Glaucio H. Paulino’s research while affiliated with Princeton University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (405)


Consistent machine learning for topology optimization with microstructure-dependent neural network material models
  • Article

December 2024

·

14 Reads

·

1 Citation

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

·

Jonathan B. Russ

·

Glaucio H. Paulino

·

Miguel A. Bessa

Folding a single high-genus surface into a repertoire of metamaterial functionalities

November 2024

·

158 Reads

·

1 Citation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The concepts of origami and kirigami have often been presented separately. Here, we put forth a synergistic approach—the folded kirigami—in which kirigami assemblies are complemented by means of folding, typical of origami patterns. Besides the emerging patterns themselves, the synergistic approach also leads to topological mechanical metamaterials. While kirigami metamaterials have been fabricated by various methods, such as 3D printing, cutting, casting, and assemblage of building blocks, the “folded kirigami” claim their distinctive properties from the universal folding protocols. For a target kirigami pattern, we design an extended high-genus pattern with appropriate sets of creases and cuts, and proceed to fold it sequentially to yield the cellular structure of a 2D lattice endowed with finite out-of-plane thickness. The strategy combines two features that are generally mutually exclusive in canonical methods: fabrication involving a single piece of material and realization of nearly ideal intercell hinges. We test the approach against a diverse portfolio of triangular and quadrilateral kirigami configurations. We demonstrate a plethora of emerging metamaterial functionalities, including topological phase-switching reconfigurability between polarized and nonpolarized states in kagome kirigami, and availability of nonreciprocal mechanical response in square-rhombus kirigami.


Case#1: domain of possible load cases (F, blue region) and the load basis vectors (Fx\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{x}$$\end{document} and Fy\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{y}$$\end{document}). When ‖Fx‖≠‖Fy‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{x}\Vert \ne \Vert F_{y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a general case, an ellipsoid domain is generated, and when ‖Fx‖=‖Fy‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{x}\Vert = \Vert F_{y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a particular case, a circular domain is generated
Rotation of the basis vectors (Fx\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{x}$$\end{document} and Fy\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{y}$$\end{document}) for any continuous range of admissible angles
Case#2: domain of possible load cases (F, blue region), the load basis vectors (Fx\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{x}$$\end{document} and Fy\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{y}$$\end{document}) for the varying load and the fixed load (Ff\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_f$$\end{document}, red). When ‖Fx‖≠‖Fy‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{x}\Vert \ne \Vert F_{y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a general case, an ellipsoid domain is generated, and when ‖Fx‖=‖Fy‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{x}\Vert = \Vert F_{y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a particular case, a circular domain is generated
Case#3: domain of possible load cases (F1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{1}$$\end{document}, blue region and F2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{2}$$\end{document}, green region) and the load basis vectors (F1x\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{1x}$$\end{document}, F1y\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{1y}$$\end{document}, F2x\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{2x}$$\end{document} and F2y\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_{2y}$$\end{document}). When ‖F1x‖≠‖F1y‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{1x}\Vert \ne \Vert F_{1y}\Vert$$\end{document} or ‖F2x‖≠‖F2y‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{2x}\Vert \ne \Vert F_{2y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a general case, an ellipsoid domain is generated, and when ‖F1x‖=‖F1y‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{1x}\Vert = \Vert F_{1y}\Vert$$\end{document} or ‖F2x‖=‖F2y‖\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Vert F_{2x}\Vert = \Vert F_{2y}\Vert$$\end{document}, as a particular case, a circular domain is generated
Case#4: combination of loads varying independently in magnitude and direction to get a load that varies in three dimensions. a Two independent loads that vary in magnitude and direction in orthogonal planes generate a spherical load surface. b Two independent loads in orthogonal planes, one varies in magnitude and direction, and the other varies just in magnitude, generate a cylindrical load surface. c Three independent loads in orthogonal planes varying in magnitude generate a cubic load surface

+21

Topology optimization with continuously varying load magnitude and direction for compliance minimization
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

