Hua-Jung Li’s research while affiliated with National Chung Hsing University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (13)


ST6GAL1-Mediated Sialylation of PECAM-1 Promotes a Transcellular Diapedesis-Like Process that Directs Lung Tropism of Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Article

December 2024

·

6 Reads

Cancer Research

Shih-Yin Chen

·

Pei-Lin He

·

Li-Yu Lu

·

[...]

·

Hua-Jung Li

Metastasis is the leading cause of mortality in breast cancer, with lung metastasis being particularly detrimental. Identification of the processes determining metastatic organotropism could enable the development of approaches to prevent and treat breast cancer metastasis. Here, we found that lung-tropic and non-lung-tropic breast cancer cells differ in their response to sialic acids, affecting the sialylation of surface proteins. Lung-tropic cells showed higher levels of ST6GAL1, while non-lung-tropic cells had more ST3GAL1. ST6GAL1-mediated α-2,6-sialylation, unlike ST3GAL1-mediated α-2,3-sialylation, increased lung metastasis by promoting cancer cell migration through pulmonary endothelial layers and reducing junction protein levels. α-2,6-sialylated PECAM-1 on breast cancer cells facilitated extravasation through the pulmonary endothelium, a critical step in lung metastasis. Knockdown of ST6GAL1 or PECAM-1 significantly reduced lung metastasis. Human pulmonary endothelium displayed high PECAM-1 levels. Through transhomophilic interaction with pulmonary PECAM-1, α-2,6-sialylated PECAM-1 on ST6GAL1-positive cancer cells increased pulmonary extravasation in a diapedesis-like, cell-autonomous manner. Additionally, lung-tropic cells and their exosomes increased the permeability of pulmonary endothelial cells, promoting metastasis in a non-cell-autonomous manner. Analysis of human breast cancer samples showed a correlation between elevated ST6GAL1/PECAM-1 expression and lung metastasis. These results suggest that targeting ST6GAL1-mediated α-2,6-sialylation could be a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent lung metastasis in breast cancer patients.



Ago2/CAV1 interaction potentiates metastasis via controlling Ago2 localization and miRNA action

April 2024

·

16 Reads

·

3 Citations

EMBO Reports

Ago2 differentially regulates oncogenic and tumor-suppressive miRNAs in cancer cells. This discrepancy suggests a secondary event regulating Ago2/miRNA action in a context-dependent manner. We show here that a positive charge of Ago2 K212, that is preserved by SIR2-mediated Ago2 deacetylation in cancer cells, is responsible for the direct interaction between Ago2 and Caveolin-1 (CAV1). Through this interaction, CAV1 sequesters Ago2 on the plasma membranes and regulates miRNA-mediated translational repression in a compartment-dependent manner. Ago2/CAV1 interaction plays a role in miRNA-mediated mRNA suppression and in miRNA release via extracellular vesicles (EVs) from tumors into the circulation, which can be used as a biomarker of tumor progression. Increased Ago2/CAV1 interaction with tumor progression promotes aggressive cancer behaviors, including metastasis. Ago2/CAV1 interaction acts as a secondary event in miRNA-mediated suppression and increases the complexity of miRNA actions in cancer.


Exosomal 2′,3′‐CNP from mesenchymal stem cells promotes hippocampus CA1 neurogenesis/neuritogenesis and contributes to rescue of cognition/learning deficiencies of damaged brain
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2020

