Holly Jean Buck’s research while affiliated with University at Buffalo, State University of New York and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (42)


How to address solar geoengineering’s transparency problem
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2025

·

17 Reads

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

·

Holly Jean Buck

·

Download




The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024 - 2nd Edition

June 2024

·

252 Reads

·

42 Citations

The State of CDR reports are intended to regularly inform researchers, policymakers and practitioners on the state of progress, by systematically collecting and analysing the vast amount of data and developments in many parts of the world. The second edition continues the assessment of CDR development, expanding geographical coverage and including new topics such as voluntary markets and monitoring, reporting and verification. Starting with Edition 2, authors of the report have compiled data on a number of Key Indicators of the State of CDR. These indicators showcase the current state of play, direction of travel, and benchmarks for future CDR needs consistent with sustainably limiting temperature increase in line with the Paris Agreement. The data behind these indicators will be freely available via the newly developed State of CDR data portal. The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal Edition 2 identified a subset of scenarios that can be considered “more sustainable”. Across this group of scenarios, the central range of CDR deployment is 7 to 9 GtCO₂ per year in 2050. Around 2 GtCO₂ per year of CDR is taking place already. Almost all of this comes from conventional CDR methods. Novel CDR methods contribute 1.3 million tons (0.0013 Gt) of CO₂ removal per year. That is less than 0.1% of total CDR, but novel methods are growing more rapidly than conventional methods.


Toward an evidence‐informed, responsible, and inclusive debate on solar geoengineering: A response to the proposed non‐use agreement

May 2024

·

33 Reads

·

8 Citations

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate Change

A prominent recent perspective article in this journal and accompanying open letter propose a broad international “non‐use agreement” (NUA) on activities related to solar geoengineering (SG). The NUA calls on governments to renounce large‐scale use of SG, and also to refuse to fund SG research, ban outdoor experiments, decline to grant IP rights, and reject discussions of SG in international organizations. We argue that such pre‐emptive rejection of public research and consultation would deprive future policy‐makers of knowledge and capability that would support informed decisions to safely and equitably limit climate risk, sustain human welfare, and protect threatened ecosystems. In contrast to the broad prohibitions of the NUA, we propose an alternative near‐term pathway with five elements: assess SG risks and benefits in the context of related climate risks and responses; distinguish the risks and governance needs of SG research and deployment; pursue research that treats uncertainties and divergent results even‐handedly; harness normalization of SG as a path to effective assessment and governance; and build a more globally inclusive conversation on SG and its governance. These principles would support a more informed, responsible, and inclusive approach to limiting climate risks, including judgments on the potential role or rejection of SG, than the prohibitory approach of the NUA. This article is categorized under: Climate and Development > Social Justice and the Politics of Development Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance Policy and Governance > National Climate Change Policy






Citations (39)


... There are some solar energy studies [18][19][20]. The effects of climate change and SRM incorporated with the renewable energy resources has been studied [21]. Climate intervention methods are compared with carbon dioxide removal [22]. ...

Reference:

Analysis of Solar Radiation Shielding in Space for Climate Mitigations of the Earth
Potential effects of climate change and solar radiation modification on renewable energy resources
  • Citing Article
  • January 2025

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

... Supplementary Table 1 outlines the capture rates assumed for different technologies. In all of the primary scenarios, it is assumed that Canada cannot import biomass, to prevent shifting the negative externalities of logging activities to other countries 67 . This is particularly important given that Canada has abundant domestic biomass resources and acknowledges the distributional dimension of equity. ...

Racial capitalism’s role in mitigation deterrence from carbon removal
  • Citing Article
  • October 2024

Environmental Science & Policy

... To facilitate the increased use of timber in construction, maximise climate benefit, and support the transition to a low-carbon economy, policy strategies should consider implementing incentives and regulations that promote both sustainable forest management and the integration of green building practices. From a policy perspective, it is also critical that CDR strategies do not undermine or postpone efforts to reduce emissions, a concern referred to as climate delay or mitigation deterrence (Markusson et al., 2024). Consequently, it is essential that enhancements in CDR through improved forest management serve to supplement rather than detract from emission reduction initiatives, serving as an additional support to these efforts. ...

Carbon removal and the empirics of climate delay
  • Citing Article
  • September 2024

Environmental Science & Policy

... For this reason, there is a consensus in the CDR scientific community that DACS should not be perceived as an alternative to avoiding and sequestering fossil CO 2 emissions from hard-to-abate industrial sectors [3,[14][15][16][17]. However, it seems clear that CDR and synthetic fuels will become key technologies in the energy transition [6,18]. In this context, DAC is a particularly relevant technology due to its capacity to provide high purity CO 2 for both sequestration and utilization without the biophysical limitations of other technologies [19][20][21]. ...

The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024 - 2nd Edition

... The non-use agreement proposed by Biermann et al (2022) has led to concerns about the agreement violating both types of justice related to SRM. The non-use agreement does not protect the Global South from impending climate damages, while most of the signatories to the non-use agreement are from the Global North, which challenges notions of procedural justice in SRM decision making (Parson et al 2024). ...

Toward an evidence‐informed, responsible, and inclusive debate on solar geoengineering: A response to the proposed non‐use agreement

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate Change

... But if warming continues, even if dramatic cuts in the use of fossil fuels come in the next couple of decades, then the unavoidable conclusion is that some form of SRM to cool things is going to be needed. In tackling this agenda, it might be useful to learn from previous innovations in global governance, where technical and societal concerns are meshed in common initiatives [ 116 ]. ...

Solar geoengineering research in the global public interest: A proposal for how to do it
  • Citing Article
  • December 2023

One Earth

... While previous research has highlighted critical aspects of power sector decarbonization, a critical gap remains-we need to better understand how CDR interacts with and complements efforts to decarbonize electricity generation. The feasibility of achieving the necessary scale of CDR-up to 10 GtCO 2 removal per year by mid-century 27 -faces substantial technical, socio-economic, environmental, and political barriers 28,29 , necessitating a deeper examination of their role in the power sector transformation. While previous research has only begun exploring the connection between CDR deployment and stranded assets in the power sector 30 , our study builds on this prior work in several ways. ...

Controversies of carbon dioxide removal
  • Citing Article
  • November 2023

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

... Second, Hollnaicher (2022) criticizes an overly high discount rate in the IAMs, which leads to an overestimation of CDR [13]. Third, the extent and originating sectors of so-called "residual emissions" that are offset by CDR when countries reach net zero differ significantly in modeled scenario pathways [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Often residual emission estimates are not explicitly defined in long-term national climate strategies, and for those countries that do define them, the level of residual emissions varies widely [16,17]. ...

Net zero and the unexplored politics of residual emissions
  • Citing Article
  • April 2023

Energy Research & Social Science

... In recent years, governments worldwide have announced their net-zero targets. Net-zero emissions imply carbon balancing, and promoting carbon neutrality is a crucial step towards achieving these targets [5,8]. As the problem of global climate change continues to intensify, a social consensus has emerged on the importance of human activities in efforts to reduce carbon emissions. ...

Countries’ long-term climate strategies fail to define residual emissions

Nature Climate Change

... The maximum capacitance that can be attained from pseudocapacitors based on the redox reactions is 5000 F cm À3 , [68] which is much larger than that of the double-layer capacitor (825 F cm À3 ). [92] Pseudocapacitors can also be based on ion intercalation into crystalline material, as described in Equation (5). ...

Why residual emissions matter right now

Nature Climate Change