Giulia Seghezzo’s research while affiliated with UK Health Security Agency and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (12)


Figure 1-Epidemiological curve showing i) the total number of cases < 18 years of age testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 3rd February
Using the Emergency Care Data Set for the epidemiological surveillance of Children and Young People aged less than 18 years: a case study of COVID-19 in England 2020-2023
  • Preprint
  • File available

July 2024

·

20 Reads

Jacob Boateng

·

Clarissa Oeser

·

Giulia Seghezzo

·

[...]

·

Background: The Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS) provides insight into emergency care activity in England, and combined with COVID-19 surveillance data, can provide new insights into acute COVID-19 infection. Methods: This study identified individuals <18 years old who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February 2020 and March 2023 and attended emergency care 1-14 days after a positive test. The main objective of the study was to explore emergency department (ED) attendance outcomes by demographic characteristics. Results: There were significant differences (p < 0.05) across most of the characteristics of <18s admitted to hospital from emergency departments, and those who were discharged from ED. <18s in IMD decile 1 (14.9%) made up the highest proportion of admissions, with those in less deprived areas having a greater proportion of individuals discharged from ED. February to August 2020 (1.5%) and September 2022 to March 2023 (2.8%) saw the highest proportion of <18 cases attending ED, though the highest number of cases were seen between September 2021 and February 2022. Conclusions: There is great value in the use of ECDS. It facilitates quick, regular insights into the health outcomes of key demographics, and provides a window into the health-seeking behaviours of individuals. Furthermore, outcomes of emergency care attendance can potentially inform assessments of infection severity across multiple demographics during outbreaks and pandemics.

Download

Epicurves of cases and controls for BA.5, BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1.
Crude and adjusted odds ratios for admission or death, relative to BA.5 with 95% confidence intervals of BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1.
Demographic characteristics of cases and controls by Omicron sub-lineage
Risk of severe outcomes among Omicron sub-lineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1 compared to BA.5 in England

October 2023

·

24 Reads

·

2 Citations

Since the emergence of Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2021, a number of sub-lineages have arisen and circulated internationally. Little is known about the relative severity of Omicron sub-lineages BA.2.75, BA.4.6, and BQ.1. We undertook a case–control analysis to determine the clinical severity of these lineages relative to BA.5, using whole genome sequenced, PCR-confirmed infections, between 1 August 2022 and 27 November 2022, among those who presented to emergency care in England 14 days after and up to one day prior to the positive specimen. A total of 10,375 episodes were included in the analysis; of which, 5,207 (50.2%) were admitted to the hospital or died. Multivariable conditional regression analyses found no evidence of greater odds of hospital admission or death among those with BA.2.75 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84–1.09) and BA.4.6 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88– 1.17) or BQ.1 (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94–1.13) compared to BA.5. Future lineages may not follow the same trend and there remains a need for continued surveillance of COVID-19 variants and their clinical outcomes to inform the public health response.



Risk of severe outcomes among Omicron sub-lineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1 compared to BA.5 in England

July 2023

·

36 Reads

·

1 Citation

Since the emergence of Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2021, a number of sub-lineages have arisen and circulated internationally. Little is known about the relative severity of Omicron sub-lineages BA.2.75, BA.4.6 and BQ.1. We undertook a case-control analysis to determine the clinical severity of these lineages relative to BA.5, using whole genome sequenced, PCR-confirmed infections, between 1 August 2022 to 27 November 2022, among those who presented to emergency care in England 14 days after and up to one day prior to the positive specimen. A total of 10,375 episodes were included in the analysis, of which 5,207 (50.2%) were admitted to hospital or died. Multivariable conditional regression analyses found no evidence for greater odds of hospital admission or death among those with BA.2.75 (OR= 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.09), and BA.4.6 (OR= 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.17) or BQ.1 (OR= 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.94 to 1.13) compared to BA.5. Future lineages may not follow the same trend and there remains a need for continued surveillance of COVID-19 variants and their clinical outcomes to inform the public health response.