·

106 Reads

·

33 Citations

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used in clinical studies to treat neurological diseases and damage. However, implanted MSCs do not achieve their regenerative effects by differentiating into and replacing neural cells. Instead, MSC secretome components mediate the regenerative effects of MSCs. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs)/exosomes carry cargo responsible for rescuing brain damage. We previously showed that EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes have enhanced regenerative potential to rescue hippocampal damage, compared with EVs/exosomes from untreated MSCs. Here we show that EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes promote neurosphere formation in vitro and increase neurogenesis and neuritogenesis in damaged hippocampi; basal MSC EVs/exosomes do not contribute to these regenerative effects. 2′,3′-Cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (CNP) levels in EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes are 20-fold higher than CNP levels in basal MSC EVs/exosomes. Decreasing elevated exosomal CNP levels in EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes reduced the efficacy of these EVs/exosomes in promoting β3-tubulin polymerization and in converting toxic 2′,3′-cAMP into neuroprotective adenosine. CNP-depleted EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes lost the ability to promote neurogenesis and neuritogenesis in damaged hippocampi. Systemic administration of EV/exosomes from EP4-antagonist derived MSC EVs/exosomes repaired cognition, learning, and memory deficiencies in mice caused by hippocampal damage. In contrast, CNP-depleted EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes failed to repair this damage. Exosomal CNP contributes to the ability of EP4 antagonist-elicited MSC EVs/exosomes to promote neurogenesis and neuritogenesis in damaged hippocampi and recovery of cognition, memory, and learning. This experimental approach should be generally applicable to identifying the role of EV/exosomal components in eliciting a variety of biological responses. Significance statement Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have therapeutic effects for neurological diseases and damage; however, their therapeutic effects are mediated by components of the MSC secretome. Compared with basal MSC EVs/exosomes, EP4 antagonist-induced MSC EVs/exosomes have superior regenerative ability to rescue damaged brain functions. Elevated CNP levels are required for the enhanced ability of EP4-induced MSC EVs/exosomes to promote β3-tubulin polymerization, decrease toxic 2′,3′-cAMP, produce neuroprotective adenosine, induce neurogenesis, and elicit neuritogenesis in damaged hippocampi. At a functional level, elevated EV/exosome CNP levels are required to rescue cognition and learning deficiencies caused by this damage. These data suggest that CNP modulation is a potential target for treating brain damage and neural degeneration diseases. Moreover, these results suggest a generalized approach to identifying causal roles for EV/exosome cargo components in a variety of regenerative applications.

