Giles Hooker’s research while affiliated with University of Pennsylvania and other places

Latent feature representation methods play an important role in the dimension reduction and statistical modeling of high-dimensional complex data objects. However, existing approaches to assess the quality of these methods often rely on aggregated statistics that reflect the central tendency of the distribution of information losses, such as average or total loss, which can mask variation across individual observations. We argue that controlling average performance is insufficient to guarantee that statistical analysis in the latent space reflects the data-generating process and instead advocate for controlling the worst-case generalization error, or a tail quantile of the generalization error distribution. Our framework, CLaRe (Compact near-lossless Latent Representations), introduces a systematic way to balance compactness of the representation with preservation of information when assessing and selecting among latent feature representation methods. To facilitate the application of the CLaRe framework, we have developed GLaRe (Graphical Analysis of Latent Representations), an open-source R package that implements the framework and provides graphical summaries of the full generalization error distribution. We demonstrate the utility of CLaRe through three case studies on high-dimensional datasets from diverse fields of application. We apply the CLaRe framework to select among principal components, wavelets and autoencoder representations for each dataset. The case studies reveal that the optimal latent feature representation varies depending on dataset characteristics, emphasizing the importance of a flexible evaluation framework.

Data and algorithms have the potential to produce and perpetuate discrimination and disparate treatment. As such, significant effort has been invested in developing approaches to defining, detecting, and eliminating unfair outcomes in algorithms. In this paper, we focus on performing statistical inference for fairness. Prior work in fairness inference has largely focused on inferring the fairness properties of a given predictive algorithm. Here, we expand fairness inference by evaluating fairness in the data generating process itself, referred to here as data fairness. We perform inference on data fairness using targeted learning, a flexible framework for nonparametric inference. We derive estimators demographic parity, equal opportunity, and conditional mutual information. Additionally, we find that our estimators for probabilistic metrics exploit double robustness. To validate our approach, we perform several simulations and apply our estimators to real data.

Statistical experiments often seek to identify random variables with the largest population means. This inferential task, known as rank verification, has been well-studied on Gaussian data with equal variances. This work provides the first treatment of the unequal variances case, utilizing ideas from the selective inference literature. We design a hypothesis test that verifies the rank of the largest observed value without losing power due to multiple testing corrections. This test is subsequently extended for two procedures: Identifying some number of correctly-ordered Gaussian means, and validating the top-K set. The testing procedures are validated on NHANES survey data.

Integral projection models (IPMs) are widely used to study population growth and the dynamics of demographic structure (e.g. age and size distributions) within a population.These models use data on individuals' growth, survival, and reproduction to predict changes in the population from one time point to the next and use these in turn to ask about long-term growth rates, the sensitivity of that growth rate to environmental factors, and aspects of the long term population such as how much reproduction concentrates in a few individuals; these quantities are not directly measurable from data and must be inferred from the model. Building IPMs requires us to develop models for individual fates over the next time step -- Did they survive? How much did they grow or shrink? Did they Reproduce? -- conditional on their initial state as well as on environmental covariates in a manner that accounts for the unobservable quantities that are are ultimately interested in estimating.Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) methods are particularly well-suited to a framework in which we are largely interested in the consequences of models. These build machine learning-based models that estimate the probability distribution of the data we observe and define a target of inference as a function of these. The initial estimate for the distribution is then modified by tilting in the direction of the efficient influence function to both de-bias the parameter estimate and provide more accurate inference. In this paper, we employ TMLE to develop robust and efficient estimators for properties derived from a fitted IPM. Mathematically, we derive the efficient influence function and formulate the paths for the least favorable sub-models. Empirically, we conduct extensive simulations using real data from both long term studies of Idaho steppe plant communities and experimental Rotifer populations.

