Heidi H. Liu’s research while affiliated with George Washington University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


“When” Versus “Whether” Gender/Sex Differences: Insights From Psychological Research on Negotiation, Risk-Taking, and Leadership
  • Article

March 2024

·

73 Reads

·

2 Citations

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Hannah R. Bowles

·

Jens Mazei

·

Heidi H. Liu

We present a conceptual framework of situational moderators of gender/sex effects in negotiation, risk-taking, and leadership—three masculine-stereotypic domains associated with gender/sex gaps in pay and authority. We propose that greater situational ambiguity and higher relevance and salience of gender/sex increase the likelihood of gender/sex-linked behaviors in these domains. We argue that greater ambiguity increases the extent to which actors and audiences must search inwardly (e.g., mental schema, past experience) or outwardly (e.g., social norms) for cues on how to behave or evaluate a situation and thereby widens the door for gender/sex-linked influences. Correspondingly, we propose that gender/sex effects on behavior and evaluations in these domains will be more likely when gender/sex is more relevant and salient to the setting or task. We propose further that these two situational moderators may work jointly or interactively to influence the likelihood of gender/sex effects in negotiation, risk-taking, and leadership. We conclude by discussing applications of our conceptual framework to psychological science and its translation to practice, including directions for future research.

Citations (1)


... Such mundane, rude behavior is more common than more extreme harassment (e.g., sexual harassment; Cortina et al., 2001), and can harm employees (see Schilpzand et al., 2016a andCortina et al., 2017 for reviews). There are reasons to suspect that incivility may affect women more than men: Incivility creates a situation where it is unclear what responses and actions are appropriate (Schilpzand et al., 2016a(Schilpzand et al., , 2016b, and gender differences may be more likely to occur in settings with unclear norms, when people rely more on stereotypes to determine appropriateness (Bowles et al., 2024). Additionally, although everyone can experience incivility, and the content of uncivil behavior (e.g. the words being said by the perpetrator) may not be explicitly gendered, incivility targets women more than men (Cortina et al., 2013;Gabriel et al., 2018;Miner et al., 2014;Saxena, 2023). ...

Reference:

Silenced by Incivility
“When” Versus “Whether” Gender/Sex Differences: Insights From Psychological Research on Negotiation, Risk-Taking, and Leadership
  • Citing Article
  • March 2024

Perspectives on Psychological Science