Haiyan Luo’s research while affiliated with Xiamen University and other places

Electrolyte engineering is crucial for improving cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) to enhance the performance of lithium‐ion batteries, especially at high charging cut‐off voltages. However, typical electrolyte modification strategies always focus on the solvation structure in the bulk region, but consistently neglect the dynamic evolution of electrolyte solvation configuration at the cathode‐electrolyte interface, which directly influences the CEI construction. Herein, we reveal an anti‐synergy effect between Li⁺‐solvation and interfacial electric field by visualizing the dynamic evolution of electrolyte solvation configuration at the cathode‐electrolyte interface, which determines the concentration of interfacial solvated‐Li⁺. The Li⁺ solvation in the charging process facilitates the construction of a concentrated (Li⁺‐solvent/anion‐rich) interface and anion‐derived CEI, while the repulsive force derived from interfacial electric field induces the formation of a diluted (solvent‐rich) interface and solvent‐derived CEI. Modifying the electrochemical protocols and electrolyte formulation, we regulate the “inflection voltage” arising from the anti‐synergy effect and prolong the lifetime of the concentrated interface, which further improves the functionality of CEI architecture.

More and more basic practical application scenarios have been gradually ignored/disregarded, in fundamental research on rechargeable batteries, e.g. assessing cycle life under various depths‐of‐discharge (DODs). Herein, although benefit from the additional energy density introduced by anionic redox, we critically revealed that lithium‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes present anomalously poor capacity retention at low‐DOD cycling, which is essentially different from typical layered cathodes (e.g. NCM), and pose a formidable impediment to the practical application of LRLO. We systemically demonstrated that DOD‐dependent capacity decay is induced by the anionic redox and accumulation of oxidized lattice oxygen (Oⁿ⁻). Upon low‐DOD cycling, the accumulation of Oⁿ⁻ and the persistent presence of vacancies in the transition metal (TM) layer intensified the in‐plane migration of TM, exacerbating the expansion of vacancy clusters, which further facilitated detrimental out‐of‐plane TM migration. As a result, the aggravated structural degradation of LRLO at low‐DOD impeded reversible Li⁺ intercalation, resulting in rapid capacity decay. Furthermore, prolonged accumulation of Oⁿ⁻ persistently corroded the electrode‐electrolyte interface, especially negative for pouch‐type full‐cells with the shuttle effect. Once the “double‐edged sword” effect of anionic redox being elucidated under practical condition, corresponding modification strategies/routes would become distinct for accelerating the practical application of LRLO.

More and more basic practical application scenarios have been gradually ignored/disregarded, in fundamental research on rechargeable batteries, e.g. assessing cycle life under various depths‐of‐discharge (DODs). Herein, although benefit from the additional energy density introduced by anionic redox, we critically revealed that lithium‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes present anomalously poor capacity retention at low‐DOD cycling, which is essentially different from typical layered cathodes (e.g. NCM), and pose a formidable impediment to the practical application of LRLO. We systemically demonstrated that DOD‐dependent capacity decay is induced by the anionic redox and accumulation of oxidized lattice oxygen (On‐). Upon low‐DOD cycling, the accumulation of On‐ and the persistent presence of vacancies in the transition metal (TM) layer intensified the in‐plane migration of TM, exacerbating the expansion of vacancy clusters, which further facilitated detrimental out‐of‐plane TM migration. As a result, the aggravated structural degradation of LRLO at low‐DOD impeded reversible Li+ intercalation, resulting in rapid capacity decay. Furthermore, prolonged accumulation of On‐ persistently corroded the electrode‐electrolyte interface, especially negative for pouch‐type full‐cells with the shuttle effect. Once the “double‐edged sword” effect of anionic redox being elucidated under practical condition, corresponding modification strategies/routes would become distinct for accelerating the practical application of LRLO.

In addressing the global climate crisis, the energy storage performance of Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) under extreme conditions, particularly for high‐energy‐density Li‐rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathode, is of the essence. Despite numerous researches into the mechanisms and optimization of LRLO cathodes under ideal moderate environment, there is a dearth of case studies on their practical/harsh working environments (e.g., pouch‐type full‐cell, high‐temperature storage), which is a critical aspect for the safety and commercial application. In this study, using pouch‐type full‐cells as prototype investigation target, the study finds the cell assembled with LRLO cathode present severer voltage decay than typical NCM layered cathode after high‐temperature storage. Further decoupling elucidates the primary failure mechanism is the over‐activation of lattice oxidized oxygen (aggravate by high‐temperature storage) and subsequent escape of oxidized oxygen species (Oⁿ⁻), which disrupts transition metal (TM) coordination and exacerbates electrolyte decomposition, leading to severe TM dissolution, interfacial film reconstruction, and harmful shuttle effects. These chain behaviors upon high‐temperature storage significantly influence the stability of both electrodes, causing substantial voltage decay and lithium loss, which accelerates full‐cell failure. Although the anionic redox reaction can bring additional energy, but the escape of metastable Oⁿ⁻ species would introduce new concerns in practical cell working conditions.

