Håkon Robbestad Gylterud’s research while affiliated with University of Bergen and other places

When working in homotopy type theory and univalent foundations, the traditional role of the category of sets, $\mathcal{Set}$, is replaced by the category $\mathcal{hSet}$ of homotopy sets (h-sets); types with h-propositional identity types. Many of the properties of $\mathcal{Set}$ hold for $\mathcal{hSet}$ ((co)completeness, exactness, local cartesian closure, etc.). Notably, however, the univalence axiom implies that $\mathsf{Ob}\,\mathcal{hSet}$ is not itself an h-set, but an h-groupoid. This is expected in univalent foundations, but it is sometimes useful to also have a stricter universe of sets, for example, when constructing internal models of type theory. In this work, we equip the type of iterative sets $\mathsf{V}^0$, due to Gylterud ((2018). The Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (3) 1132–1146) as a refinement of the pioneering work of Aczel ((1978). Logic Colloquium’77, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 96, Elsevier, 55–66.) on universes of sets in type theory, with the structure of a Tarski universe and show that it satisfies many of the good properties of h-sets. In particular, we organize $\mathsf{V}^0$ into a (non-univalent strict) category and prove that it is locally cartesian closed. This enables us to organize it into a category with families with the structure necessary to model extensional type theory internally in HoTT/UF. We do this in a rather minimal univalent type theory with W-types, in particular we do not rely on any HITs, or other complex extensions of type theory. Furthermore, the construction of $\mathsf{V}^0$ and the model is fully constructive and predicative, while still being very convenient to work with as the decoding from $\mathsf{V}^0$ into h-sets commutes definitionally for all type constructors. Almost all of the paper has been formalized in $\texttt{Agda}$ using the $\texttt{agda}$-$\texttt{unimath}$ library of univalent mathematics.

In this paper, we present a constructive and proof-relevant development of graph theory, including the notion of maps, their faces and maps of graphs embedded in the sphere, in homotopy type theory (HoTT). This allows us to provide an elementary characterisation of planarity for locally directed finite and connected multigraphs that takes inspiration from topological graph theory, particularly from combinatorial embeddings of graphs into surfaces. A graph is planar if it has a map and an outer face with which any walk in the embedded graph is walk-homotopic to another. A result is that this type of planar maps forms a homotopy set for a graph. As a way to construct examples of planar graphs inductively, extensions of planar maps are introduced. We formalise the essential parts of this work in the proof assistant Agda with support for HoTT.

In this paper, we present a constructive and proof-relevant development of graph theory, including the notion of maps, their faces, and maps of graphs embedded in the sphere, in homotopy type theory. This allows us to provide an elementary characterisation of planarity for locally directed finite and connected multigraphs that takes inspiration from topological graph theory, particularly from combinatorial embeddings of graphs into surfaces. A graph is planar if it has a map and an outer face with which any walk in the embedded graph is walk-homotopic to another. A result is that this type of planar maps forms a homotopy set for a graph. As a way to construct examples of planar graphs inductively, extensions of planar maps are introduced. We formalise the essential parts of this work in the proof-assistant Agda with support for homotopy type theory.

We show how the display-map category of finite (symmetric) simplicial complexes can be seen as representing the totality of database schemas and instances in a single mathematical structure. We give a sound interpretation of a certain dependent type theory in this model and show how it allows for the syntactic specification of schemas and instances and the manipulation of the same with the usual type-theoretic operations.

We construct a model of constructive set theory with Aczel's anti-foundation axiom (AFA) in homotopy type theory. Like the previous such model (Lindstr\"om 1989), we use M-types, but rather than forming a setoid, we identify a subtype where the identity type is the correct notion of equality. We show that this model sits at the bottom of a hiearchy of non-wellfounded \in-structures of each h-level, and establish a duality with a hiearchy of well-founded \in-structures -- and in particular the model of set theory constructed in the book Homotopy Type Theory.

We give a model of set theory based on multisets in homotopy type theory. The equality of the model is the identity type. The underlying type of iterative sets can be formulated in Martin-Löf type theory, without Higher Inductive Types (HITs), and is a sub-type of the underlying type of Aczel’s 1978 model of set theory in type theory. The Voevodsky Univalence Axiom and mere set quotients (a mild kind of HITs) are used to prove the axioms of constructive set theory for the model. We give an equivalence to the model provided in Chapter 10 of “Homotopy Type Theory” by the Univalent Foundations Program.

We give a model of set theory based on multisets in homotopy type theory. The equality of the model is the identity type. The underlying type of iterative sets can be formulated in Martin-L\"of type theory, without Higher Inductive Types (HITs), and is a sub-type of the underlying type of Aczel's 1978 model of set theory in type theory. The Voevodsky Univalence Axiom and mere set quotients (a mild kind of HITs) are used to prove the axioms of constructive set theory for the model. We give an equivalence to the model provided in Chapter 10 of "Homotopy Type Theory" by the Univalent Foundations Program.

A multiset consists of elements, but the notion of a multiset is distinguished from that of a set by carrying information of how many times each element occurs in a given multiset. In this work we will investigate the notion of iterative multisets, where multisets are iteratively built up from other multisets, in the context Martin–Löf Type Theory, in the presence of Voevodsky’s Univalence Axiom. In his 1978 paper, “the type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory” Aczel introduced a model of constructive set theory in type theory, using a W-type quantifying over a universe, and an inductively defined equivalence relation on it. Our investigation takes this W-type and instead considers the identity type on it, which can be computed from the univalence axiom. Our thesis is that this gives a model of multisets. In order to demonstrate this, we adapt axioms of constructive set theory to multisets, and show that they hold for our model.

A multiset consists of elements, but the notion of a multiset is distinguished from that of a set by carrying information of how many times each element occurs in a given multiset. In this work we will investigate the notion of iterative multisets, where multisets are iteratively built up from other multisets, in the context Martin-L\"of Type Theory, in the presence of Voevodsky's Univalence Axiom. Aczel 1978 introduced a model of constructive set theory in type theory, using a W-type quantifying over a universe, and an inductively defined equivalence relation on it. Our investigation takes this W-type and instead considers the identity type on it, which can be computed from the Univalence Axiom. Our thesis is that this gives a model of multisets. In order to demonstrate this, we adapt axioms of constructive set theory to multisets, and show that they hold for our model.