and informed OC burial and potential preservation. Our study site, Elephant Butte Reservoir on the Rio Grande, New Mexico, USA receives inflows from sediment‐laden, monsoon‐driven flash floods. Using field data, historical reservoir sedimentation survey and river flux (water, sediment, and OC) data, we estimated sedimentation and carbon burial volumes and rates within the delta, reservoir bottom, and whole reservoir during wet (1980–1988) and dry (2007–2017/2019) climate periods. During severe drought (2021–2022), we measured suspended sediment and OC concentrations for characteristic (seasonal) phases of the river hydrograph, monitored delta sedimentation patterns, and observed river outflow plume dynamics. Measured suspended sediment concentrations (mean = 8,818 mg/l, median = 1,769 mg/l) frequently surpassed the hyperpycnal plume threshold (1,000 mg/l), especially during flash floods (maximum = 46,718 mg/l). River total OC content averaged 5.2% ± 12.2%, increasing to 6.3% ± 10.3% in the summer. Whole reservoir linear sedimentation averaged 3.1 ± 1.4% (dry)–4.0 ± 4.2% (wet) cm/yr, with higher rates on the reservoir bottom (5.0 ± 0.3% cm/yr) than the delta (0.8 ± 1.1% cm/yr) during drought from hyperpycnal plume deposition, potentially preserving OC. Comparisons of OC content in suspension and deposited OC in the delta indicate partial OC preservation. Estimated whole reservoir OC burial is higher during dry than wet conditions (391 ± 43.6% vs. 82.4 ± 56.4% g C/m²yr), suggesting that dryland reservoirs may be efficient carbon sinks during these periods.

Download


Fig. 1. Spatial variations of SSY, vegetation cover, and precipitation in HMA.
(A) Spatial variation in contemporary mean annual SSY in the five subregions: Qi Lian (QL; 11 river basins), Eastern Tibetan Plateau (ETP; 44 river basins), Himalaya–Karakoram–Hindu Kush (HKH; 40 river basins), Kun Lun–Pamir (KLP; 16 river basins), and Tien Shan (TS; 40 river basins). The insert shows the area-weighted mean annual SSYs, glacier cover, mean annual normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and mean annual precipitation from the five subregions, with error bars denoting standard errors. The glacier map is based on the Randolph Glacier Inventory v7.0 (28). (B) Spatial variation in the mean annual NDVI. NDVI is based on the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) NDVI product (73). (C) Spatial variation of mean annual precipitation. Precipitation is based on the ERA-5 reanalysis product (74). See tables S1 and S2 for details of the 151 selected quasi-undisturbed headwater river basins and the five subregions. mm/yr, millimeters per year; t/km2/yr, tons per square kilometer per year.
Fig. 2. SSY as a function of percentage glacier cover.
(A) Variations in mean annual SSYs for glacier-free basins (glacier cover < 0.1%; 30 basins), low–glacier cover basins (0.1% < glacier cover < 10%; 81 basins), moderate–glacier cover basins (10% < glacier cover < 20%; 33 basins), and high–glacier cover basins (glacier cover > 20%; 7 basins). IQR, interquartile range. (B) Mean annual SSY as a function of percentage glacier cover in HMA (y = 87.5x0.98, r2 = 0.62, P < 0.01). (C) The dependence of mean annual SSY on percentage glacier cover in the world’s cold regions. The correlation includes data from all the five cold regions (y = 190x0.43, r2 = 0.34, P < 0.01). See table S3 for the detailed SSYs in other cold regions. The gray-shaded areas denote the 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3. The observed relationship between SSY and mean annual precipitation conditioned by glacier cover (circle sizes).
The inset indicates that, in high–glacier cover basins (glacier cover > 20%; symbols marked with +), the SSYs increase with mean annual precipitation. Subregion labels correspond to those identified in Figs. 1 and 2. Error bars denote SD.
Fig. 4. The observed relationship between SSY and vegetation cover (NDVI) and precipitation.
(A) SSY vegetation exhibits a bidirectional U-shaped pattern, with a negative exponential correlation with vegetation in TS (y = 1633.6e−7.62x, r2 = 0.54, P < 0.01) and a positive exponential correlation with vegetation in ETP (see the inset; y = 20.32e4.60x, r2 = 0.39, P < 0.01). An overall negative exponential correlation between SSYs and vegetation cover is indicated by the data from all the 151 basins (y = 793.36e−3.78x, r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01). Subregion labels correspond to those identified in Figs. 1 and 2. Error bars denote SD. (B) The observed relationship between SSY, NDVI, and mean annual precipitation conditioned by slope (circle sizes) in ETP and TS. A threshold of 0.3 is identified for the positive relationship between SSY and NDVI in ETP (larger SSY corresponds with larger NDVI) and the negative relationship between SSY and NDVI in TS (larger SSY corresponds with smaller NDVI).
Supplementary Fig. S5. Preliminary statistical analysis showing the control of environmental variables on SSY. (A) A preliminary and first-step test for the relationship between SSY and related environmental variables based on the Pearson correlation. The red represents the positive correlation, and the blue represents the negative correlation. G, glacier cover; S, slope; V, vegetation cover; P, mean annual precipitation; A, drainage area; R, relief; T, mean annual temperature; L, lithology erodibility; Q, runoff; F, permafrost cover; Ksn, normalized river channel steepness. Note that there are strong correlations between the environmental factors (e.g., G and S, G and V, G and R, G and T, G and Ksn). To avoid the influences of the confounder factors, partial correlation analysis was also performed (Supplementary Table S5). (B) SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value ranks the relative importance of the 11 main drivers of SSY by the random forest model. The insert figure shows the model performance of overall dataset. (C) the q-statistic analysis for the relationship between SSY and four key environmental factors, namely, glacier cover (G), slope (S), vegetation (V), and precipitation (P). The q-statistic represents the extent to which the environmental proxy (X) can explain the variability of the controlled proxy (Y), as calculated by the Geo-detector software (Methods). The numbers in the inner circle denote the q-statistic between SSY and one single environmental factor, and the numbers in the outer circle denote the q-statistic between SSSY and two interacting environmental factors. Numbers with the symbol * indicate significant correlations (P<0.05).
The competing controls of glaciers, precipitation, and vegetation on high-mountain fluvial sediment yields

