Gerald F. Wieczorek’s research while affiliated with United States Geological Survey and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (52)


Figure 2. Photograph of Yosemite Valley looking east, showing the steep granitic cliffs that flank the valley. The cliff of El Capitan on the left side of the photo is approximately 915 m in height. Bridalveil Fall is in the centerright of the photo. Photo by Christine Loberg, used with permission.
Figure 4. Example format of "Master" sheet from the rock fall database. Only a small selection of the rock fall events and organizational categories are shown.
Figure 5. Example format of "Environmental Conditions" sheet from the rock fall database. Only a small selection of the rock fall events and organizational categories are shown.
Figure 7. Example format of the rock fall database narrative document. The narratives are accompanied by only the key information from the organizational categories included in the database.
Historical Rock Falls in Yosemite National Park, California (1857–2011)
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2013

·

1,662 Reads

·

35 Citations

USGS professional paper

Greg M. Stock

·

Brian D. Collins

·

David J. Santaniello

·

[...]

·

James B. Snyder

Full text and DATA at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/746/ Inventories of rock falls and other types of landslides are valuable tools for improving understanding of these events. For example, detailed information on rock falls is critical for identifying mechanisms that trigger rock falls, for quantifying the susceptibility of different cliffs to rock falls, and for developing magnitude-frequency relations. Further, inventories can assist in quantifying the relative hazard and risk posed by these events over both short and long time scales. This report describes and presents the accompanying rock fall inventory database for Yosemite National Park, California. The inventory database documents 925 events spanning the period 1857–2011. Rock falls, rock slides, and other forms of slope movement represent a serious natural hazard in Yosemite National Park. Rock-fall hazard and risk are particularly relevant in Yosemite Valley, where glacially steepened granitic cliffs approach 1 km in height and where the majority of the approximately 4 million yearly visitors to the park congregate. In addition to damaging roads, trails, and other facilities, rock falls and other slope movement events have killed 15 people and injured at least 85 people in the park since the first documented rock fall in 1857. The accompanying report describes each of the organizational categories in the database, including event location, type of slope movement, date, volume, relative size, probable trigger, impact to humans, narrative description, references, and environmental conditions. The inventory database itself is contained in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Yosemite_rock_fall_database_1857-2011.xlsx). Narrative descriptions of events are contained in the database, but are also provided in a more readable Adobe portable document format (pdf) file (Yosemite_rock_fall_database_narratives_1857-2011.pdf) available for download separate from the database.

Download

Reducing Landslide Hazards and Risk in the United States: The Role of the US Geological Survey

April 2012

·

39 Reads

·

2 Citations

IntroductionThe Role of the USGS in Landslide Hazard AssessmentInvestigation of Landslide ProcessesDevelopment of Landslide Hazard MapsPrediction and Warning of Landslide HazardsUtilization of Landslide Hazard InformationLandslide Educational Efforts of the USGS — Current and Future RolesFuture USGS Efforts for Reduction of Landslide Hazard and Risk



Table 1 . Joint systems in the Glacier Point region.
Fig. 3. Staircase Falls rock-fall detachment area, showing narrow projecting bedrock fin. 2003 and 2007 rock falls occurred from center-right side of fin. Floor of Yosemite Valley 555 m below is in upper right of photograph. Staircase Creek flows down left (southwest) side of fin before turning sharply right (northeast) around the base of fin to top of Staircase Falls.
Fig. 4. Photograph of Staircase Falls rock-fall detachment area taken 21 days after 26 December 2003 event, showing light colored joint-controlled detachment surfaces. Rock debris impacted snowcovered ledge immediately below source area, and then fell ∼745 m down joint-controlled ledges to Yosemite Valley floor. Note heavy dark drainage paths below detachment area indicating water flow through joints. Overhanging rectangular block in center left of photograph (marked by red arrow) fell during 9 June 2007 rock fall. (Photo by Dan Horner, NPS).
Fig. 5. Part of rock-fall deposit from 26 December 2003 Staircase Falls rock fall. 4 m 3 (11 metric tons) block landed ∼ 120 m beyond 
Fig. 8. Contour plots, rose diagrams, and trend and plunge data for joint surfaces at Staircase Falls rock fall detachment area (n=25) (see Table 1 for data). More joints exist than were measured.
Investigation and hazard assessment of the 2003 and 2007 Staircase Falls rock falls, Yosemite National Park, California, USA

