Glen A. Lichtwark’s research while affiliated with Queensland University of Technology and other places

Advanced footwear technologies contain thicker, lightweight, and more resilient midsoles and are associated with improved running economy (RE) compared with traditional footwear. This effect is highly variable with some individuals gaining a greater RE benefit, indicating that biomechanics plays a mediating role with respect to the total effect. Indeed, the energy generated by contractile elements and the elastic energy recovered from stretched tendons and ligaments in the legs and feet are likely to change with footwear. Therefore, if RE is to be maximized according to individual characteristics, an individualized approach to footwear selection is required. However, current theoretical frameworks hinder this approach. Here, we introduce a framework that describes causal relationships between footwear properties, biomechanics, and RE. The framework proposes that RE changes with footwear due to (1) a direct effect of footwear properties—for example, increased or decreased energy return—and (2) a mediating effect of footwear on ankle and foot biomechanics and the spring-mass system. By describing the total effect as 2 complementary pathways, the framework facilitates research that aims to separately quantify direct and mediating effects of footwear. This may permit the development of footwear materials that can separately target the direct and individual mediating effects.

Work- and collision-based models of locomotion are often used to describe the relationship between the mechanical work requirements of the body and metabolic energy expenditure. While work- and collision-based models do a reasonable job of relating mechanical work to metabolic cost at a system level, these models may not map to the underlying force and work demands of muscle, which directly affects energy expenditure. We collected motion capture, force, electromyography and ultrasound data from the main power producing muscles during uphill and downhill walking between +/- 15% grade. These data were used to evaluate a musculoskeletal modelling approach to simulate muscle force- and work-related costs that could be compared to metabolic power that we measured using indirect calorimetry. Muscle force-related costs (activation heat rate + maintenance heat rate) increased at steeper up- and down-hill grades and were moderately correlated with mean joint moments. Muscle work-related costs (mechanical work rate + shortening / lengthening heat rate) increased as grade became more positive and were strongly correlated with net joint work. Compared to traditional models, the inclusion of a term to account for muscle force-related costs should lead to a more explanatory cost model that maps directly to the mechanical demands of muscle.

Accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) involves higher load applied during the eccentric phase of a stretch-shortening cycle movement, followed by a sudden removal of load before the concentric phase. Previous studies suggest that AEL enhances human countermovement jump performance, however the mechanism is not fully understood. Here we explore whether isolating additional load during the countermovement is sufficient to increase ground reaction force, and hence elastic energy stored, at the start of the upward movement and whether this leads to increased jump height or power generation. We conducted a trunk-constrained vertical jump test on a custom-built device to isolate the effect of additional load while controlling for effects of squat depth, arm swing, and coordination. Twelve healthy, recreationally active adults (7 males, 5 females) performed maximal jumps without AEL, followed by randomised AEL conditions prescribed as a percentage of body mass (10%, 20%, and 30%), before repeating jumps without AEL. No significant changes in vertical ground reaction force at the turning point were observed. High load AEL conditions (20% and 30% body weight) led to slight reductions in jump height, primarily due to decreased hip joint and centre of mass work. AEL conditions did not alter peak or integrated activation levels of the knee extensor muscles. The constrained movement task used here, which excluded potential contributions of trunk motion, arm swing, rate of descent, squat depth, and point of load application, allows the conclusion that increased elastic energy return is not the primary mechanism for potentiating effects of AEL on jump performance.

Owing to the unexplored potential to harness knee extension power during jumping, the current study aimed to examine how joint mechanics were altered with a biologically inspired, passive bi-articular ankle–knee exoskeleton, which could potentially facilitate greater jump height by increasing work production about the knee and ankle. Twenty-five participants (16 males and 9 females, 175.2 ± 8.2 cm, 72.9 ± 10.3 kg, 24.0 ± 3.4 years) performed maximal squat jumping with and without the exoskeletal device and we compared jump height, joint moment and joint work of the lower limbs. Despite a low exoskeleton stiffness and therefore a limited capacity to store energy, the bi-articular device resulted in decreased jump height (1.9 ± 3.1 cm, p = 0.006), decreased net work about the knee (0.23 J/kg, p < 0.001) and no increase in ankle joint work (p = 0.207), compared with jumping with no exoskeleton. Based on our findings, to mimic unassisted ankle joint moment profiles, a future bi-articular device would need increased elastic element slack length, greater stiffness and a larger moment arm about the ankle. Future designs could also employ attachment sites that have minimal overlying soft tissue, such as the pelvis, to improve comfort of the device.

