Harry Hoffman’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Table 4 . Concentrations, engine oil contamination
Table 5 . Inhaled doses, engine oil contamination
Aviation and Exposure to Toxic Chemicals
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 1999

·

4,643 Reads

·

2 Citations

SAE Technical Papers

·

Harry Hoffman

·

Chris Winder

The use of jet-fuel, de-icing fluids, lubricants, hydraulics, engine oil and other fluids, are associated with single repeated/accidental or chronic exposure (s) to ground staff, flight-deck and cabin crew and passengers. These fluids can become airborne in vapor or aerosol phases, and are known to contain neurotoxicants, carcinogens, irritants and other toxic ingredients. Exposures (single or repeated) to these toxic materials are not rare events and some typical failures/working conditions include mechanical failures, seal leaks, and operational procedures, such as take off while fumes detected, pack burn outs. A method for calculation of exposure dose is proposed. The additional impact of exposure to toxicants in conditions of lowered pressure (and reduced oxygen level), other potentiation factors are still largely unknown, but are not presumed to be beneficial. These occupational and public exposures can impact on a range of issues, including: air safety; public liability; ground and air crew safety; control requirements on the supply/ handling/use/disposal of these products; and national and international regulations. A number of toxicity studies report a consistent range of symptoms in exposed individuals (Rayman, 1983; Van Netten, 1998). Because flight safety can be compromised, due to significant symptoms such as disorientation, blurred vision, impaired memory, altered coordination and so on, attempts have been made to address these problems worldwide. These include changes in engine design, drainage, containment, retrofitting of engine filters, modified maintenance and operation and procedures and the like. Some of these changes were developed in past decades or are being currently worked-out while new technologies are being developed that enable significant reduction in concentrations of toxic airborne chemicals. However, while the problem persists, exposure of staff and the public to levels of toxicants that may affect safety and health continues. © 1999 by SAE International and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.

Download

Citations (1)


... These threshold values were [22,24,25] cited by Hayes et al. [7] , and this rationale is often used as a reason why some interpret the findings to report that cabin air quality is not responsible for the adverse effects reported by aircrew. However, Watterson and Michaelis reported that these threshold values are not an appropriate way to establish risk for aircrew [26] . The UK EH40/2005 workplace exposure limits indicate that "WELs are approved only for use where the atmospheric pressure is between 900 and 1,100 millibars", which is not the case in aircraft cabin air. ...

Reference:

Using the grey literature to better understand the potential health impacts of cabin air quality
Aviation and Exposure to Toxic Chemicals

SAE Technical Papers