I. Radermacher’s research while affiliated with RWTH Aachen University and other places

Background: Applying a hierarchy of cues is a well-established method in therapy for aphasic naming disorders (see overview in Nickels, 2002b; and Hillis & Caramazza, 1994; Wambaugh, 2003). Usually, cues are used in the increasing direction. Giving assistance as sparsely as possible, the naming of an individual item remains effortful which enhances the chance to recall it later on. But the high opportunity to make errors may be disadvantageous. As an alternative, the method of vanishing cues (see Glisky, 1992), which was designed for treatment of memory disorders, provides as much assistance as needed, thereby helping patients to avoid errors (see Riley & Heaton, 2000). Therefore, this method complies with “errorless learning” (see Baddeley & Wilson, 1994). It is favoured when amnesic patients have to learn new information. In aphasia therapy, the errorless learning procedure may be interesting for patients with severe naming disorders because it prevents them from producing frequent errors. Aims : The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of increasing and vanishing cues for aphasic patients with naming disorders in a 4-week therapy programme. As patients may differ in the underlying mechanism of impairment, we expected a different therapy effect among and within patients. Furthermore, the importance of errorless learning should increase with severity of impairment because of error opportunity. Methods & Procedures : A total of 100 line drawings were selected and split into four sets of 25 items each. The sets were assigned to four conditions: control (no training), vanishing cue, increasing cue, and both-cue condition (training with both methods). Then 20 therapy sessions were ordered according to the alternating treatments design. During treatment, the patient's attempts to name a picture were assisted by a hierarchy of oral cues given by the therapist. Treatment methods differed in order of application but not in the type of cues used. Outcomes & Results : Cueing therapy in general was effective for 8 of 10 patients. Those patients with moderate naming disorders profited less than those with severe naming disorders. Both methods differed among and within patients. However, in contrast to our prediction, we found no patient who improved only under vanishing cues but several who showed positive effects with increasing cues alone or with both, increasing and vanishing cues. Conclusions : Unlike patients with amnesia, patients with aphasia do not seem to be troubled by their errors and may not require the vanishing cue method.

The study for the first time compared the well-known method of increasing cues to the method of vanishing cues (adaptive increasing-decreasing cueing) which was novel in aphasia rehabilitation (and SLT) and was based on the theoretical underpinnings by Abel (2001, Magisterarbeit). Vanishing cues feature errorless learning. The study was supported by the Helmut-Bauer Prize for Rehabilitation (German Society of Neurology).

In this functional positron emission tomography study brain activations during an auditory lexical decision task with two experimental conditions were investigated. First, the subjects had to discriminate between real words and nonwords; second, real words varied with pseudowords. Comparing each of these tasks to an auditory control condition we found bilateral activation of the superior temporal and inferior frontal gyrus, lateralized to the left in the pseudoword condition. The comparison of the lexical decision tasks revealed higher rCBF during the pseudo-/real word decisions within BA 47, adjacent to Broca's area, and the anterior cingulate. The data support the notion that the lexical decision during a nonword task is mainly based on a phonological discrimination process, whereas a pseudoword task more strongly requires lexical access resulting in activation of BA 47.

Alertness, the most basic intensity aspect of attention, probably is a prerequisite for the more complex and capacity demanding domains of attention selectivity. Behaviorally, intrinsic alertness represents the internal (cognitive) control of wakefulness and arousal; typical tasks to assess optimal levels of intrinsic alertness are simple reaction time measurements without preceding warning stimuli. Up until now only parts of the cerebral network subserving alertness have been revealed in animal, lesion, and functional imaging studies. Here, in a 15O-butanol PET activation study in 15 right-handed young healthy male volunteers for this basic attention function we found an extended right hemisphere network including frontal (anterior cingulate-dorsolateral cortical)-inferior parietal-thalamic (pulvinar and possibly the reticular nucleus) and brainstem (ponto-mesencephalic tegmentum, possibly involving the locus coeruleus) structures, when subjects waited for and rapidly responded to a centrally presented white dot by pressing a response key with the right-hand thumb.