Download

Figure 1. Blocking prostaglandin E 2 /prostaglandin E 2 receptor 4 signaling of mesenchymal stem cells decreases the stem cell properties. (A): Bright-field images of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) treated with DMSO vehicle (Crl) or GW627368X (GW; 20 μg/ml) for 96 hours. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B): The numbers of MSCs treated with DMSO (MSC) or GW (GW-MSC) for 4 days. Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3). **, p ≤ .01; ***, p ≤ .001. (C): Sub-G1 profiles of MSCs treated with vehicle (MSC, upper left panel) or GW (GW-MSC, upper right panel) for 96 hours, using flow cytometry. DNA fragmentation in apoptotic cells is revealed by sub-G1 population on DNA content. Percentages of sub-G1, G0/G1, and S + G2M cell populations are calculated using FlowJo (bottom panel). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3). (D): Activation of apoptotic protein caspase 3 upon proteolytic cleavage in MSCs treated with vehicle (MSC) or GW (GW-MSC), measured with Western blotting. (E): Cell surface CD90 and CD105 of MSCs treated with vehicle (upper panels) or GW (lower panels) for 4 days. (F-H): (Figure legend continues on next page.)
Figure 2. Blocking prostaglandin E 2 /prostaglandin E 2 receptor 4 signaling of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) elicits the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and exosomal protein sorting. (A, B): Vesicle size and numbers of EVs released from MSCs and GW627368X (GW)-treated MSCs (MSC-GW). Nanoparticle tracking analysis determined the vesicle size in panel (A), vesicle numbers are in panel (B). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3). **, p ≤ .005. (C, D): Total EV proteins released from MSCs and MSCGWs were measured, on a per-cell basis (C) and on a per-EV basis (D). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3). ***, p ≤ .001. (E): Proteins were analyzed in the EVs from the same number of MSCs. The EVs were isolated from the same number of DMSO-treated or GW-treated MSCs, and compared on a per-cell basis. D1-4 are proteins in EVs isolated from day 1 to 4 cell cultures. D5-8 are EVs isolated from day 5 to 8 cell cultures. (F, G): Cytokines were measured in the same number of EVs from MSCs or GW-treated MSCs (MSCGW), compared on a per-vesicle basis. Cytokines were measured using cytokine arrays in panel (F) and bioPlex pro cytokine assays in panel (G). The cytokines differentially expressed in the EVs are listed in panel (F). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3). *, p ≤ .05. (C): Proteins from the same number of EVs from different batches of MSCs (DMSO) and GW-treated MSCs (GW) were analyzed.
Figure 3. Prostaglandin E 2 receptor 4 antagonist-elicited mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) rescue memory and learning deficiencies caused by hippocampal damage. (A): The tetracycline/doxycycline-regulated gene switch of Camk2a-tTA/tetO-diphtheria toxin A (DTA) transgenic mice. Camk2a-tTA/tetO-DTA transgenic mice express the tetracycline/doxycycline-suppressed transactivator protein (tTA) under control of the Camk2a promoter. DTA is not expressed in the presence of Dox, but is expressed in the absence of Dox, causing damage in hippocampus CA1. Abbreviation: TRE, tetracycline/doxycycline response element. (B): Hematoxylin and eosin staining and antiNeuN immunofluorescence in the hippocampus of Dox-withdrawn tetO-DTA mice (DTA, undamaged control [UC]) and Camk2a-tTA/tetO-DTA (Camk2a/DTA, damaged control [DC]) mice. Arrows: hippocampus CA1 neurons. Scale bar: 100 μm. Left panel: the blue box in schematic depiction of the brain section represents the anatomic region analyzed by staining. Red lines, hippocampus. (C): EV uptake into hippocampus CA1. PKH26-labeled MSC EVs, PKH26-labeled GW-induced MSC EVs (GWEVs), and negative control (see Supporting Information Materials and Methods) were administrated into mice via intracardiac injection. At 16 hours after the injection, mice were sacrificed and the brains were collected for further analysis. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Quantification of PKH26-positive area in hippocampus CA1 of the mice described in the right panel. Data are mean AE SEM (n = 9 for each group). ***, p ≤ .001. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D): The scheme of the mice learning and memory experiments, indicating the time points of damage induction, EV administration, and behavioral analyses. (E-G): The time spent by Dox-withdrawn DTA mice (UC) and by Dox-withdrawn Camk2a/DTA mice treated with PBS (DC), MSCEVs (EV), and MSCGWEVs (GWEV), on exploring novel locations (panel E), exploring novel objects (panel F), and finding the platform in the water maze (panel G). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 8 mice in each group). *, p ≤ .05; **, p ≤ .005; ***, p ≤ .001. © 2019 The Authors. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Figure 4. Prostaglandin E 2 receptor 4 (EP 4 ) antagonist-elicited mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) increase the expression of genes involved in anti-inflammation in damaged hippocampus. (A): The scheme of the animal experiments, indicating the time points of damage induction, EV administration, and sample collection. (B): Levels of gene expression in the hippocampi of Dox-withdrawn Camk2a/DTA mice at 5 days after the treatment of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), MSC EVs (MSCEV), or EP 4 antagonist-elicited MSC EVs (MSCGWEV). Red dots/green dots: genes with twofold higher/lower expression in EV-treated and GW-induced MSC EV (GWEV)-treated hippocampi. (C, D): Gene ontology enrichment analyses of the genes with greater than twofold different expression between PBS-treated and MSCGWEV-treated hippocampi. The pie chart shows the functional groups with an enrichment p-value <.05. The table shows gene percentage, enrichment score, and enrichment p-value of the functional groups. These values are calculated using Partek GO enrichment analysis. (E): Upstream regulators, identified using ingenuity pathway analysis, of the genes differentially expressed (>twofold) in PBS-treated and MSCGWEV-treated hippocampi. Red bars: regulators involved in anti-inflammation. (F): Top 10 mRNAs elevated in the MSC GWEV-conditioned hippocampi, compared with that of MSC EV-conditioned hippocampi. The bars indicate the fold expression of the genes for the mice treated as indicated in the panel.
Figure 5. Prostaglandin E 2 receptor 4 antagonist-elicited mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) suppress reactive astrogliosis. (A): Expression of A1 and A2 astrocyte markers was measured in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-treated, MSCEV-treated, and MSCGWEV-treated astrocytes. (B): Expression of A2 astrocyte marker COX-2 was analyzed in PBS-treated, MSCEV-treated, and MSCGWEV-treated astrocytes. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 50 μm. (C): Levels of astrocyte marker and inducer mRNA expression in the hippocampi of Dox-withdrawn Camk2a/DTA mice treated with MSCGWEVs, compared with that of the MSCEVtreated mice. (D-F): Immunofluorescence analyses of the hippocampi of Dox-withdrawn DTA mice (undamaged control) and Doxwithdrawn Camk2a/DTA mice at 5 days and 30 days after the treatment of PBS (damaged control), MSCEVs (EV), or MSCGWEVs (GWEV), using antibodies against C3, GFAP, and S100β. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Upper panel: the blue box in schematic depiction of the brain section represents the anatomic region analyzed by immunostaining. Red lines, hippocampus. Quantification of C3, GFAP + astrocytes, and GFAP + /S100β + astrocytes in hippocampi of mice is in panel (E). Data are mean AE SEM (n = 3 mice for each group). *, p ≤ .05; **, p ≤ .005; ***, p ≤ .001. Images in panel (F) are 30-day hippocampal GFAP/DAPI images with higher magnifications from two mice in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 50 μm. © 2019 The Authors. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press