November 2024

·

1,495 Reads

·

3 Citations

Science Advances

Investigating erosion and river sediment yield in high-mountain areas is crucial for understanding landscape and biogeochemical responses to environmental change. We compile data on contemporary fluvial suspended sediment yield (SSY) and 12 environmental proxies from 151 rivers in High Mountain Asia surrounding the Tibetan Plateau. We demonstrate that glaciers exert a first-order control on fluvial SSYs, with high precipitation nonlinearly amplifying their role, especially in high–glacier cover basins. We find a bidirectional response to vegetation’s influence on SSY in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau and Tien Shan and identify that the two interacting factors of precipitation and vegetation cover explain 54% of the variability in SSY, reflecting the divergent roles of vegetation in promoting biogenic-weathering versus slope stabilization across bioclimatic zones. The competing interactions between glaciers, ecosystems, and climate in delivering suspended sediment have important implications for predicting carbon and nutrient exports and water quality in response to future climate change.


Modeling Sediment Fluxes From Debris‐Rich Basal Ice Layers

October 2024

·

142 Reads

Sediment erosion, transport, and deposition by glaciers and ice sheets play crucial roles in shaping landscapes, provide important nutrients to downstream ecosystems, and preserve key indicators of past climate conditions in the geologic record. While previous work has quantified sediment fluxes from subglacial meltwater, we also observe sediment entrained within basal ice, transported by the flow of the glacier itself. However, the formation and evolution of these debris‐rich ice layers remains poorly understood and rarely represented in landscape evolution models. Here, we identify a characteristic sequence of basal ice layers at Mendenhall Glacier, Alaska. We develop a numerical model of frozen fringe and regelation processes that describes the co‐evolution of this sequence and explore the sensitivity of the model to key properties of the subglacial sedimentary system, using the Instructed Glacier Model to parameterize ice dynamics. Then, we run numerical simulations over the spatial extent of Mendenhall Glacier, showing that the sediment transport model can predict the observed basal ice stratigraphy at the glacier's terminus. From the model results, we estimate basal ice layers transport between 23,300 m3 m3{\mathrm{m}}^{3} a−1 a1{\mathrm{a}}^{-1} and 39,800 m3 m3{\mathrm{m}}^{3} a−1 a1{\mathrm{a}}^{-1} of sediment, mostly entrained in the lowermost ice layers nearest to the bed, maximized by high effective pressures and slow, convergent flow fields. Overall, our results highlight the role of basal sediment entrainment in delivering eroded material to the glacier terminus and indicate that this process should not be ignored in broader models of landscape evolution.



