Franziska Boehm’s research while affiliated with University of Luxembourg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Towards Harmonised Data Protection Principles for Information Exchange at EU-level
  • Book

November 2012

·

329 Reads

·

73 Citations

Franziska Boehm

Privacy and data protection in police work and law enforcement cooperation has always been a challenging issue. Current developments in EU internal security policy, such as increased information sharing (which includes the exchange of personal data between European law enforcement agencies and judicial actors in the area of freedom, security and justice (Europol, Eurojust, Frontex and OLAF)) and the access of EU agencies, in particular Europol and Eurojust, to data stored in European information systems such as the SIS (II), VIS, CIS or Eurodac raise interesting questions regarding the balance between the rights of individuals and security interests. This book deals with the complexity of the relations between these actors and offers for the first time a comprehensive overview of the structures for information exchange in the area of freedom, security and justice and their compliance with data protection rules in this field. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012. All rights are reserved.

Citations (1)


... Another crucial example is "vertical mixity", an expression that points at international agreements split between EU substantive regulation and Member State implementation, which is fictitious according to García Andrade: "since the treaty-making power is a normative power, the Union will be entitled to conclude these agreements alone, either for being a field of exclusive EU competence in the case of short-term visas, or a concurrent competence that the EU may exercise in the case of readmissions" (2019: 45 Before the Treaty of Lisbon was adopted, the European Community lacked a legal basis that it could have relied upon to legislate in the field of personal data. This gap did not prevent it from regulating the matter and data protection rules were provided for in both intergovernmental 33 and supranational instruments 34 , given that the justice and home affairs area is the prominent example of a sectorial-patchworked regulation (Boehm, 2012 (Liñán Nogueras, 1996: 13-16;2001: 374;2020: 126). Thus, the proposed legislation on the protection of personal data was smartly designed under the logic of trade liberalisation among Member States (Lynskey, 2015: 47-48). ...

Reference:

The European Union’s external competence in the data protection field: Is mixity the only way out?
Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Towards Harmonised Data Protection Principles for Information Exchange at EU-level
  • Citing Book
  • November 2012