G. J. van Norden’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (16)


Chapter 19: Financial Services
  • Chapter

May 2014

Ad van Doesum

·

Gert-Jan van Norden


The Right To Deduct under EU VAT The original conference paper can be accessed at http://www.box.net/shared/s13evqyo0gtc61t4i056.

September 2011

·

3 Reads

International VAT Monitor

In this article, the authors discuss the EU VAT law perspective on the right to deduct input VAT relating to taxed, exempt and/or non-taxable transactions. Their analysis starts from the hypothesis that, under EU VAT law, the right to deduct input VAT generally exists if taxable persons use goods and services for productive purposes. Several comments to the authors’ conference paper are contained in Peter Melz, "Activities outside the Scope of VAT and Exempt Activities" in International VAT Monitor 5 (2011).



Share Disposals and the Right of Deduction of Input VAT
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2010

·

53 Reads

·

2 Citations

EC Tax Review

The European Court of Justice (ECJ)’s ruling in the SKF case is a milestone in the development of the doctrine on the VAT treatment of disposals of shares by a ‘controlling active parent company’, such as AB SKF. The first question in this case was whether the disposal of shares was an economic activity and if so, whether it constituted a VAT exempt supply of services. The second question was whether input VAT incurred on costs made in connection to a share disposal can be deducted. Although the ECJ ruled that the disposal of the shares was a VAT exempt supply of services, the ECJ created routes to deduct input VAT on costs related to the disposal of the shares. Focusing on the right to deduction of input VAT, the authors investigate the implications of the ECJ’s judgment and test whether the EC VAT Directive (ECVD) and settled ECJ case law provide solid legal arguments to validate both the outcome and the implications of the SKF case.

Download






Citations (1)


... First, the transaction had to acquire a tax advantage that directly opposed the stated aims of both the Directive and the national implementing legislation, all while satisfying the formal criteria of both sets of regulations. Second, there needed to be objective proof to show that the major purpose of the transaction was to get a tax advantage (Reiniers et al., 2008). ...

Reference:

Proportionality Principle in the CJEU Judgments on Tax Cases
The new rules on the place of supply of services in European VAT

EC Tax Review