Figure 1. a) Esri satellite image of the study area in the eastern part of Alaska's North Slope (Esri 2023). The Canning River catchment (white shaded area) extends from the Brooks Range to the Beaufort Sea. Red triangles denote locations of ADCP surveys and suspended sediment sampling activities in 2022 (CR22) and 2023 (CR23). Yellow star shows the location of the historic USGS gauging station at Staines, which was operated June 2008-October 2012 (US Geological Survey 2021). Inset map is a satellite image of Alaska, with the red box showing the study area extent. b) Photo of convective storm clouds and precipitation over the north slope near the Chipp River, AK on 13 June 2013. Photo by J. Koch, USGS. c) Photo of clear water in the Canning River at Staines on 26 July 2023. Photo by M. Repasch, University of Colorado Boulder. d) Photo of turbid water in the Canning River at site CR22-T3 during a thunderstorm-triggered high flow event on 5 July 2022. Inset shows buoyant woody debris and organic matter in surface water collected during this event. Photos by M. Repasch, University of Colorado Boulder.
Figure 2. a) Bar chart showing the response of suspended sediment flux, POC flux, and DOC flux to the 5 July 2022 thunderstorm-triggered high flow event at site T3 (240 m 3 /s) compared with non-storm flow (127 m 3 /s) measured at site T4. b) River discharge (QW) versus instantaneous particulate organic carbon flux (QPOC), dissolved organic carbon flux (QDOC; y-axis left), and suspended sediment flux (QS; y-axis right) at all Canning River locations in 2022. The trendlines represent the power-law relationships between QW and QS, QPOC, and QDOC, expressed by the equations on the plot (Repasch et al. 2024). Downstream at site T3, we observed a second thunderstorm during the night from 4 July to 5 July 2022. This site is ~127 km downstream from the headwaters, at the transition from the foothills to the coastal plain (Figure 1). This thunderstorm caused a significant increase in water level and turbidity (Figure 1d). ADCP measurements show that discharge increased to 240 m 3 /s during this high flow event, representing a 90% increase in water discharge relative to non-storm conditions (127 m 3 /s measured at Staines (site T4) on 7 July 2022; Figure 1c). The suspended sediment concentration increased from ~50 mg/L to ~1800 mg/L, resulting in an increase in suspended sediment flux from ~8 kg/s to ~440 kg/s. The POC concentration increased from ~0.5 mgC/L to ~19 mgC/L, resulting in an increase in POC flux from ~0.05 to 4.5 kgC/s (Figure 2a; Repasch
Figure 3. Continuous record of river water discharge at USGS gauging station 15955000 (Canning River at Staines near Deadhorse, AK) measured from 2009 to 2012 (US Geological Survey 2021). This gauging station was active from June 2008 until September 2012. The red lines indicate 200 m 3 /s river discharge, which was exceeded during the thunderstorm-driven high flow events we observed in the field. The bottom panel shows the long-term daily mean, minimum, and maximum daily discharge over this four-year record.
Impacts of convective storms on runoff, erosion, and carbon export in a continuous permafrost landscape

June 2024

·

204 Reads

·

1 Citation

Permafrost holds more than twice the amount of carbon currently in the atmosphere, but this large carbon reservoir is vulnerable to thaw and erosion under a rapidly changing Arctic climate. Convective storms are becoming increasingly common during Arctic summers and can amplify runoff and erosion. These extreme events, in concert with active layer deepening, may accelerate carbon loss from the Arctic landscape. However, we lack measurements of carbon fluxes during these events. Rivers are sensitive to physical, chemical, and hydrological perturbations, and thus are excellent systems for studying landscape responses to thunderstorms. We present observations from the Canning River, Alaska, which drains the northern Brooks Range and flows across a continuous permafrost landscape to the Beaufort Sea. During summer 2022 and 2023 field campaigns, we opportunistically monitored river discharge, sediment, and organic carbon fluxes during several thunderstorms. During one notable storm, river discharge nearly doubled from ~130 m 3 /s to ~240 m 3 /s, suspended sediment flux increased 70-fold, and the particulate organic carbon (POC) flux increased 90-fold relative to non-storm conditions. Taken together, the river exported ~16 metric tons of POC over one hour of this sustained event, not including the additional flux of woody debris. Furthermore, the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) flux nearly doubled. Although these thunderstorm-driven fluxes are short-lived (hours to days), they play an outsized role in exporting organic carbon from Arctic rivers. Understanding how these extreme events impact river water, sediment, and carbon dynamics will help predict how Arctic climate change will modify the global carbon cycle.