+2

EP 4 Antagonist‐Elicited Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rescue Cognition/Learning Deficiencies by Restoring Brain Cellular Functions

March 2019

·

186 Reads

·

34 Citations

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

Adult brains have limited regenerative capacity. Consequently, both brain damage and neurodegenerative diseases often cause functional impairment for patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), one type of adult stem cells, can be isolated from various adult tissues. MSCs have been used in clinical trials to treat human diseases and the therapeutic potentials of the MSC‐derived secretome and extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been under investigation. We found that blocking the prostaglandin E2/prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 (PGE2/EP4) signaling pathway in MSCs with EP4 antagonists increased EV release and promoted the sorting of specific proteins, including anti‐inflammatory cytokines and factors that modify astrocyte function, blood–brain barrier integrity, and microglial migration into the damaged hippocampus, into the EVs. Systemic administration of EP4 antagonist‐elicited MSC EVs repaired deficiencies of cognition, learning and memory, inhibited reactive astrogliosis, attenuated extensive inflammation, reduced microglial infiltration into the damaged hippocampus, and increased blood–brain barrier integrity when administered to mice following hippocampal damage. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019 Brain damage is associated with reactive astrogliosis, extensive inflammation, broken blood–brain barrier, and microglial infiltration into the damaged area. Prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 antagonist‐elicited mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicles, which are enriched in IL‐2, IL‐10, vascular endothelial growth factor‐a, and BDNF, suppress reactive astrogliosis and inflammation and allow the recovery of CNS neurons, blood–brain barrier, and behavioral function.


PGE2/EP4 antagonism enhances tumor chemosensitivity by inducing extracellular vesicle‐mediated clearance of cancer stem cells

September 2017

·

29 Reads

·

27 Citations

International Journal of Cancer

Cells expressing mesenchymal/basal phenotypes in tumors have been associated with stem cell properties. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are often resistant to conventional chemotherapy. We explored overcoming mesenchymal CSC resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Our goal was to reduce CSC numbers in vivo, in conjunction with chemotherapy, to reduce tumor burden. Analysis of clinical samples demonstrated that COX‐2/PGE2/EP4 signaling is elevated in basal‐like and chemoresistant breast carcinoma and is correlated with survival and relapse of breast cancer. EP4 antagonism elicts a striking shift of breast cancer cells from a mesenchymal/CSC state to a more epithelial non‐CSC state. The transition was mediated by EP4 antagonist‐induced extracellular vesicles [(EVs)/exosomes] which removed CSC markers, mesenchymal markers, integrins, and drug efflux transporters from the CSCs. In addition, EP4 antagonism‐induced CSC EVs/exosomes can convert tumor epithelial/non‐CSCs to mesenchymal/CSCs able to give rise to tumors and to promote tumor cell dissemination. Because of its ability to induce a CSC‐to‐non‐CSC transition, EP4 antagonist treatment in vivo reduced the numbers of CSCs within tumors and increased tumor chemosensitivity. EP4 antagonist treatment enhances tumor response to chemotherapy by reducing the numbers of chemotherapy‐resistant CSCs available to repopulate the tumor. EP4 antagonism can collaborate with conventional chemotherapy to reduce tumor burden. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Transfer of Mammary Gland-forming Ability Between Mammary Basal Epithelial Cells and Mammary Luminal Cells via Extracellular Vesicles/Exosomes