Anode‐free sodium metal batteries (AFSMBs) are regarded as the “ceiling” for current sodium‐based batteries. However, their practical application is hindered by the unstable electrolyte and interfacial chemistry at the high‐voltage cathode and anode‐free side, especially under extreme temperature conditions. Here, an advanced electrolyte design strategy based on electrolyte solvation engineering is presented, which shapes a weakly solvating anion‐stabilized (WSAS) electrolyte by balancing the interaction between the Na⁺‐solvent and Na⁺‐anion. The special interaction constructs rich contact ion pairs (CIPs) /aggregates (AGGs) clusters at the electrode/electrolyte interface during the dynamic solvation process which facilitates the formation of a uniform and stable interfacial layer, enabling highly stable cycling of 4.0 V‐class layered oxide cathode from −40 °C to 60 °C and excellent reversibility of Na plating/stripping with an ultrahigh average CE of 99.89%. Ultimately, industrial multi‐layer anode‐free pouch cells using the WSAS electrolyte achieve 80% capacity remaining after 50 cycles and even deliver 74.3% capacity at −30 °C. This work takes a pivotal step for the further development of high‐energy‐density Na batteries.

Electrolyte engineering is crucial for improving cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) to enhance the performance of lithium‐ion batteries, especially at high charging cut‐off voltages. However, typical electrolyte modification strategies always focus on the solvation structure in the bulk region, but consistently neglect the dynamic evolution of electrolyte solvation configuration at the cathode‐electrolyte interface, which directly influences the CEI construction. Herein, we reveal an anti‐synergy effect between Li+‐solvation and interfacial electric field by visualizing the dynamic evolution of electrolyte solvation configuration at the cathode‐electrolyte interface, which determines the concentration of interfacial solvated‐Li+. The Li+ solvation in the charging process facilitates the construction of a concentrated (Li+‐solvent/anion‐rich) interface and anion‐derived CEI, while the repulsive force derived from interfacial electric field induces the formation of a diluted (solvent‐rich) interface and solvent‐derived CEI. Modifying the electrochemical protocols and electrolyte formulation, we regulate the “inflection voltage” arising from the anti‐synergy effect and prolong the lifetime of the concentrated interface, which further improves the functionality of CEI architecture.

Compensating for the irreversible loss of limited active sodium (Na) is crucial for enhancing the energy density of practical sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) full‐cell, especially when employing hard carbon anode with initially lower coulombic efficiency. Introducing sacrificial cathode presodiation agents, particularly those that own potential anionic oxidation activity with a high theoretical capacity, can provide additional sodium sources for compensating Na loss. Herein, Ni atoms are precisely implanted at the Na sites within Na2O framework, obtaining a (Na0.89Ni0.05□0.06)2O (Ni–Na2O) presodiation agent. The synergistic interaction between Na vacancies and Ni catalyst effectively tunes the band structure, forming moderate Ni–O covalent bonds, activating the oxidation activity of oxygen anion, reducing the decomposition overpotential to 2.8 V (vs Na/Na⁺), and achieving a high presodiation capacity of 710 mAh/g≈Na2O (Na2O decomposition rate >80%). Incorporating currently‐modified presodiation agent with Na3V2(PO4)3 and Na2/3Ni2/3Mn1/3O2 cathodes, the energy density of corresponding Na‐ion full‐cells presents an essential improvement of 23.9% and 19.3%, respectively. Further, not limited to Ni–Na2O, the structure–function relationship between the anionic oxidation mechanism and electrode–electrolyte interface fabrication is revealed as a paradigm for the development of sacrificial cathode presodiation agent.

Acting as a passive protective layer, solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI) plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability of the Li‐metal anode. Derived from the reductive decomposition of electrolytes (e.g., anion and solvent), the SEI construction presents as an interfacial process accompanied by the dynamic de‐solvation process during Li‐metal plating. However, typical electrolyte engineering and related SEI modification strategies always ignore the dynamic evolution of electrolyte configuration at the Li/electrolyte interface, which essentially determines the SEI architecture. Herein, by employing advanced electrochemical in situ FT‐IR and MRI technologies, we directly visualize the dynamic variations of solvation environments involving Li⁺‐solvent/anion. Remarkably, a weakened Li⁺‐solvent interaction and anion‐lean interfacial electrolyte configuration have been synchronously revealed, which is difficult for the fabrication of anion‐derived SEI layer. Moreover, as a simple electrochemical regulation strategy, pulse protocol was introduced to effectively restore the interfacial anion concentration, resulting in an enhanced LiF‐rich SEI layer and improved Li‐metal plating/stripping reversibility.

Acting as a passive protective layer, solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI) plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability of the Li‐metal anode. Derived from the reductive decomposition of electrolytes (e.g., anion and solvent), the SEI construction presents as an interfacial process accompanied by the dynamic de‐solvation process during Li‐metal plating. However, typical electrolyte engineering and related SEI modification strategies always ignore the dynamic evolution of electrolyte configuration at the Li/electrolyte interface, which essentially determines the SEI architecture. Herein, by employing advanced electrochemical in‐situ FT‐IR and MRI technologies, we directly visualize the dynamic variations of solvation environments involving Li+‐solvent/anion. Remarkably, a weakened Li+‐solvent interaction and anion‐lean interfacial electrolyte configuration have been synchronously revealed, which is difficult for the fabrication of anion‐derived SEI layer. Moreover, as a simple electrochemical regulation strategy, pulse protocol was introduced to effectively restore the interfacial anion concentration, resulting in an enhanced LiF‐rich SEI layer and improved Li‐metal plating/stripping reversibility.