Figure 1. The Canning River in northern Alaska illustrates the heterogeneity in carbon stocks and surface age across an active river corridor in contrast with the surrounding tundra. The river corridor between the dashed yellow lines spans a shifting mosaic of vegetation communities in different stages of growth and whose carbon stock has been augmented and/or depleted by fluvial processes. The example here includes gravel bars, vegetated channels, vegetated terraces, and bodies of aufeis. (Landsat image.) The land-ocean aquatic continuum (LOAC) model of Regnier et al. (2013) builds a more detailed carbon budget for inland waters. Like the Cole et al. (2007) mass budget, carbon fluxes to the inland waters section (rivers, lakes, and reservoirs) of the LOAC (Figure 2) are bracketed by the total C delivered into inland waters from surrounding terrain (Ctot,in,) and the total C delivered out to estuaries (Ctot,out). The difference between these is balanced by fluxes arising from processes within the inland waters system: net primary production within the aquatic ecosystem (GPP-plant respiration), CNPP; gases released by respiration and decomposition of organic matter, CCO2 and CCH4; dissolved inorganic carbon from weathering, Cinorg,w; rock-derived petrogenic carbon, Cpetro, (Hilton and West 2020); and organic carbon burial Csed. The fluxes at the top of the box (CNPP, CCO2, and CCH4) reflect plant growth, decay, and microbial activity within the inland waters system. The fluxes at the bottom of the box (Cinorg,w , Cpetro, and Csed) arise from physical and (in the case of weathering) chemical interactions with sediments and bedrock. Because this is a budget, all fluxes sum to 0.
Figure 2. C budget of inland waters (modified from Regnier et al. 2013, inspired by Cole et al. 2007). The trapezoid mirrors the funneling of input (Ctot,in) from the surrounding watershed to the aquatic system. Fluxes across the top of the box are direct exchanges with the atmosphere, fluxes at the bottom of the box arise from groundwater (Cinorg,w) and production or deposition of sediment. C inputs from the terrestrial landscape (Ctot,in) generally exceed fluvial exports to the sea (Ctot,out).
Figure 3. Riverine corridors cross the continuous permafrost terrain of the North Slope of Alaska. Yellow arrows show sites on the Canning River where we have sampled to assess the carbon stock. Inset shows location in Alaska. (Landsat image)
Figure 4. Carbon budget refined to analyze carbon stocks (SCtot) in a braided river corridor segment. River corridors often widen downstream, as suggested with the widening trapezoid shape. Dark gray lines represent channels within the river corridor. Light gray and white areas represent different age geomorphic surfaces on which carbon stocks differ due to the time-integrated effects of CNPP, CCO2, CCH4, and Csed. The fluxes Cinorg,w and Cpetro are now included in Ctot,in and Ctot,out.
Figure 5. (Top) Hypothetical accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) over time on an undisturbed geomorphic surface. (Bottom) Areas (Ai) of four surfaces, numbered 1-4, of different ages that might be used in Equation 1 to compute total carbon stock in a reach (SCtot). The carbon stock for a reach of a river corridor (e.g., Figure 4) must account for the mosaic of different surface areas and states of vegetation succession and organic matter accumulation. The total carbon stock in a reach, SCtot, is therefore computed as the sum of the carbon stocks on all geomorphic surfaces:
A conceptual carbon budget for an icy riverine corridor

