Giulia Luise’s scientific contributions

Efficient exploration in complex environments remains a major challenge for reinforcement learning (RL). Compared to previous Thompson sampling-inspired mechanisms that enable temporally extended exploration, i.e., deep exploration, we focus on deep exploration in distributional RL. We develop here a general purpose approach, Bag of Policies (BoP), that can be built on top of any return distribution estimator by maintaining a population of its copies. BoP consists of an ensemble of multiple heads that are updated independently. During training, each episode is controlled by only one of the heads and the collected state-action pairs are used to update all heads off-policy, leading to distinct learning signals for each head which diversify learning and behaviour. To test whether optimistic ensemble method can improve on distributional RL as did on scalar RL, by e.g. Bootstrapped DQN, we implement the BoP approach with a population of distributional actor-critics using Bayesian Distributional Policy Gradients (BDPG). The population thus approximates a posterior distribution of return distributions along with a posterior distribution of policies. Another benefit of building upon BDPG is that it allows to analyze global posterior uncertainty along with local curiosity bonus simultaneously for exploration. As BDPG is already an optimistic method, this pairing helps to investigate if optimism is accumulatable in distributional RL. Overall BoP results in greater robustness and speed during learning as demonstrated by our experimental results on ALE Atari games.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is emerging as tool for tackling complex control and decision-making problems. However, in high-risk environments such as healthcare, manufacturing, automotive or aerospace, it is often challenging to bridge the gap between an apparently optimal policy learnt by an agent and its real-world deployment, due to the uncertainties and risk associated with it. Broadly speaking RL agents face two kinds of uncertainty, 1. aleatoric uncertainty, which reflects randomness or noise in the dynamics of the world, and 2. epistemic uncertainty, which reflects the bounded knowledge of the agent due to model limitations and finite amount of information/data the agent has acquired about the world. These two types of uncertainty carry fundamentally different implications for the evaluation of performance and the level of risk or trust. Yet these aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties are generally confounded as standard and even distributional RL is agnostic to this difference. Here we propose how a distributional approach (UA-DQN) can be recast to render uncertainties by decomposing the net effects of each uncertainty. We demonstrate the operation of this method in grid world examples to build intuition and then show a proof of concept application for an RL agent operating as a clinical decision support system in critical care