COVID-19 deaths in children and young people in England, March 2020 to December 2021: An active prospective national surveillance study

November 2022

·

63 Reads

·

19 Citations

Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths are rare in children and young people (CYP). The high rates of asymptomatic and mild infections complicate assessment of cause of death in CYP. We assessed the cause of death in all CYP with a positive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test since the start of the pandemic in England. Methods and findings CYP aged <20 years who died within 100 days of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between 01 March 2020 and 31 December 2021 in England were followed up in detail, using national databases, surveillance questionnaires, post-mortem reports, and clinician interviews. There were 185 deaths during the 22-month follow-up and 81 (43.8%) were due to COVID-19. Compared to non-COVID-19 deaths in CYP with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, death due to COVID-19 was independently associated with older age (aOR 1.06 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.11, p = 0.02) and underlying comorbidities (aOR 2.52 95% CI 1.27 to 5.01, p = 0.008), after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity group, and underlying conditions, with a shorter interval between SARS-CoV-2 testing and death. Half the COVID-19 deaths (41/81, 50.6%) occurred within 7 days of confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 91% (74/81) within 30 days. Of the COVID-19 deaths, 61 (75.3%) had an underlying condition, especially severe neurodisability (n = 27) and immunocompromising conditions (n = 12). Over the 22-month surveillance period, SARS-CoV-2 was responsible for 1.2% (81/6,790) of all deaths in CYP aged <20 years, with an infection fatality rate of 0.70/100,000 SARS-CoV-2 infections in this age group estimated through real-time, nowcasting modelling, and a mortality rate of 0.61/100,000. Limitations include possible under-ascertainment of deaths in CYP who were not tested for SARS-CoV-2 and lack of direct access to clinical data for hospitalised CYP. Conclusions COVID-19 deaths remain extremely rare in CYP, with most fatalities occurring within 30 days of infection and in children with specific underlying conditions.


Time series of BA.1 and BA.2 cases in England, 01 December 2021 to 25 March 2022
Descriptive frequencies of the earliest specimen date of COVID-19 cases with Omicron lineages BA.1 (top panel) and BA.2 (bottom panel), in England between 01 December 2021 and 25 March 2022 (n = 1,243,212). COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019. Shading indicates the method of case identification: validated whole genome sequencing, or genotyping in combination with available S-gene status (SGTF or SGTP) for the episode, or from 24th January onwards S-gene status was used in absence of sequencing or genotyping for the episode.
Relative risk of attendance, admission or death, BA.2 versus BA.1 by age group
Risk of hospitalisation and mortality, overall and by age group, for COVID-19 cases with Omicron lineage BA.2 compared to BA.1 in England, 01 December 2021–2025 March 2022. The central measures are adjusted hazard ratios and the errors bars are the corresponding 95% confidence intervals from Cox regression models stratified for exact specimen date, area of residence, age group and vaccination status, and additionally using regression adjustments for within-age-group residual differences in exact age, sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) quintile and within-IMD-quintile residual differences in exact IMD rank, and reinfection status. A shows risk of any hospital attendance, including admissions, within 14 days of the earliest specimen date in the COVID-19 episode following infection with SARS-CoV-2 lineage BA.2, compared to BA.1. B shows the risk of hospital admission within 14 days. C shows the risk of death within 28 days. For the death outcome, hazard ratios were not estimated for cases aged <20 years due to small numbers. Likelihood ratio test (LRT) P values from two-sided tests for interaction between age group and variant status for attendance, admission, and death are 0.010, 0.0003958, and 0.003 respectively. These explorative tests were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The adjusted hazard ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals that the figure is based on are included in Table S3.
Relative risk of hospital attendance, admission or death, by vaccination status and reinfection status
Risk of hospitalisation and mortality by vaccination status and reinfection status, for COVID-19 cases with Omicron lineage BA.2 compared to BA.1 in England, 01 December 2021–2025 March 2022. The central measures are adjusted hazard ratios and the error bars are the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) from Cox regression models with an interaction term between variant (BA.2 vs BA.1), and vaccination (A total n = 1,243,212; unvaccinated or ≤28 days after vaccination = 247,748; ≥28 days after first dose = 64,694; ≥14 days after second dose = 294,071; ≥14 days after third dose = 537,822) or reinfection (B total n = 1,243,212; reinfection = 125,239; first infection = 1,117,973) status. The models were stratified for exact specimen date, area of residence, age group and vaccination status, and additionally using regression adjustments for within-age-group residual differences in exact age, sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) quintile and within-IMD-quintile residual differences in exact IMD rank, and reinfection status. LRT P values from two-sided tests for interaction between vaccination status and variant status for attendance, admission, and death are 0.65, 0.87, and 0.11 respectively. LRT P values from two-sided tests for interaction between reinfection status and variant status for attendance, admission, and death are 0.34, 0.70, and 0.16, respectively. These explorative tests were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The adjusted hazard ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals that the figure is based on are included in Table S4.
Hospitalisation and mortality risk of SARS-COV-2 variant omicron sub-lineage BA.2 compared to BA.1 in England

October 2022

·

70 Reads

·

28 Citations

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 became the globally dominant variant in early 2022. A sub-lineage of the Omicron variant (BA.2) was identified in England in January 2022. Here, we investigated hospitalisation and mortality risks of COVID-19 cases with the Omicron sub-lineage BA.2 (n = 258,875) compared to BA.1 (n = 984,337) in a large cohort study in England. We estimated the risk of hospital attendance, hospital admission or death using multivariable stratified proportional hazards regression models. After adjustment for confounders, BA.2 cases had lower or similar risks of death (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.90), hospital admission (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83–0.94) and any hospital attendance (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.01). These findings that the risk of severe outcomes following infection with BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 was slightly lower or equivalent to the BA.1 sub-lineage can inform public health strategies in countries where BA.2 is spreading.