The contribution of river corridors to the global carbon budget exceeds their small areal footprint, yet our understanding of fluvial carbon dynamics is incomplete, particularly in periglacial settings. Frequent disturbance and lateral fluxes are key attributes of carbon budgets in riparian corridors. Climate change affects the pace and style of fluvial and biogeochemical processes in periglacial settings. The effects of these can be assessed with a carbon budget, a statement of all fluxes in and out of a control volume, which we outline for a river corridor. We are generating data from a field campaign of the carbon stock in select river corridor segments of the Canning River, Alaska. This gravel-bedded river drains continuous permafrost from glaciated headwaters in the Brooks Range to its delta in the Beaufort Sea. Fluvial erosion and deposition generate distinct, mappable geomorphic surfaces in the river corridor that accumulate carbon over time. Carbon stocks on surfaces are summed across the river corridor to compute the total carbon stock. Characterizing the depth of alluvium is a poorly constrained component of the carbon stock. Lateral bank erosion hews away geomorphic surfaces, while sediment deposition buries carbon and generates new surfaces. Deposition of uprooted willows or turf mats augment the carbon stock and can jump-start plant succession. All fluxes in the carbon budget are sensitive to warming and arctic hydrologic intensification. Analyzing how these fluxes may change and affect the carbon stock in icy river corridors will advance our understanding of their contribution to the global carbon budget.


Fig. 1. Map of the study area and wave climate. (A) historical paths of the Yellow River extracted from the Atlas of the Yellow River (91). (B) the locations of the observation station and model output transect and directional distribution of waves in the abandoned Yellow River delta. (C) Wave climate at the study site. the significant wave height (H s ) data in (B) and (c) were extracted from the nearest pixel of the ecMWF 40-year hindcast (1979-2018) at a water depth of ~21 m. Our wave climate analysis shows that waves are highest in winter, mainly driven by northeasterly winds.
Fig. 2. Morphological changes of the abandoned Yellow River delta. (A) changes in shoreline retreat rate, subaqueous delta erosion (negative)/deposition (positive) rate, and the long-term trend of significant wave height in the abandoned Yellow River delta since 1855 ce. (B) the continuous retreat of the 15-m isobath extracted from (31). (C) the 1979 bathymetric transect and the corresponding average combined current-wave bed shear stress during a winter storm event (21 January 2017) simulated by the delft3d model. the shoreline retreat rate and subaqueous delta erosion/deposition rate in (A) were calculated from published data (31, 92). time series of significant wave height were extracted from ecMWF eRA-20c Ocean Wave data from 1900 to 2010 (https://apps-dev.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/era20c-wave-daily/type=fc/), and the 10-year moving average annual significant wave height was calculated to reveal the long-term trend. the gray shaded area in (A) represents the period during which the shoreline was effectively protected by seawalls. the dashed gray line in (c) indicates the critical bed shear stress for cohesive sediment resuspension. the location of the model transect is shown in Fig. 1B.
Fig. 4. Time series of significant wave height, near-bed sediment concentration, and seabed elevation changes. (A) SSc at 0.45 m above the seabed from OBS and significant wave height (H s ) estimated by Adv measurements. (B) Seabed elevation changes and backscatter intensity profile recorded by ABS from 16 January 2017 to 14 February 2017. the gray shading indicates the period of the observed extreme resuspension event during the storm. during this period, the seabed experienced substantial erosion (3.6 cm), and a fluid mud layer was formed at the end of the event. the values labeled in (B) represent the average bed elevations over a 24-hour period.
Fig. 5. Idealized model setup and simulation results of the abandoned Yellow River delta. (A) initial bathymetry in 1578. (B) Modeled bathymetry in 1855 driven by tide and river input. (C) Modeled bathymetry in 2022 driven by tide only. (D) Modeled bathymetry in 2022 driven by tide, wind, and waves. (E) Modeled bathymetry in 2022 driven by tide, wind, and waves, and with seawall protection. the red solid line in (e) shows the location of the seawall implemented in the model.
Fig. 6. Global distribution of deltas influenced by both reduced sediment flux and seasonal storms. the purple shaded areas represent three critical zones (Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea, and east Asia) where deltas have experienced large reductions in fluvial sediment flux and are influenced by seasonal storms. Sediment flux data of major river deltas were compiled from (51, 89, 90).
Hidden delta degradation due to fluvial sediment decline and intensified marine storms