June 2017

·

19 Reads

·

6 Citations

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Cells can communicate via exosomes, ~100-nm extracellular vesicles (EVs) that contain proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids Non-adherent/mesenchymal mammary epithelial cell (NAMEC)-derived extracellular vesicles can be isolated from NAMEC medium via differential ultracentrifugation. Based on their density, EVs can be purified via ultracentrifugation at 110,000 x g. The EV preparation from ultracentrifugation can be further separated using a continuous density gradient to prevent contamination with soluble proteins. The purified EVs can then be further evaluated using nanoparticle-tracking analysis, which measures the size and number of vesicles in the preparation. The extracellular vesicles with a size ranging from 50 to 150 nm are exosomes. The NAMEC-derived EVs/exosomes can be ingested by mammary epithelial cells, which can be measured by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Some mammary stem cell properties (e.g., mammary gland-forming ability) can be transferred from the stem-like NAMECs to mammary epithelial cells via the NAMEC-derived EVs/exosomes. Isolated primary EpCAMhi/CD49flo luminal mammary epithelial cells cannot form mammary glands after being transplanted into mouse fat pads, while EpCAMlo/CD49fhi basal mammary epithelial cells form mammary glands after transplantation. Uptake of NAMEC-derived EVs/exosomes by EpCAMhi/CD49flo luminal mammary epithelial cells allows them to generate mammary glands after being transplanted into fat pads. The EVs/exosomes derived from stem-like mammary epithelial cells transfer mammary gland-forming ability to EpCAMhi/CD49flo luminal mammary epithelial cells.



PGE 2 /EP 4 Signaling Controls the Transfer of the Mammary Stem Cell State by Lipid Rafts in Extracellular Vesicles: EP 4 Controls MaSC State by Extracellular Vesicles

August 2016

·

40 Reads

·

25 Citations

Stem Cells

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-initiated signaling contributes to stem cell homeostasis and regeneration. However, it is unclear how PGE2 signaling controls cell stemness. This study identifies a previously unknown mechanism by which PGE2/prostaglandin E receptor 4 (EP4) signaling regulates multiple signaling pathways (e.g., PI3K/Akt signaling, TGFβ signaling, Wnt signaling, EGFR signaling) which maintain the basal mammary stem cell phenotype. A shift of basal mammary epithelial stem cells (MaSCs) from a mesenchymal/stem cell state to a non-basal-MaSC state occurs in response to prostaglandin E receptor 4 (EP4) antagonism. EP4 antagonists elicit release of signaling components, by controlling their trafficking into extracellular vesicles/exosomes in a lipid raft/caveolae-dependent manner. Consequently, EP4 antagonism indirectly inactivates, through induced extracellular vesicle/exosome release, pathways required for mammary epithelial stem cell homeostasis, e.g. canonical/noncanonical Wnt, TGFβ and PI3K/Akt pathways. EP4 antagonism causes signaling receptors and signaling components to shift from non-lipid raft fractions to lipid raft fractions, and to then be released in EP4 antagonist-induced extracellular vesicles/exosomes, resulting in the loss of the stem cell state by mammary epithelial stem cells. In contrast, luminal mammary epithelial cells can acquire basal stem cell properties following ingestion of EP4 antagonist-induced stem cell extracellular vesicles/exosomes, and can then form mammary glands. These findings demonstrate that PGE2/EP4 signaling controls homeostasis of mammary epithelial stem cells through regulating extracellular vesicle/exosome release. Reprogramming of mammary epithelial cells can result from EP4-mediated stem cell property transfer by extracellular vesicles/exosomes containing caveolae-associated proteins, between mammary basal and luminal epithelial cells. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Figure 1.   Carcinoma cell–secreted IL-1 induces PGE 2 production in MSCs. A, PGE 2 (a) and COX-2 (b) were measured in the indicated conditioned medium or cultures. PGE 2 data are means ± SE, n = 3. ***, P < 0.005 (vs. that in LoVo medium). LoVo + MSC; LoVo lysate and MSC lysate mixed in equal 
Figure 5. COX-2-PGE 2 signaling is required for MSC-induced increase in ALDH high CSC-enriched population and tumor initiation. A, ALDH1 protein expression in LoVo cells treated as indicated for 5 days. B, ALDH activity of LoVo cells treated with vehicle, PGE 2 (100 nmol/L), or GW627368X (20 μmol/L) was analyzed by fl ow cytometry. The percentages indicate the percentage of ALDH high LoVo cells; that is, LoVo cells with ALDH activity beyond the indicated thresholds. The gray line at the right side of the plot indicates the threshold of the high ALDH activity. C, ALDH1 protein levels in various carcinoma cells treated with vehicle or PGE 2. The numbers indicate relative protein levels. D, PGE 2 increases LoVo TICs. LoVo cells pretreated with vehicle or PGE 2 (100 nmol/L) were injected into SCID mice (5 × 10 4 cells per injection). After 6 weeks, tumors were isolated and weighed. Bars are means ± SE. E, LoVo cells were cultured with tdTomato-MSCs, PGE 2 , NS398, or GW627368X, as indicated. After 5 days, the LoVo cells were isolated by cell sorting and injected into SCID mice (5 × 10 4 cells per injection). After 7 weeks, the tumors were isolated and weighed. Filled circles indicate individual tumor weights; open circles indicate no tumor grew at the site of injection. Bars are means ± SE. F, a, levels of PGE 2 secreted by LoVoCM-treated MSCshsc and MSCshcox-2. Data are means ± SE, n = 3. b, weights of tumors derived from LoVo cells (5 × 10 4 cells per injection) injected into SCID mice either alone, with MSCshsc, or with MSCshcox-2 (2 × 10 5 cells per injection). Filled circles indicate individual tumor weights; open circles indicate no tumor grew at the site of injection. Bars are means ± SE.
Cancer-Stimulated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Create a Carcinoma Stem Cell Niche via Prostaglandin E2 Signaling