October 2024

·

118 Reads

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Traditional topology optimization methods only consider a limited number of loads in the optimization procedure, neglecting load variations common in real-world scenarios. To incorporate real load scenarios, robust topology optimization considers uncertainties in load directions while minimizing compliance, generating structures capable of withstanding variations in the load. This paper incorporates the angles of the load directions as parameters into the optimization formulation to design structures that perform well under a range of load directions. Additionally, the formulation is extended to incorporate local volume constraints to balance the solution distribution throughout a domain, achieving more complex designs with proper material distribution as the angle of the loads and the number of sub-regions increases while maintaining consistency in the worst-case scenario. Two and three-dimensional examples demonstrate that topology-optimized designs are susceptible to loads that vary in direction and magnitude, and by considering realistic loading conditions, this formulation yields robust, reliable designs, markedly enhancing their suitability for actual engineering applications.

View access options

Coarse-Grained Fundamental Forms for Characterizing Isometries of Trapezoid-based Origami Metamaterials

September 2024

·

42 Reads

James McInerney

·

·

Glaucio Paulino

·

[...]

·

Xiaoming Mao

Investigations of origami tessellations as effective media reveal the ability to program the components of their elasticity tensor. However, existing efforts focus on crease patterns that are composed of parallelogram faces where the parallel lines constrain the quasi-static elastic response. In this work, crease patterns composed of more general trapezoid faces are considered and their low-energy linear response is explored. Deformations of such origami tessellations are modeled as linear isometries that do not stretch individual panels at the small scale yet map to non-isometric changes of coarse-grained fundamental forms that quantify how the effective medium strains and curves at the large scale. Two distinct mode shapes, a rigid breathing mode and a nonrigid shearing mode, are identified in the continuum model. A specific example, called Morph-derivative trapezoid-based origami, is presented with analytical expressions for its deformations in both the discrete and continuous models. A developable specimen is fabricated and tested to validate the analytical predictions. This work advances the continuum modeling of origami tessellations as effective media with the incorporation of more generic faces and ground states, thereby enabling the investigation of novel designs and applications.


Consistent machine learning for topology optimization with microstructure-dependent neural network material models

August 2024

·

183 Reads

Additive manufacturing methods together with topology optimization have enabled the creation of multiscale structures with controlled spatially-varying material microstructure. However, topology optimization or inverse design of such structures in the presence of nonlinearities remains a challenge due to the expense of computational homogenization methods and the complexity of differentiably parameterizing the microstructural response. A solution to this challenge lies in machine learning techniques that offer efficient, differentiable mappings between the material response and its microstructural descriptors. This work presents a framework for designing multiscale heterogeneous structures with spatially varying microstructures by merging a homogenization-based topology optimization strategy with a consistent machine learning approach grounded in hyperelasticity theory. We leverage neural architectures that adhere to critical physical principles such as polyconvexity, objectivity, material symmetry, and thermodynamic consistency to supply the framework with a reliable constitutive model that is dependent on material microstructural descriptors. Our findings highlight the potential of integrating consistent machine learning models with density-based topology optimization for enhancing design optimization of heterogeneous hyperelastic structures under finite deformations.


Dynamic Behavior of Origami Structures: Computational and Experimental Study

August 2024

·

106 Reads

Origami structures have been receiving a lot of attention from engineering and scientific researchers owing to their unique properties such as deployability, multi-stability, negative stiffness, etc. However, dynamic properties of origami structures have not been explored much due to a lack of validated analytical dynamic modeling approaches. Given the range of interesting properties and applications of origami structures, it is important to study the dynamic behavior of origami structures. In this study, a dynamic modeling approach for origami structures is presented considering distributed mass modeling, which has the potential to be a generalizable approach. In the proposed approach, stiffness is modeled using the bar and hinge modeling approach while the mass is modeled using the mass distribution approach. Various candidate mass distribution approaches were investigated by comparing their responses to the finite element method responses for various geometric conditions, loading and boundary conditions, and deformation modes. It was observed that a dynamic modeling approach with triangle circumcenter mass distribution was able to capture most of the dynamics satisfactorily consistently. Subsequently, a Miura-ori specimen was manufactured and its free vibration response was determined experimentally and then compared to the prediction of the analytical model. The comparison demonstrated that the analytical model was able to capture most of the dynamics in the longitudinal direction.


