November 2024
·
94 Reads
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Flight controllers play vital role in stability, performance and control operations of a drone throughout the flight. Inappropriate flight controller selection can jeopardize both the drone and its payload, making it imperative to address the meticulous choice of drone flight controllers for specific applications. This work delves into the behavior of various flight controllers when tested in a quadcopter configuration under consistent structural and environmental conditions. The research not only examines the selection of flight controllers but also explores the challenges faced by amateur drone operators during setup and flight, offering practical techniques to overcome them. Among the various array of flight controllers available in the market, namely KK2.1.5, QQ super thunder, APM, DJI NAZA Mlite, and Pixhawk, have been used in this experiment. Comprehensive experiments were conducted using identical drone configurations to elucidate the precise difficulties associated with each flight controller. The results revealed instances of suboptimal stability, communication issues, and troubleshooting errors for certain controllers. Notably, KK2.1.5 and QQ super thunder exhibited non-responsiveness when utilized in hexacopters and octacopters. Ultimately, this research underscores the NAZA flight controller’s suitability for novice pilots among the tested options. The insights presented herein serve as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to select the most appropriate flight controller based on their piloting proficiency and for resolving challenges encountered during drone operations.