July 2012

·

141 Reads

·

318 Citations

Cancer Discovery

Unlabelled: Mesenchymal cells of the tumor-associated stroma are critical determinants of carcinoma cell behavior. We focus here on interactions of carcinoma cells with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which are recruited to the tumor stroma and, once present, are able to influence the phenotype of the carcinoma cells. We find that carcinoma cell-derived interleukin-1 (IL-1) induces prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) secretion by MSCs. The resulting PGE(2) operates in an autocrine manner, cooperating with ongoing paracrine IL-1 signaling, to induce expression of a group of cytokines by the MSCs. The PGE(2) and cytokines then proceed to act in a paracrine fashion on the carcinoma cells to induce activation of β-catenin signaling and formation of cancer stem cells. These observations indicate that MSCs and derived cell types create a cancer stem cell niche to enable tumor progression via release of PGE(2) and cytokines. Significance: Although PGE2 has been implicated time and again in fostering tumorigenesis, its effects on carcinoma cells that contribute specifically to tumor formation are poorly understood. Here we show that tumor cells are able to elicit a strong induction of the COX-2/microsomal prostaglandin-E synthase-1 (mPGES-1)/PGE(2) axis in MSCs recruited to the tumor-associated stroma by releasing IL-1, which in turn elicits a mesenchymal/stem cell–like phenotype in the carcinoma cells.


Citations (9)


... EVs are involved in several physiological mechanisms closely related to SCZ, including cellular communication [81]. The EVs derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-exo) facilitate neurogenesis and promote neuronal recovery by delivering trophic factors, vasoactive factors, and immunomodulatory factors to injured microglia and neurons while suppressing detrimental immune responses [82]. Tsivion-Visbord [83] et al. (2020) have shown that MSC-derived EVs improve SCZ-like behavior in mouse models of SCZ. ...

Reference:

The Interrelationships between Cytokines and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review
Exosomal 2′,3′‐CNP from mesenchymal stem cells promotes hippocampus CA1 neurogenesis/neuritogenesis and contributes to rescue of cognition/learning deficiencies of damaged brain

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

... These authors also demonstrated that a siRNA present in these EVs was released into the brain and induced specific effect in different brain regions, thus supporting an effective transport of EVs into the brain. Chen et al. [36] and Cui et al. [37] also reported evidences for the presence of peripherally administered MSC-EVs into the brain. Although some strategies have been developed to improve the entry of EVs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by avoiding their phagocytosis by macrophages and processing in the liver, it has been shown that even without any modification EVs cross the BBB in a good proportion [38]. ...

EP 4 Antagonist‐Elicited Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rescue Cognition/Learning Deficiencies by Restoring Brain Cellular Functions

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE

... AiP plays important role in tissue regeneration and wound healing process [53][54][55], additionally it promotes the abnormal proliferation and growth of neoplastic cells. In fact, researchers documented that AiP has a role in carcinogenesis by promoting tumor repopulation and treatment resistance [56][57][58][59]. ...

