Gennaro Chierchia’s research while affiliated with Harvard University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention
  • Book

July 2013

·

85 Reads

·

474 Citations

Gennaro Chierchia

This book explores the relation between language and logic through an analysis of polarity sensitivity and free choice effects. A wide variety of items are considered, with the intent of identifying the common core of the Polarity System as well as the choices that determine the stunningly diverse array of its manifestations. Sensitivity to polarity and freedom of choice are analyzed as a form of grammaticized Scalar Implicature. This requires a reassessment of how the different components of language (i.e. syntax, semantics and pragmatics) interact. But perhaps the most surprising outcome of t Logical Syntax of Language his book concers the relation of syntax to logic. In his classic, Carnap defines syntax as a lexicon and a set of formation rule and logic proper as a set of inference rules. Modern linguistics in the generative tradition has maintained a similar modular set up: a combinatorial apparatus generates structures over which semantic/pragmatic relations (like entailment, presuppositions and implicatures) are defined. This book argues that a wide array of structures that are typically perceived and analyzed as syntactically deviant owe in fact their status to their logical properties, i.e. whether they are contradictory/analytically true in specific ways (‘G-trivial’). This alters the Carnapian view, as the characterization of ‘grammatical structure’ now requires a more direct role of logical inferences. The functional lexicon of grammar comes with a set of inference rules that crucially and directly determine grammaticality patterns. Logic in Grammar presents the results of a decade’s work on semantics, pragmatics and syntax. It extends the author’s long-term project on how humans categorize the world and how they reason. It is, in sum, a mind-opening contribution to the understanding of the fundamental operations of language and thought, a book that will interest linguists, philosophers, and cognitive scientists alike.

Citations (1)


... Alice {Alice} who {Alice, Bob, Cara, ...} Subsequent work has motivated the use of such a one-dimensional Hamblin semantics framework for the analysis of wh-quantification (Shimoyama, 2001(Shimoyama, , 2006, negative polarity and free choice indefinites (Krifka, 1994;Kratzer & Shimoyama, 2002;Chierchia, 2006Chierchia, , 2013, and disjunction (Aloni, 2003;Simons, 2005;Alonso-Ovalle, 2006;Biezma & Rawlins, 2012). In contrast, Rooth's work on focus shows that it is necessary to distinguish a particular value for a focused constituent-the prejacent value-from its alternatives, which has led to an influential two-dimensional system dubbed Alternative Semantics. ...

Reference:

Focus intervention, multiple association, and the unity of focus and wh alternatives
Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention
  • Citing Book
  • July 2013