Gisèle Uwera’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in Future EU Investment-Related Agreements: Is the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order an Obstacle?
  • Article

March 2016

·

136 Reads

·

8 Citations

The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals

Gisèle Uwera

Through the study of the Court’s case law on dispute settlement, this article examines whether investor-State dispute resolution is compatible with EU law at all and, if so, under which conditions. It analyses the relevant Opinions delivered by the Court of Justice regarding external dispute settlement mechanisms and the autonomy of the EU legal order. The author then assesses the compatibility of investor-State dispute resolution within the system of legal protection guaranteed by the CJEU. It finally presents ways forward aiming at preserving the autonomy of the EU legal order. The author concludes that no realistic or viable propositions can be detected on the horizon. Therefore, as long as no veritable mechanism is found to render investor-State dispute resolution in line with the CJEU’s jurisprudence, the insertion of an ISDS mechanism in those international agreements seems to be an ill-considered decision on the part of the European Commission.

Citations (1)


... Hence, it was questionable whether the new ISDS mechanism proposed in the CETA would be able to reach the high threshold which had been set up by the CJEU in a series of opinions. 111 However, the CJEU, in Opinion 1/17, reconsidered its previous jurisprudence on autonomy and, with a new line of argument, placed the EU back into the path of international dispute settlement. 112 With regard to the obvious turnaround, right after the CJEU had delivered Opinion 1/17, several authors wondered why the CJEU had departed from its previous decisions and held that the ICS did not adversely affect the autonomy of the EU legal system. ...

Reference:

Reinterpretation of the Requirements to Preserve the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in Future EU Investment-Related Agreements: Is the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order an Obstacle?
  • Citing Article
  • March 2016

The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals