Gregory Burnett's research while affiliated with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and other places

... En las búsquedas realizadas derivadas de un proceso de curaduría de contenidos educativos digitales en educación para la salud (Broussard, Radkins, & Compton, 2014;Burnett, Wischgoll, Finomore, & Calvo, 2013;Hughes et al., 2014;Rosas, Trujillo, Camacho, Madrigal, & Bradman, 2014;Vollum, 2014), se presentaron dificultades para encontrar y acceder a contenidos educativos en Atención Primaria en Salud (APS) que sean pensados, diseñados y elaborados por las comunidades. En las investigaciones citadas, se observa un enfoque educativo transmisionista (Diego, Fenández, & Badanta, 2017;Gubert et al., 2009) en donde el uso de las TIC está orientado a entregar información más no a desarrollar procesos reflexivos críticos. ...

... In addition, not all that provide this information used the same method. Previously used and reported techniques include (1) the method of bracketing, where participants over and under estimate a series of stimuli levels in order to " zero in " on equality (Galinsky et al. 1990; Stevens, 1959), (2) successively matching various stimuli (Brill et al. 2007Brill et al. , 2008), and (3) a simple match between two or more modalities (Bond & Stevens, 1969; Garcia et al. 2012). In many cases, however, these methods rely on unidirectional matches (e.g., from one modality to another, but not in reverse), and/or perform the task only once per modality pair. ...

... Among the studies that do mention crossmodal matching, the studies either: a) provide little or no information on how matching was conducted or b) if it is reported, there is no consensus on how crossmodal matching should be conducted. For example, two studies incorporated visual, auditory, and tactile cues but asked participants to match audition to touch only (Calvo, Finomore, Burnett, & McNitt, 2013;Calvo, Finomore, McNitt, & Burnett, 2014) whereas another study had participants match audition and touch to vision (Brill, Gilson, & Mouloua, 2007). ...

... Among the studies that do mention crossmodal matching, the studies either: a) provide little or no information on how matching was conducted or b) if it is reported, there is no consensus on how crossmodal matching should be conducted. For example, two studies incorporated visual, auditory, and tactile cues but asked participants to match audition to touch only (Calvo, Finomore, Burnett, & McNitt, 2013;Calvo, Finomore, McNitt, & Burnett, 2014) whereas another study had participants match audition and touch to vision (Brill, Gilson, & Mouloua, 2007). ...

... However, the authors conclude that any of the proposed conditions may be used for pointing and are advantageous due to the fact that the user does not have to hold a device in order to use the accelerometer method. Calvo et al. (2012) developed a pointing device called the G3, which is designed to be used by United States Air Force dismounted soldiers. The G3 consists of a tactical glove that has a gyroscopic sensor, two buttons, and a microcontroller attached to the index finger, the side of the index finger and the back of the glove, respectively. ...

... A division can also be made between local mobility aids (environmental imagers or obstacle detectors, with visual or ranging sensors) that present only the nearest surroundings to the blind traveler and navigation aids (usually GPS-or beacon-based) that provide information on path waypoints [12] or geographical points of interest [13]. While the latter group focuses on directions towards the next waypoint, meaning that a limited spatial sound rendering could be used (e.g., just presenting sounds in the horizontal plane) [14], the former group primarily provides information on obstacles (or the lack of them) and near scene layouts (e.g., walls and shorelines), supporting an accurate spatial representation of the scene [6]. ...