May 2008

·

599 Reads

·

45 Citations

Since 1857 more than 600 rock falls, rock slides, debris slides, and debris flows have been documented in Yosemite National Park, with rock falls in Yosemite Valley representing the majority of the events. On 26 December 2003, a rock fall originating from west of Glacier Point sent approximately 200 m3 of rock debris down a series of joint-controlled ledges to the floor of Yosemite Valley. The debris impacted talus near the base of Staircase Falls, producing fragments of flying rock that struck occupied cabins in Curry Village. Several years later on 9 June 2007, and again on 26 July 2007, smaller rock falls originated from the same source area. The 26 December 2003 event coincided with a severe winter storm and was likely triggered by precipitation and/or frost wedging, but the 9 June and 26 July 2007 events lack recognizable triggering mechanisms. We investigated the geologic and hydrologic factors contributing to the Staircase Falls rock falls, including bedrock lithology, weathering, joint spacing and orientations, and hydrologic processes affecting slope stability. We improved upon previous geomorphic assessment of rock-fall hazards, based on a shadow angle approach, by using STONE, a three-dimensional rock-fall simulation computer program. STONE produced simulated rock-fall runout patterns similar to the mapped extent of the 2003 and 2007 events, allowing us to simulate potential future rock falls from the Staircase Falls detachment area. Observations of recent rock falls, mapping of rock debris, and simulations of rock fall runouts beneath the Staircase Falls detachment area suggest that rock-fall hazard zones extend farther downslope than the extent previously defined by mapped surface talus deposits.


A comparative analysis of simulated and observed landslide locations triggered by Hurricane Camille in Nelson County, Virginia

February 2008

·

22 Reads

·

11 Citations

Hydrological Processes

In 1969, Nelson County, Virginia received up to 71 cm of rain within 12 h starting at 7 p.m. on August 19. The total rainfall from the storm exceeded the 1000-year return period in the region. Several thousands of landslides were induced by rainfall associated with Hurricane Camille causing fatalities and destroying infrastructure. We apply a distributed transient response model for regional slope stability analysis to shallow landslides. Initiation points of over 3000 debris flows and effects of flooding from this storm are applied to the model. Geotechnical data used in the calculations are published data from samples of colluvium. Results from these calculations are compared with field observations such as landslide trigger location and timing of debris flows to assess how well the model predicts the spatial and temporal distribution of landslide initiation locations. The model predicts many of the initiation locations in areas where debris flows are observed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.




Fig. 5 Geologic map of the northern portion of Tidal Inlet (modified from Brew, written communication, 2002). Geologic units: Qs (surficial deposits), DSrt (Undivided Rendu and Tidal Formation Rocks), DSp (Pyramid Peak Limestone), and Stg (Tidal Formation). Topographic contours are with interval of 100 ft
Fig. 7 Eight snapshots of the tsunami propagation simulation. View to the northeast. Snapshot at t=0 min shows synthetic wave gauge station locations
Total movement of individual bench marks and 2σ uncertainty
Hazard assessment of the Tidal Inlet landslide and potential subsequent tsunami, Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

September 2007

·

178 Reads

·

36 Citations

Landslides

An unstable rock slump, estimated at 5 to 10 × 106m3, lies perched above the northern shore of Tidal Inlet in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. This landslide mass has the potential to rapidly move into Tidal Inlet and generate large, long-period-impulse tsunami waves. Field and photographic examination revealed that the landslide moved between 1892 and 1919 after the retreat of the Little Ice Age glaciers from Tidal Inlet in 1890. Global positioning system measurements over a 2-year period show that the perched mass is presently moving at 3–4cm annually indicating the landslide remains unstable. Numerical simulations of landslide-generated waves suggest that in the western arm of Glacier Bay, wave amplitudes would be greatest near the mouth of Tidal Inlet and slightly decrease with water depth according to Green’s law. As a function of time, wave amplitude would be greatest within approximately 40min of the landslide entering water, with significant wave activity continuing for potentially several hours.