May 2024

·

537 Reads

·

12 Citations

Science Advances

Deltas are threatened by erosion due to climate change and reduced sediment supply, but their response to these changes remains poorly quantified. We investigate the abandoned Yellow River delta that has transitioned from rapid growth to ongoing deterioration due to a river avulsion removing the sediment supply. Integrating bathymetric data, process observations, and sediment transport modeling, we find that while the subaerial delta was stabilized by engineering measures, the subaqueous delta continued to erode due to intensified storms, losing 39% of its mass deposited before the avulsion. Long-term observations show that winter storms initiate scouring of the subaqueous delta, contributing up to 70% of seabed erosion. We then analyze 108 global deltas to assess subaqueous delta erosion risks and identify 17 deltas facing similar situations of sediment decline and storm intensification during the past 40 years. Our findings suggest that subaqueous delta erosion must be integrated into delta sustainability evaluations.


CSDMS Data Components: data–model integration tools for Earth surface processes modeling

March 2024

·

136 Reads

Progress in better understanding and modeling Earth surface systems requires an ongoing integration of data and numerical models. Advances are currently hampered by technical barriers that inhibit finding, accessing, and executing modeling software with related datasets. We propose a design framework for Data Components, which are software packages that provide access to particular research datasets or types of data. Because they use a standard interface based on the Basic Model Interface (BMI), Data Components can function as plug-and-play components within modeling frameworks to facilitate seamless data–model integration. To illustrate the design and potential applications of Data Components and their advantages, we present several case studies in Earth surface processes analysis and modeling. The results demonstrate that the Data Component design provides a consistent and efficient way to access heterogeneous datasets from multiple sources and to seamlessly integrate them with various models. This design supports the creation of open data–model integration workflows that can be discovered, accessed, and reproduced through online data sharing platforms, which promotes data reuse and improves research transparency and reproducibility.



Citations (68)


... Greater precipitation that is occurring in autumn is altering dissolved organic matter, nutrient and solute export from both glacial [100,101] and non-glacial permafrost catchments [40]. Increasing precipitation intensity in the Arctic [16,42] may increase particulate material and carbon fluxes [40,102]. Further, longer flow seasons are also linked to increased thawing of catchment soils [69] and subsequent effects on subsurface flows and the chemistry of groundwater discharging to streams [87]. ...

Reference:

Observing Northern High-Latitude River Systems to Understand Changes in a Warming Arctic
Impacts of convective storms on runoff, erosion, and carbon export in a continuous permafrost landscape

... Coastal erosion, therefore, is the most probable sediment source, consistent with shoreline retreat of 7-10 m/yr along the northern coast and 3-8 m/yr along the western coast of the IGoT, primarily driven by subaerial and subaqueous delta subsidence as well as rapid sea-level rise (Figures 1b and 1c; Bidorn et al., 2021;Sok et al., 2022). In the Chao Phraya Delta, with a gentle slope (1 m/km) and 1.5-2.5 m tidal ranges (Bidorn et al., 2021), subaqueous erosion can extends 1.5-2.5 km offshore (Saito, 2000), similar to the abandoned Yellow River Delta, where subaqueous erosion redistributes 500 Mt/yr of sediment, particularly during storms (Zhu et al., 2024). In the IGoT, evidence from sediment cores, such as abnormally low excess 210 Pb layers interrupting successions of normally high excess 210 Pb, indicating rapid storm-driven deposition of older eroded material, supported by local accounts from coastal villages like the Ban Khun Samut Chin (Burnett et al., 2023). ...

Hidden delta degradation due to fluvial sediment decline and intensified marine storms

Science Advances

... Rock glacier destabilization, not to be confused with slope instabilities in a geotechnical context, refers to the kinematic behavior of a drastic increase in velocity of up to two orders of magnitude relative to the past rate, accompanied by the development of shear and tension cracks. Over the past two decades, destabilized rock glaciers have occurred more frequently (Allstadt et al., 2024;Avian et al., 2005;Bodin et al., 2017;Delaloye et al., 2013;Ghirlanda et al., 2016;Morriss et al., 2023;Roer et al., 2008). Historical imagery revealed cyclic behavior of destabilization on Äußeres Hochebenkar rock glacier in the Austrian Alps: the first cycle occurred from the 1950s to the mid-1970s; and the second cycle initiated around 2017 and lasted until today (Hartl et al., 2023). ...