PGE2/EP4 antagonism enhances tumor chemosensitivity by inducing extracellular vesicle‐mediated clearance of cancer stem cells
  • Citing Article
  • September 2017

International Journal of Cancer

... The complex regulation of mammary gland development has been extensively studied at the genetic [9], physiological [10], and morphological levels [8]. Exosomes evidently play a key role in different stages of mammary gland development; in particular, they are associated with the proliferation and differentiation of mammary gland cells [11]. ...

Transfer of Mammary Gland-forming Ability Between Mammary Basal Epithelial Cells and Mammary Luminal Cells via Extracellular Vesicles/Exosomes
  • Citing Article
  • June 2017

Journal of Visualized Experiments

... For example, PGE2/EP4 signaling controls the homeostasis of MaSCs through SEVs release regulation. MaSCs reprogramming can result from EP4-mediated stem cell property SEVs transfer between mammary basal and luminal epithelial cells [168]. MiR-130a-3p inhibits migration and invasion of MaSCs by regulating Rab5B [169]. ...

PGE 2 /EP 4 Signaling Controls the Transfer of the Mammary Stem Cell State by Lipid Rafts in Extracellular Vesicles: EP 4 Controls MaSC State by Extracellular Vesicles

Stem Cells

... Moreover, MSCs are responsible for the production of chemokines and cytokines. Under the influence of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), MSCs produce prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), resulting in increased cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression resulting in cancer progression and its drug resistance [27,28]. Moreover, IL-6 produced by MSCs increases CSCs expressing CD133 in colorectal cancer cells leading to tumor progression [15]. ...

Cancer-Stimulated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Create a Carcinoma Stem Cell Niche via Prostaglandin E2 Signaling

Cancer Discovery

... In order to prevent expression of therapeutic transgenes in non-HCC cells and limit toxicity in normal cells, targeting at the level of transcription with these TSPs can be used (Figure 3; Robson & Hirst, 2003). The proof of efficacy of transcriptional targeting using TSPs has been documented for different cancer types including prostate cancer (Figueiredo et al., 2006;Coulter et al., 2010), breast cancer (Li et al., 2005), colorectal cancer (Li et al., 2009), non-small cell lung cancer (Pasini et al., 2015), melanoma (Lu et al., 2005) and ovarian cancer (Casado et al., 2001) using adenoviral vectors. HSV-TK Suicide gene therapy HCC cell lines Selective killing of HCC cells using liver-specific promoter and tumor specific enhancer (Su et al., 1996) HSV-TK Suicide gene therapy Mouse model Reduction of tumor growth and observation of by stander effect (Su et al., 1997) HSV-TK Suicide gene therapy HCC cell lines/ mouse model Use of a liver specific promoter combined with posttranscriptional regulation to achieve HCC-specific HSV-tk expression; reduction in tumor growth and low toxicity (Della Peruta et al., 2015) p53 ...

Combined Transductional Untargeting/Retargeting and Transcriptional Restriction Enhances Adenovirus Gene Targeting and Therapy for Hepatic Colorectal Cancer Tumors

Cancer Research

... Cell segmentation can be categorised into two classes, i.e. nucleic segmentation and cytoplasm (or whole cell) segmentation. In recent years, there has been significant effort towards the development of automated methods for cell nuclei image and 3D cell segmentation have been developed (Ortiz de Solorzano et al., 1999; Sarti et al., 2000; De Solorzano et al., 2001; Umesh Adiga & Chaudhuri, 2001; Malpica et al., 1997; Belien et al., 2002; Wählby et al., 2004; Lin et al., 2005; Lindblad et al., 2004; Dufour et al., 2005; Li et al., 2007 Li et al., , 2008 Dorn et al., 2008; Ko et al., 2009). The main methods for cell segmentation can be classified as: threshold-based segmentation, edge-based segmentation, region-based segmentation, and deformable models (reviewed in Rohr et al., 2010). ...

A microfluidic platform for sequential ligand labeling and cell binding analysis
  • Citing Article
  • July 2007

Biomedical Microdevices

... These vectors demonstrated the high transduction efficiency of dendritic cells [32]. In another study, a complex was formed between the same CAR capsid protein and a single-chain antibody against human carcinoembryonic antigen, targeting AdVs to colorectal cancer metastases in the liver [33]. It is worth noting that the above studies were conducted in vivo. ...

Adenovirus Tumor Targeting and Hepatic Untargeting by a Coxsackie/Adenovirus Receptor Ectodomain Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Bispecific Adapter

Cancer Research