Figure 1: Weekly cumulative count of SARS-CoV-2 primary infections eligible for reinfection (allowing for 90 days interval), weekly count or primary infections (multiplied by 10), and weekly count or possible reinfection cases, in children up to age 16 years in England
Figure 2: Weekly rates of SARS-CoV-2 possible reinfection cases per 100 000 population in different age groups in children
Figure 3: Total count of possible SARS-CoV-2 reinfection cases and SARS-CoV-2 primary infection rates by year of age from Jan 27, 2020, to July 31, 2021
Figure 4: Laboratory-confirmed reinfection rates with 95% CIs by age group from Jan 27, 2020, to July 31, 2021
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children: a prospective national surveillance study between January, 2020, and July, 2021, in England

March 2022

·

78 Reads

·

49 Citations

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Background Reinfection after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncommon in adults, but little is known about the risks, characteristics, severity, or outcomes of reinfection in children. We aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in children and compare this with the risk in adults, by analysis of national testing data for England. Methods In our prospective, national surveillance study to assess reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in children in England, we used national SARS-CoV-2 testing data to estimate the risk of reinfection at least 90 days after primary infection from Jan 27, 2020, to July, 31, 2021, which encompassed the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variant waves in England. Data from children up to age 16 years who met the criteria for reinfection were included. Disease severity was assessed by linking reinfection cases to national hospital admission data, intensive care admission, and death registration datasets. Findings Reinfection rates closely followed community infection rates, with a small peak during the alpha wave and a larger peak during the delta wave. In children aged 16 years and younger, 688 418 primary infections and 2343 reinfections were identified. The overall reinfection rate was 66·88 per 100 000 population, which was higher in adults (72·53 per 100 000) than children (21·53 per 100 000). The reinfection rate after primary infection was 0·68% overall, 0·73% in adults compared with 0·18% in children age younger than 5 years, 0·24% in those aged 5–11 years, and 0·49% in those aged 12–16 years. Of the 109 children admitted to hospital with reinfection, 78 (72%) had comorbidities. Hospital admission rates were similar for the first (64 [2·7%] of 2343) and second episode (57 [2·4%] of 2343) and intensive care admissions were rare (seven children for the first episode and four for reinfections). There were 44 deaths within 28 days after primary infection (0·01%) and none after reinfection. Interpretation The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is strongly related to exposure due to community infection rates, especially during the delta variant wave. Children had a lower risk of reinfection than did adults, but reinfections were not associated with more severe disease or fatal outcomes. Funding UK Health Security Agency.


Evaluation of disease severity during SARS-COV-2 reinfection, January 2020 to April 2021, England: an observational study

January 2022

·

51 Reads

·

53 Citations

Journal of Infection

Objective We aimed to look at the burden of disease caused by SARS-COV-2 reinfections and identified potential risk factors for disease severity. Methods We used national surveillance data to collect information on all SARS-CoV-2 primary infection and suspected reinfection cases between January 2020 until early May 2021. Reinfection cases were positive COVID-19 PCR or antigen test, 90 days after their first COVID-19 positive test. We collected information on case demographics, hospital and ICU admission, immunisation status and if individuals were at risk of complication for COVID-19. Results Deaths reported within 28 days of testing positive were 61% (95% confidence interval: 56% to 65%) lower in suspected COVID-19 reinfection than primary infection cases. In the unvaccinated cohort, reinfections were associated with 49% (37% to 58%) lower odds of hospital admission in cases aged 50 to 65 years in the population not identified at risk of complication for COVID-19, and 34% (17% to 48%) in those at risk. ICU admission at reinfection compared to primary infection decreased 76% (55% to 87%). Individuals at risk and those aged below 50 years, who received at least 1 dose of vaccine against COVID-19, were 62% (39% to 74%) and 58% (24% to 77%) less likely to get admitted to hospital at reinfection, respectively. Conclusion Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower odds of dying, and both prior infection and immunisation showed a protective effect against severe disease in selected populations. Older age, sex and underlying comorbidities appeared as principal risk factors for illness severity at reinfection. Funding PHE/UKHSA



