Gareth Evans’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All
  • Article

November 2009

·

551 Reads

·

485 Citations

Irish Studies in International Affairs

Gareth Evans

Never again! the world has vowed time and again since the Holocaust. Yet genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other mass atrocity crimes continue to shock our consciences --from the killing fields of Cambodia to the machetes of Rwanda to the agony of Darfur. Gareth Evans has grappled with these issues firsthand. As Australian foreign minister, he was a key broker of the United Nations peace plan for Cambodia. As president of the International Crisis Group, he now works on the prevention and resolution of scores of conflicts and crises worldwide. The primary architect of and leading authority on the Responsibility to Protect (""R2P""), he shows here how this new international norm can once and for all prevent a return to the killing fields. The Responsibility to Protect captures a simple and powerful idea. The primary responsibility for protecting its own people from mass atrocity crimes lies with the state itself. State sovereignty implies responsibility, not a license to kill. But when a state is unwilling or unable to halt or avert such crimes, the wider international community then has a collective responsibility to take whatever action is necessary. R2P emphasizes preventive action above all. That includes assistance for states struggling to contain potential crises and for effective rebuilding after a crisis or conflict to tackle its underlying causes. R2P's primary tools are persuasion and support, not military or other coercion. But sometimes it is right to fight: faced with another Rwanda, the world cannot just stand by. R2P was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly at the 2005 World Summit. But many misunderstandings persist about its scope and limits. And much remains to be done to solidify political support and to build institutional capacity. Evans shows, compellingly, how big a break R2P represents from the past, and how, with its acceptance in principle and effective application in practice, the promise of "Never again!" can at last become a reality.

Citations (1)


... The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine achieved its most straightforward presentation when the United Nations adopted it as an official doctrine in 2005. The United Nations established the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine during 2005 which declares the international community must intervene against states performing inadequate mass-atrocity protection (Evans, 2008). R2P gained international use in both the Libya (2011) and Syria (2012) situations yet faces ongoing debates about its application in conflicts involving Kashmir and Palestine because state officials oppose outside assessments they deem sovereign violations (Shakoor, 2024). ...

Reference:

State sovereignty vs. human rights: Amnesty International’s role in Kashmir and Palestine
The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All
  • Citing Article
  • November 2009

Irish Studies in International Affairs