Landslides caused by the M 7.6 Tecomán, Mexico earthquake of January 21, 2003

August 2006

·

472 Reads

·

55 Citations

Engineering Geology

The Tecomán, Mexico earthquake (also called the “Colima earthquake”) of January 21, 2003 (M 7.6) triggered several hundreds of landslides in the coastal cordilleras of Colima State, near the earthquake source, and several thousands in the volcanic highlands north and northwest of Colima City. These landslides, mostly shallow and disrupted failures, caused minor damage to roads, to a railroad, and to irrigation systems. In one area, extensive, post-earthquake rock-fall activity indicates a possible long-term instability that could threaten dwellings and other infrastructure located nearby. In the coastal cordilleras, most of the landslides were generated by failures of artificially cut slopes, especially along roads. The rocks of the coastal cordilleras are generally well indurated, and landslides occurred only where the rocks were made locally susceptible by weathering, the presence of prominent discontinuities with unfavorable orientations, or intense fracturing or shearing.In contrast to the coastal cordilleras, the volcanic rocks to the north were more susceptible to the occurrence of seismically triggered landslides. The greatest number and concentrations of landslides occurred there, and the landslides were larger than those in the coastal cordilleras, even though this volcanic terrain was farther from the earthquake source. Here, stretches of river bluffs several hundred meters long had been stripped of vegetation and surficial material by coalescing landslides, and several days after the main shock, thousands of small rock falls were still occurring each day, indicating an ongoing hazard. The high susceptibility of volcanic materials to earthquake-generated landslides conforms to findings in other recent earthquakes.


Citations (42)


... Determination of Liquefaction Susceptibility (Keefer and Wilson 1989), Determination of Critical Accelerations based on Susceptibility Categories (Keefer and Wilson 1989), Determination of area percentage of Map with a Landslide-Susceptible Deposit (Wieczorek et al. 2013), Determination of Permanent Ground Displacements. ...

Reference:

SEISMIC DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF LIFELINES BASED ON GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS
La Honda Landslide Test Area, San Mateo County, California
  • Citing Chapter
  • January 1989

... Interestingly, numerous scars occur on the scrublands that dominate undeveloped steep hillslopes; it is likely that scrubland root structures do not extend deep enough to prevent landslides that result from an intense rainfall event. Similarly, only in the 1983 model does surficial geology play a prominent role, when landslides were abundant on colluvium, likely initiated from pore pressure threshold exceedances during the 1982 ENSO year [51]. ...

Debris flows and other landslides in San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Contra Costa, Alameda, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Lake, and Yolo Counties, and factors influencing debris-flow distribution
  • Citing Article
  • January 1988

... This effect, together with the influences of the coupled seawater and deep reef topography, causes strong nonuniform motions on the reef site and significantly threatens the seismic safety of the artificial islands and upper constructions. Similar phenomena, but on land sites, have been observed: in the 1976 Guatemala earthquake, the researchers observed that the landslides were concentrated on one side of a ridge but not the other (Harp et al., 1981), and in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, some ridges experienced severe failure, while nearby cliffs were less affected . Therefore, to advance the understanding of the ground motion field distribution on the reef site and ensure the rationality of the seismic wave input in reef engineering, it is necessary to investigate the seismic response of the reef-seawater system under the obliquely incident seismic waves. ...

Landslides from the february 4 1976
  • Citing Article
  • January 1981

... The accuracy of warning can reach to 1 hr. Amongst these countries, the warning system by USA is the most representative [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Meanwhile, all the systems have the similar characters: (1) long time and perfect rainfall data; (2) advanced remote controlling, monitoring and transfer net for rainfall and landslides; (3) detailed landslide investigation data and hazard zonation work. ...