Citations (8)


... Overall, in the BA. Figure 4A). This median increase was most manifest in the Spike protein, where the number of SNPs was 28 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] in BA.1 vs. 29 [28][29][30] in BA.2 + BA.4 vs. 30 [29][30][31] in BA.5 + BF vs. 32 [30][31][32][33][34] in BQ + BE + EF vs. 39 [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] in Recombinants p < 0.001 ( Figure 4B). Particularly, in the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), the median [IQR] was 15 [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] in BA.1 vs. 16 [15][16][17] in BA.2 + BA.4 vs. 17 [16][17][18] in BA.5 + BF vs. 20 in BQ + BE + EF vs. 22 [20][21][22][23][24] in Recombinants p < 0.001. ...

Reference:

An In-Depth Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Lineages and Clinical Presentation in Adult Population Distinguished by Immune Status
Risk of severe outcomes among Omicron sub-lineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1 compared to BA.5 in England

... UKHSA also stopped reporting deaths within 28 days of a positive PCR test in July 2023 (23). The UKHSA have assessed the comparability of death registrations with this metric and found that in the second half of 2022 about 40% of deaths within 28 days of a positive test where registered deaths involving COVID-19 and 30% being caused by COVID-19 (24). As with testing, we estimated projections of registered deaths as well as registered deaths within 28 days of a test in November 2023 and provide these results. ...

Comparison of two COVID-19 mortality measures used during the pandemic response in England

International Journal of Epidemiology

... Research suggests that the proportion of deaths within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test which have COVID-19 listed as a factor on the official death certificate declined over as the pandemic progressed into 2022. 27 However, it remains a good proxy for death from COVID-19 where these data are not available. ...

Comparison of Two COVID-19 Mortality Measures Used in the Pandemic Response in England
  • Citing Article
  • January 2023

SSRN Electronic Journal

... Age is considered a primary risk factor for disease severity and COVID-19 mortality, owing to a combination of general frailty and the progressive accumulation of comorbidities [20]. Different SARS-CoV-2 variants have also been closely linked to outcomes, with lower mortality rates for the Omicron compared to the Delta variant [29,36]. ...

Hospitalisation and mortality risk of SARS-COV-2 variant omicron sub-lineage BA.2 compared to BA.1 in England

... 9 During the first year of the pandemic, an estimated 25 children died from covid-19 in the UK (equivalent to two deaths per million), 19 of whom had underlying serious or life limiting health conditions. 7 More recent data from the UK confirm that risk of death from covid-19 remains very low for young people, particularly children aged under 12. 10 Rates of the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (a very rare but serious complication of covid-19) 11 have also decreased in subsequent waves. 12 Worryingly high numbers of infant deaths from covid-19 have been reported recently in low and middle income countries such as Brazil. ...

COVID-19 Deaths in Children and Young People: Active Prospective National Surveillance, March 2020 to December 2021, England
  • Citing Article
  • January 2022

SSRN Electronic Journal

... In a national surveillance study to assess reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in children in England at least 90 days after primary infection from Jan 27, 2020, to July, 31, 2021, the pediatric reinfection rate was reinfection rate was 0.68% and were not associated with more severe disease or fatal outcomes. 46 In Kuwait, during a similar timepoint, re-infections were uncommon, and most children (55.2%) had asymptomatic reinfection. 47 Similarly, in Serbia and Turkey pediatric reinfections were rare and milder. ...

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children: a prospective national surveillance study between January, 2020, and July, 2021, in England

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

... [3][4][5][6][7] Sin embargo, con la aparición de las variantes de Omicron, la frecuencia de reinfecciones por SARS-CoV-2 ha aumentado notablemente, mientras que la gravedad clínica aguda ha disminuido en general. [8][9][10] Este cambio en el panorama pandémico, ha generado incertidumbres con respecto al riesgo de PASC después de la reinfección, particularmente en el contexto de Omicron. ...

Evaluation of disease severity during SARS-COV-2 reinfection, January 2020 to April 2021, England: an observational study

Journal of Infection

... 1,2 Data on the strength and durability of antibodies generated after SARS-CoV-2 infection in children remain limited. 3,4 Such data are c ritic al in understanding disease severity, identifying risk of reinfection, and establishing herd immunity and vaccination policy. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of neutralizing antibodies in a cohort of children and adolescents after SARS-CoV-2 infection. ...

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children: prospective national surveillance, January 2020 to July 2021, England