Alpine hillslope failure in the western US: insights from the Chaos Canyon landslide, Rocky Mountain National Park, USA

... This influx enhances coastal productivity by supplying organic material that fuels microbial and phytoplankton activity, yet it also accelerates the breakdown of ancient organic matter, leading to increased CO₂ and methane emissions 12 . Studies suggest that approximately one-third of Arctic primary production is supported by terrigenous organic inputs 13,14 , indicating a fundamental shift in nutrient cycling driven by permafrost-derived sediments. Additionally, rising sediment loads affect the efficiency of carbon sequestration in marine sediments, potentially reducing the Arctic Ocean's role as a carbon sink while altering the balance between organic carbon burial and remineralization 15 . ...

Warming-driven erosion and sediment transport in cold regions

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

... Their calculations reveal that 65%-78% of the total annual sediment load was transported during the summer months (June to August), which largely reflected precipitation patterns and extreme melting events in the study area. In the study by Hasholt et al. (2022), the difficulties of monitoring the amount of sediment released into the ocean from glaciers by calving and further transport as icebergs are highlighted and, based on the investigation of tidewater glaciers in Scoresby Sound, East Greenland, a method for systematically collecting ice from icebergs and a strategy for obtaining representative samples of the sediment contained within them is reported. ...

Sediments in icebergs and IRD transport, Scoresby Sound, East Greenland
  • Citing Article
  • September 2022

Hydrological Processes

... In the bedrock-deposit-topography system, the geometry of the bedrock controls both the movement of landslide material and the pattern of its deposition. This coupling is critical in landslide evolution, particularly in long-runout events (Campforts et al. 2022;Chen et al. 2024). ...

The Art of Landslides: How Stochastic Mass Wasting Shapes Topography and Influences Landscape Dynamics

... Researchers have investigated flow distribution within deltas through field studies (Hiatt and Passalacqua, 2015;Wagner and Mohrig, 2019;Sassi et al., 2012;Dong et al., 2020), laboratory experiments (Paola et al., 2009;Piliouras et al., 2017;Miller et al., 2019), remote sensing techniques (Tejedor et al., 2015(Tejedor et al., , 2017Hariharan et al., 2022), and hydrodynamic simulations (Maicu et al., 2018;Gao et al., 2024). In recent years, numerous studies have employed numerical models to analyze the effects of tidal currents (Canestrelli et al., 2010;Hoitink et al., 2017), vegetation (Nardin and Edmonds, 2014;Nardin et al., 2016), or permafrost (Lauzon et al., 2019;Overeem et al., 2022) on delta morphology. These investigations are essential to inform active management strategies (Edmonds et al., 2022). ...

Ice-dominated Arctic deltas

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

... In addition to this command-line interface, users may interact with doublemanning as a Python module. Its function structure follows CSDMS standards (Peckham et al., 2013;Overeem et al., 2013;Tucker et al., 2022). One may use it to produce and update rating curves and to translate between stage and discharge as a standalone module or as part of a coupled hydraulic-geomorphic modeling system. ...

CSDMS: a community platform for numerical modeling of Earth surface processes

... From these values we calculate that suspended sediments represent 86-93% of riverine particle delivery to the oceans, in line with our calculation that river bottom sediments contribute a relatively small proportion to marine sediments compared with the suspended load. In addition, there is an estimated 0.5-1.5 Pg y −1 contribution to marine sediments from aeolian sources [68,69] and 0.8 Pg y −1 from glacial melting [69] (table 5). ...

Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

... Autonomous and depositional wetland types represent the ends of a continuum, although the end members can flip from one mode to the other as can be seen in the alternating deposits of peat and silt in deep deltaic sediments (Törnqvist et al. 2008). The depositional type is more likely found in tropical latitudes where river basins can produce and transport more sediment than basins of similar scale located in the temperate zone (Syvitski et al. 2017). Currently, the greatest losses of marsh area, measured remotely, are due to edge erosion (Campbell et al. 2022), which is a consequence of rising sea level and the subsequent increase in the tidal prism volume (Gardner and Bohn 1980). ...

Latitudinal Controls on Siliciclastic Sediment Production and Transport
  • Citing Chapter
  • April 2019