Variable importance is one of the most widely used measures for interpreting machine learning with significant interest from both statistics and machine learning communities. Recently, increasing attention has been directed toward uncertainty quantification in these metrics. Current approaches largely rely on one-step procedures, which, while asymptotically efficient, can present higher sensitivity and instability in finite sample settings. To address these limitations, we propose a novel method by employing the targeted learning (TL) framework, designed to enhance robustness in inference for variable importance metrics. Our approach is particularly suited for conditional permutation variable importance. We show that it (i) retains the asymptotic efficiency of traditional methods, (ii) maintains comparable computational complexity, and (iii) delivers improved accuracy, especially in finite sample contexts. We further support these findings with numerical experiments that illustrate the practical advantages of our method and validate the theoretical results.

One strand of modern coexistence theory (MCT) partitions invader growth rates (IGR) to quantify how different mechanisms contribute to species coexistence, highlighting fluctuation‐dependent mechanisms. A general conclusion from the classical analytic MCT theory is that coexistence mechanisms relying on temporal variation (such as the temporal storage effect) are generally less effective at promoting coexistence than mechanisms relying on spatial or spatiotemporal variation (primarily growth‐density covariance). However, the analytic theory assumes continuous population density, and IGRs are calculated for infinitesimally rare invaders that have infinite time to find their preferred habitat and regrow, without ever experiencing intraspecific competition. Here we ask if the disparity between spatial and temporal mechanisms persists when individuals are, instead, discrete and occupy finite amounts of space. We present a simulation‐based approach to quantifying IGRs in this situation, building on our previous approach for spatially non‐varying habitats. As expected, we found that spatial mechanisms are weakened; unexpectedly, the contribution to IGR from growth‐density covariance could even become negative, opposing coexistence. We also found shifts in which demographic parameters had the largest effect on the strength of spatial coexistence mechanisms. Our substantive conclusions are statements about one model, across parameter ranges that we subjectively considered realistic. Using the methods developed here, effects of individual discreteness should be explored theoretically across a broader range of conditions, and in models parameterized from empirical data on real communities.

Multivariate random forests (or MVRFs) are an extension of tree-based ensembles to examine multivariate responses. MVRF can be particularly helpful where some of the responses exhibit sparse (e.g., zero-inflated) distributions, making borrowing strength from correlated features attractive. Tree-based algorithms select features using variable importance measures (VIMs) that score each covariate based on the strength of dependence of the model on that variable. In this paper, we develop and propose new VIMs for MVRFs. Specifically, we focus on the variable’s ability to achieve split improvement, i.e., the difference in the responses between the left and right nodes obtained after splitting the parent node, for a multivariate response. Our proposed VIMs are an improvement over the default naïve VIM in existing software and allow us to investigate the strength of dependence both globally and on a per-response basis. Our simulation studies show that our proposed VIM recovers the true predictors better than naïve measures. We demonstrate usage of the VIMs for variable selection in two empirical applications; the first is on Amazon Marketplace data to predict Buy Box prices of multiple brands in a category, and the second is on ecology data to predict co-occurrence of multiple, rare bird species. A feature of both data sets is that some outcomes are sparse — exhibiting a substantial proportion of zeros or fixed values. In both cases, the proposed VIMs when used for variable screening give superior predictive accuracy over naïve measures.

Model distillation has been a popular method for producing interpretable machine learning. It uses an interpretable “student” model to mimic the predictions made by the black box “teacher” model. However, when the student model is sensitive to the variability of the data sets used for training even when keeping the teacher fixed, the corresponded interpretation is not reliable. Existing strategies stabilize model distillation by checking whether a large enough sample of pseudo-data is generated to reliably reproduce student models, but methods to do so have so far been developed separately for each specific class of student model. In this paper, we develop a generic approach for stable model distillation based on central limit theorem for the estimated fidelity of the student to the teacher. We start with a collection of candidate student models and search for candidates that reasonably agree with the teacher. Then we construct a multiple testing framework to select a sample size such that the consistent student model would be selected under different pseudo samples. We demonstrate the application of our proposed approach on three commonly used intelligible models: decision trees, falling rule lists and symbolic regression. Finally, we conduct simulation experiments on Mammographic Mass and Breast Cancer datasets and illustrate the testing procedure throughout a theoretical analysis with Markov process. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/yunzhe-zhou/GenericDistillation.