A smooth maximum regularization approach for robust topology optimization in the ground structure setting

July 2024

·

36 Reads

·

1 Citation

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

A robust ground structure topology optimization framework is presented to handle the uncertainty of load direction and design for the worst case compliance scenario. The deterministic optimization framework is formulated by a min-max compliance objective to first determine the critical load angle corresponding to the worst case compliance and then to design the topology for compliance minimization. The first optimization problem, based on our load definition, is shown to be equivalent to a maximum eigenvalue function, thus causing significant drawbacks in gradient-based optimization approaches in the case of eigenvalue coalescence. Here, we propose a method to treat the non-differentiability of the maximum eigenvalue optimization problem by a smooth maximum regularization function; hence, presenting a framework for optimizing ground structure networks considering an infinite number of load directions. The results achieved demonstrate that the proposed framework provides solutions with low compliance in all possible loading directions leading to robust structural designs.


Fig. 1. Lepidoptera larva-inspired Kresling soft robot with thermal bimorph actuators. (A) Photograph of a late fifth instar P. zelicaon larva (caterpillar) in a curved configuration with local bending. (B) Body segments of the caterpillar marked from 1 to 7 showing different levels of local contraction and bending. (C) Exploded view of the robot segment composed of electrothermal bimorph actuators integrated with the origami pattern. Insets show the Kresling pattern (Top) and the physical realization (Bottom). Here, LCE denotes liquid crystal elastomer, AgNWs are silver nanowires, PI is polyimide, and PET is polyethylene terephthalate (thermoplastic polymer resin). The symbols H 1 , b, and R denote the height of the deployed Kresling unit, the edge length, and the circumradius of the top octagon plane, respectively. (D) Simulated origami robot including multiple coactive Kresling units mimicking the deformed configuration of the caterpillar. (E) Current applied to the two actuators on each Kresling unit to induce the deformed configuration in (D). (F) Deformed Kresling units with various configurations corresponding to the robot segments. The symbols H 0 , and θ denote the height of the folded Kresling unit and the bending angle between the top and bottom octagon planes, respectively. (G) Top-The stored strain energy of the Kresling origami unit without bimorph actuators of (C) versus bending angle; Middle-strain energy of the origami design without bimorph actuators of (C) versus vertical displacement of any vertices on the top octagon plane; Bottom-strain energy stored in the unit with integrated bimorph actuators of (C) versus vertical displacement. The strain energy (U/AER), and displacements (u/R) are normalized in the numerical simulation based on the bar-and-hinge method. Here, A and E denote the cross-sectional area and Young's modulus of the bar element, respectively. Those numeric labels (within brackets) refer to the seven configurations of the robot segments in (F).
Fig. 4. Bidirectional locomotion of the Kresling soft robot. (A) Schematics of the caterpillars showing the motion. (B) Schematics of the soft robot with sequential activation and deactivation of three active units in between four passive units. (C) Snapshots of the soft robot in one cycle of forward motion followed by a cycle of backward locomotion. (D) Programmed current input of the three Kresling units to trigger bidirectional locomotion of the soft robot. (E) Rigid-body displacement (translation) of the soft robot finishing a cycle of forward crawling followed by a cycle of backward crawling.
Fig. 5. Steering locomotion of the Kresling soft robot. (A and B) Schematics and corresponding photographs of the soft bot showing sequential heating and cooling for steering motion. It consists of three active units, i.e., one for steering and two for driving, as well as four passive units which amplify and facilitate the steering motion. (C) Programmed locomotion of the soft robot following an S-shaped trajectory. (Scale bar, 5 cm.) (D) Photograph of the soft robot moving along a curved tree branch. (Scale bars, 5 cm.) (E) Programmed current input on the two actuators of Kresling unit 2 for the S-shaped locomotion. (F) Cyclic current input on the two driving units 1 and 3 for the S-shaped locomotion. (with a zoomed-in view of three actuation cycles)
Fig. 6. Robotic module design with reprogrammable actuation. (A) Schematics of the robotic module design showing examples of single-unit modules and multiple-unit modules. Note that AP represents a module with 1 active unit and 1 passive unit. (B) Demonstration of an APA module picking up a cargo P module, assembling with a separate PAP module, and enabling steering functionality. The central Inset figure, highlighted with a red contour, indicates that for one of the driving units in ①, its actuation mode is reprogrammed to serve as the steering unit in ⑥ with all modules connected (i.e., PAPAPAP). The other Inset figure, highlighted with a grey contour, illustrates the modular magnetic interconnection during the navigation process.
Modular multi-degree-of-freedom soft origami robots with reprogrammable electrothermal actuation

May 2024

·

180 Reads

·

9 Citations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Soft robots often draw inspiration from nature to navigate different environments. Although the inching motion and crawling motion of caterpillars have been widely studied in the design of soft robots, the steering motion with local bending control remains challenging. To address this challenge, we explore modular origami units which constitute building blocks for mimicking the segmented caterpillar body. Based on this concept, we report a modular soft Kresling origami crawling robot enabled by electrothermal actuation. A compact and lightweight Kresling structure is designed, fabricated, and characterized with integrated thermal bimorph actuators consisting of liquid crystal elastomer and polyimide layers. With the modular design and reprogrammable actuation, a multiunit caterpillar-inspired soft robot composed of both active units and passive units is developed for bidirectional locomotion and steering locomotion with precise curvature control. We demonstrate the modular design of the Kresling origami robot with an active robotic module picking up cargo and assembling with another robotic module to achieve a steering function. The concept of modular soft robots can provide insight into future soft robots that can grow, repair, and enhance functionality.


Axisymmetric blockfold origami: a non-flat-foldable Miura variant with self-locking mechanisms and enhanced stiffness

April 2024

·

86 Reads

·

2 Citations

Origami foldcores, especially the blockfold cores, have emerged as promising components of high-performance sandwich composites. Inspired by the blockfold origami, we propose the axisymmetric blockfold origami (ABO), which is composed of both rectangular and trapezoidal panels. The ABO inherits the non-flat-foldability of the blockfold origami, and furthermore, displays self-locking mechanisms and enhanced stiffness. The geometry and folding kinematics of the ABO are formulated with respect to the geometric parameters and the folding angle of the assembly. The mathematical conditions are derived for the existence of self-locking mechanisms. We perform compression test simulations to demonstrate enhanced stiffness and increased load-bearing capacity. We find that the existence of rectangular panels not only dominates the non-flat-foldability of the ABO, but also contributes to the enhancement of the stiffness. Our results suggest the potential applications of the ABO for building load-bearing structures with rotational symmetry. Moreover, we discuss the prospects of designing tightly assembled multi-layered origami structures with prestress induced by the mismatch of successive layers to enlighten future research.



Citations (73)


... In [4,90], a heuristically motivated convexity condition in the right Cauchy-Green tensor is applied. Furthermore, a variety of parametrized PANN constitutive models has been proposed [19,41,46,50,69,80]. PANN constitutive models were successfully applied to soft biological tissues [53,77] including materials with parametric dependencies [52], rubber-like materials [77], and synthetic homogenisation data of microstructured materials [33,38,50]. ...

Reference:

Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approach
Consistent machine learning for topology optimization with microstructure-dependent neural network material models
  • Citing Article
  • December 2024

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

... Robust optimization is a field that addresses uncertainties within the optimization process [8]. In structural engineering, these uncertainties can pertain to various parameters, such as the direction and magnitude of forces [9] or material properties [10]. There are several methods to achieve robust solutions to optimization problems, including deterministic and stochastic methods [11][12][13]. ...