Unlike walking and running, people do not consistently choose cadences that minimize energy consumption when cycling. Assuming a common objective function for all forms of locomotion, this suggests either that the neural control system relies on indirect sensorimotor cues to energetic cost that are approximately accurate during walking but not cycling, or that an alternative objective function applies that correlates with energy expenditure in walking but not cycling. This study compared how objective functions derived as proxies to 1) energy cost or 2) an avoidance of muscle fatigue predicted self-selected cycling cadences (SSC) at different saddle heights. Saddle height systematically affected SSC, with lower saddles increasing SSC and higher saddles decreasing SSC. Both fatigue-avoidance and energy-expenditure cost functions derived from muscle activation measurements showed minima that closely approximated the SSCs. By contrast, metabolic power derived from VO2 uptake was minimal at cadences well below the SSC across all saddle height variations. The mismatch between the cadence versus muscle activation and the cadence versus metabolic energy relations is likely due to additional energy costs associated with performing mechanical work at higher cadences. The results suggest that the nervous system places greater emphasis on muscle activation than on energy consumption for action selections in cycling.

Hopping kangaroos exhibit remarkably little change in their rate of metabolic energy expenditure with locomotor speed compared to other running animals. This phenomenon may be related to greater elastic energy savings due to increasing tendon stress; however, the mechanisms which enable the rise in stress remain poorly understood. In this study, we created a three-dimensional (3D) kangaroo musculoskeletal model, integrating 3D motion capture and force plate data, to analyse the kinematics and kinetics of hopping red and grey kangaroos. Using our model, we evaluated how body mass and speed influence (i) hindlimb posture, (ii) effective mechanical advantage (EMA), and (iii) the associated tendon stress in the ankle extensors and (iv) ankle work during hopping. We found that increasing ankle dorsiflexion and metatarsophalangeal plantarflexion likely played an important role in decreasing ankle EMA by altering both the muscle and external moment arms, which subsequently increased energy absorption and peak tendon stress at the ankle. Surprisingly, kangaroo hindlimb posture appeared to contribute to increased tendon stress, thereby elucidating a potential mechanism behind the increase in stress with speed. These posture-mediated increases in elastic energy savings could be a key factor enabling kangaroos to achieve energetic benefits at faster hopping speeds, but may limit the performance of large kangaroos due to the risk of tendon rupture.

Hopping kangaroos exhibit remarkably little change in their rate of metabolic energy expenditure with locomotor speed compared to other running animals. This phenomenon may be related to greater elastic energy savings due to increasing tendon stress; however, the mechanisms which enable the rise in stress remain poorly understood. In this study, we created a three-dimensional (3D) kangaroo musculoskeletal model, integrating 3D motion capture and force plate data, to analyse the kinematics and kinetics of hopping red and grey kangaroos. Using our model, we evaluated how body mass and speed influence (i) hindlimb posture, (ii) effective mechanical advantage (EMA), and (iii) the associated tendon stress in the ankle extensors and (iv) ankle work during hopping. We found that increasing ankle dorsiflexion and metatarsophalangeal plantarflexion likely played an important role in decreasing ankle EMA by altering both the muscle and external moment arms, which subsequently increased energy absorption and peak tendon stress at the ankle. Surprisingly, kangaroo hindlimb posture appeared to contribute to increased tendon stress, thereby elucidating a potential mechanism behind the increase in stress with speed. These posture-mediated increases in elastic energy savings could be a key factor enabling kangaroos to achieve energetic benefits at faster hopping speeds, but may limit the performance of large kangaroos due to the risk of tendon rupture.