Landslide warning system in the San Francisco Bay Region
  • Citing Article
  • January 1990

... The landslide hazards and risk methods, which are difficult to predict, have evolved through many stages. These are based on landslide activity periods in 1900 and regional assessment of process development (Howe, 1909), landslide inventory mapping in 1940-1960 and application of regional hazard assessments (Jones, 1961), improvement and development of landslide classification systems (Cruden and Varnes, 1996), regional landslide susceptibility map (Brabb and Pampeyan, 1972) in the 1970s, landslide susceptibility map (Wieczorek et al., 1985) triggered by the earthquake triggered in the 1980s, watershed thresholds for triggering landslides (Glade et al., 2006;Guzzetti et al., 2003), the use of regional rock fall risk and hazard output models in the 2000s (Cannon and Ellen, 1985), 1990s GIS techniques debris flow model output (Glade et al., 2006;Iverson et al., 1998;Wieczorek et al., 2005) and thanks to the development of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (UA) technologies, quantitative approaches have gained more importance for larger areas. There has been a significant increase in the number of landslides and danger studies since the 1990s when developed GIS and UA. ...

Reducing Landslide Hazards and Risk in the United States: The Role of the US Geological Survey
  • Citing Article
  • April 2012

... from the top of the fragmentation areas (i.e., the major impact point) to the furthest farthest fragments for El Capitan, Novate Mezzola and Gallivaggio is 24.8 • , 22.2 • , and 19.0 • , respectively. Fig. 8 shows a comparison between H/L ratio values from the literature (Scheidegger, 1973;Corominas, 1996;Wieczorek et al., 1998;Copons et al., 2009;Massey et al., 2012;Ruiz-Carulla et al., 2018) and the values of this study. Overall, we observe that the H/L values follow the same general trend from the literature. ...

Rockfall hazards in the Yosemite Valley
  • Citing Article
  • January 1998

... They trigger numerous landslides along the wettest slopes of the SM range (Ramos Scharrón et al., 2012;Bucknam et al., 2001). Because SM range soils are more frequently close to water saturation, they are more likely to be affected by landslides when earthquakes strike the range (Harp et al., 1981). In the SM range, boulder armoring is common on the serpentinite mélanges that crop out up to high elevations along its southern flank, owing to the presence of knockers in the mélanges (e.g., Fig. 8c). ...

The Guatemala earthquake of February 4, 1976 - Landslides from the February 4, 1976, Guatemala earthquake
  • Citing Article
  • January 1981

... The present study included integrated geological and geophysical studies to detect a set of non-tectonic curve-planar fractures and joints cutting through debris deposits, and study the sliding potential along these mega-discontinuities. Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT), Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), Microtremors, and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) are the most commonly used and robust techniques to examine the geological hazard. ERT is a very helpful shallow geophysical techniques applicable in geo-hazards (landslides, sinkholes, and cavity) detection, in groundwater exploration, mining, landfill sites investigation, and in infrastructure assessment [2,15,18,25,40,58,88,102,104,107,113,117]. It is a new method of the traditional vertical electrical sounding and gives very high resolution images of the subsurface strata vertically and horizontally [49,77] by detecting the variation in their electrical conductivity (reciprocal of resistance) [77]. ...

Monitoring slope movements
  • Citing Article
  • January 2009

... In hyper-arid environment, with active tectonics, landslides are most probably triggered by earthquakes. Several rockfall and rock slides have been triggered during historic earthquakes in Sierra Nevada (Wieczorek and Jäger, 1996;Wieczorek et al., 1999Wieczorek et al., , 2000Wieczorek, 2002;Wieczorek and Snyder, 2004). In the dry Dead Sea fault, in the southern Israel, rockfalls are usually caused by shacking movement (Rinat et al., 2017). ...

Rockfall potential in the yosemite Valley California
  • Citing Article
  • January 1999