Geoffrey R. McCarney’s research while affiliated with University of Ottawa and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Big Ideas for Sustainable Prosperity: Policy Innovation for Greening Growth
  • Article

November 2016

·

65 Reads

·

1 Citation

Canadian Public Policy

·

Geoffrey R. McCarney


Assessing the implications of a carbon market for boreal forest management

June 2011

·

68 Reads

The Forestry Chronicle

Canada's forests -particularly the boreal-are a major storehouse of carbon. How they are managed could significantly affect Canada's greenhouse gas emissions while also presenting a new revenue source for forest managers. This study attempts to assess how a carbon price could affect forest management, particularly in Canada's boreal plains region. An integrated modelling approach is developed to incorporate both forest carbon and timber supply considerations within an optimal management framework. This modelling approach allows for consideration of alternative market and regulatory scenarios, along with a range of possible management intensity and harvest scheduling options over the landscape. The overall conclusion is that carbon incentives will increase the value of the boreal forest-potentially quite significantly- and will generally encourage management changes consistent with sustainable forest management practices.


Citations (1)


... This paper presents a model used for the determination of the optimal harvest age of a single forest stand in the tradition of Faustmann (1849) and Hartman (1976), with the inclusion of a price and a cost associated with the annual sequestration and emission of CO 2 . The general results reported here can be expected to differ from forest-level analyses such as those reported by McCarney (2007) and McCarney et al. (2008) because of the effect of inter-period flow constraints imposed on forest-level models. The results can also be expected to differ from those reported in other stand-level models (e.g. ...

Reference:

Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter
University of Alberta Management Decisions in the Boreal Forest Considering Timber and Carbon Market Incentives
  • Citing Article