G. H. N. A. Sandanayake’s research while affiliated with Kaatsu International University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Characteristics of post toppling behaviour. (a) Camera trap captures of fence crossing males. Fence crossing by A Neraluwa gate, B fallen post, C stepping over the fence, D pulling post by the top section using the trunk, E crashing through wires, F and I pushing posts by the bottom section with forelegs, G and H pushing posts by the bottom and top sections respectively using the trunk. (b) Post toppling methods. (c) Parts of post used to pull and push. (d) Post toppling method in relation to body appendage used. (e) Section of post contacted by body in toppling posts.
Frequency of fence crossing vs time of day at the three locations (a–c). Red lines – elephants exiting, blue lines – elephants entering the park. Solid lines – modelled means, dashed lines – ±1SE. Circles indicate frequency of crossings per hour. (a) Neraluwa. (b) Pokunuthanna. (c) Southern fence.
How did the elephant cross the fence? Electric fence crossing by elephants in Udawalawe, Sri Lanka
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

September 2024

·

137 Reads

·

·

·

[...]

·

P. Fernando

Electric fences are widely used in human–elephant conflict mitigation. However, elephants constantly challenge and overcome fences, which is a growing concern. We studied how elephants crossed the perimeter electric fence around the Udawalawe National Park (UWNP), Sri Lanka. Using camera traps, we monitored 18 fence posts and an open gate in the fence over 605 days from 2016 to 2019. Photographs of 3097 fence crossings were analysed to obtain demographic data for fence crossing elephants, crossing methods, and the daily and seasonal timing of fence crossing. We identified 77 adult males and 12 adult females that crossed the fence, which represent about 17% of the adult elephants in UWNP. Most of the crossings were through the open gate at night. Elephants used a variety of crossing methods, comprised of crossing at the open gate, at previously toppled posts, by crashing through wires and stepping over wires, as well as by using the trunk or forefeet to topple posts. Fence voltage was not a determinant of fence crossing. The frequency and timing of fence crossings varied between locations with later exits and less time spent outside, at crossing points bordering human dominated areas. Our results emphasis on the importance of taking into account the problem solving abilities of elephants in fence design and location, such as energising fence posts and constructing exclosure fences at the boundaries of crop fields and settlements, in employing electric fences to mitigate human‐elephant conflict.

View access options