A smooth maximum regularization approach for robust topology optimization in the ground structure setting

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

... Owing to the low power consumption of such robot design, an untethered version of the multimodal microrobot (32 mm by 37 mm and 6.40 g) is developed, which has both high motion speed (4.78 BL/s) and high relative centripetal acceleration (12.42 BL/s 2 ), exhibiting excellent adaptabilities to complex terrains. Future studies can follow by the integration of various sensing components (41-47) (e.g., temperature/gas/vibration/force sensors), the implementation of artificial intelligence-based autonomous decision-making and environmental recognition, and the incorporation of other locomotion modes to navigate additional domains (e.g., jumping and aquatic-terrestrial microrobots) based on morphable architectures (e.g., bistable actuators and soft actuators based on smart materials) (48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54). Potential applications may include inspection and exploration tasks in confined spaces (e.g., engines) or unstructured environments (e.g., natural terrains), where the microrobots are capable of environmental sensing and feedback information. ...

Modular multi-degree-of-freedom soft origami robots with reprogrammable electrothermal actuation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

... This operation is one instance of the edge-extruding technique [54]. There are some variations of extruded origami patterns [55,56], and the (nonclosed) extruded waterbomb tessellation approximating various surfaces has been already studied [57]; however, how the extrusion changes the kinematics when being applied to tubular origami tessellations was not investigated. In the extruded waterbomb tube, 3 × #(vertices in the tth ring) − #(edges in the tth ring), in which we must count diagonals of the rectangular facets to maintain them flat, becomes 3 × 12N − 42N = −6N < 0. Hence, the extruded waterbomb tube is no longer a Maxwell lattice and becomes an overconstrained framework that generically has no continuous motions; nevertheless, it has 2-DOF. ...

Axisymmetric blockfold origami: a non-flat-foldable Miura variant with self-locking mechanisms and enhanced stiffness

... structure that was initially developed by B. Kreslin while studying the twist buckling of foldable cylinders under torsional buckling [98]. When Kreslin structures undergo twisting or axial displacement, such as deployment or folding, they exhibit non-rigid folding behavior [99]. ...

Kresling origami mechanics explained: Experiments and theory
  • Citing Article
  • March 2024

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

... These restrictions can be overcome through comprehensive multimaterial topology optimization methods, which effectively accommodate various materials and constraints [35,36]. Zhao, Alshannaq [37] experimentally employed this approach within an innovative STM framework, using multi-material topology optimization with varied volume constraints. This framework offers designers the flexibility to modify the location, angles, and dimensions of the ties to meet real-world design requirements. ...

Strut-and-Tie Models Using Multi-Material and Multi-Volume Topology Optimization: Load Path Approach
  • Citing Article
  • November 2023

ACI Structural Journal

... Thore et al (2020) model the problem as a Stackelberg game instead of a zero-sum game and demonstrated that this interpretation ensures the existence of a solution. Recently, Senhora et al (2023) make use of the linear state equations and the bi-linear characteristics of the von Mises stress to derive an analytical solution for the worst-case stress caused by continuously varying loads. ...

Topology optimization with local stress constraints and continuously varying load direction and magnitude: towards practical applications

... Topology optimization has gained attention as a numerical method to find unconventional and nonintuitive structural designs subject to constraints and optimization criteria [18][19][20][21][22]. The topology optimization provides an optimum structural design layout utilizing numerical sensitivities, without engineers' design knowhow or intuition. ...

On topology optimization with gradient-enhanced damage: An alternative formulation based on linear physics
  • Citing Article
  • April 2023

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

... Among the extensive design strategies, the origami and kirigami approach [26,27] opens a new avenue in creating reconfigurable mechanical metamaterials by utilizing the unique folding or cutting patterns for shape morphing and deployment after fabrication. The approach unlocks unique mechanical behaviours via structural reconfiguration or deployment, such as high stretchability [28][29][30][31][32][33], tunable negative Poisson's ratio [34][35][36][37], instabilities and multistabilities [38][39][40][41][42], programmable shape morphing [26,[43][44][45][46], topologically tunable mechanical responses [47] and encoded machine-like intelligence [48][49][50][51][52]. ...

Triclinic Metamaterials by Tristable Origami with Reprogrammable Frustration (Adv. Mater. 43/2022)
  • Citing Article
  • October 2022