Federico Quin’s research while affiliated with KU Leuven and other places

Despite considerable research efforts on handling uncertainty in self-adaptive systems, a comprehensive understanding of the precise nature of uncertainty is still lacking. This paper summarises the findings of the 2023 Bertinoro Seminar on Uncertainty in Self- Adaptive Systems, which aimed at thoroughly investigating the notion of uncertainty, and outlining open challenges associated with its handling in self-adaptive systems. The seminar discussions were centered around five core topics: (1) agile end-toend handling of uncertainties in goal-oriented self-adaptive systems, (2) managing uncertainty risks for self-adaptive systems, (3) uncertainty propagation and interaction, (4) uncertainty in self-adaptive machine learning systems, and (5) human empowerment under uncertainty. Building on the insights from these discussions, we propose a research agenda listing key open challenges, and a possible way forward for addressing them in the coming years.

In A/B testing two variants of a piece of software are compared in the field from an end user's point of view, enabling data-driven decision making. While widely used in practice, no comprehensive study has been conducted on the state-of-the-art in A/B testing. This paper reports the results of a systematic literature review that analyzed 141 primary studies. The results shows that the main targets of A/B testing are algorithms and visual elements. Single classic A/B tests are the dominating type of tests. Stakeholders have three main roles in the design of A/B tests: concept designer, experiment architect, and setup technician. The primary types of data collected during the execution of A/B tests are product/system data and user-centric data. The dominating use of the test results are feature selection, feature rollout, and continued feature development. Stakeholders have two main roles during A/B test execution: experiment coordinator and experiment assessor. The main reported open problems are enhancement of proposed approaches and their usability. Interesting lines for future research include: strengthen the adoption of statistical methods in A/B testing, improving the process of A/B testing, and enhancing the automation of A/B testing.

Modern software systems often have to cope with uncertain operation conditions, such as changing workloads or fluctuating interference in a wireless network. To ensure that these systems meet their goals these uncertainties have to be mitigated. One approach to realize this is self-adaptation that equips a system with a feedback loop. The feedback loop implements four core functions -- monitor, analyze, plan, and execute -- that share knowledge in the form of runtime models. For systems with a large number of adaptation options, i.e., large adaptation spaces, deciding which option to select for adaptation may be time consuming or even infeasible within the available time window to make an adaptation decision. This is particularly the case when rigorous analysis techniques are used to select adaptation options, such as formal verification at runtime, which is widely adopted. One technique to deal with the analysis of a large number of adaptation options is reducing the adaptation space using machine learning. State of the art has showed the effectiveness of this technique, yet, a systematic solution that is able to handle different types of goals is lacking. In this paper, we present ML2ASR+, short for Machine Learning to Adaptation Space Reduction Plus. Central to ML2ASR+ is a configurable machine learning pipeline that supports effective analysis of large adaptation spaces for threshold, optimization, and setpoint goals. We evaluate ML2ASR+ for two applications with different sizes of adaptation spaces: an Internet-of-Things application and a service-based system. The results demonstrate that ML2ASR+ can be applied to deal with different types of goals and is able to reduce the adaptation space and hence the time to make adaptation decisions with over 90%, with negligible effect on the realization of the adaptation goals.

A/B testing is a common approach used in industry to facilitate innovation through the introduction of new features or the modification of existing software. Traditionally, A/B tests are conducted sequentially, with each experiment targeting the entire population of the corresponding application. This approach can be time-consuming and costly, particularly when the experiments are not relevant to the entire population. To tackle these problems, we introduce a new self-adaptive approach called AutoPABS, short for Automated Pipelines of A/B tests using Self-adaptation, that (1) automates the execution of pipelines of A/B tests, and (2) supports a split of the population in the pipeline to divide the population into multiple A/B tests according to user-based criteria, leveraging machine learning. We started the evaluation with a small survey to probe the appraisal of the notation and infrastructure of AutoPABS. Then we performed a series of tests to measure the gains obtained by applying a population split in an automated A/B testing pipeline, using an extension of the SEAByTE artifact. The survey results show that the participants express the usefulness of automating A/B testing pipelines and population split. The tests show that automatically executing pipelines of A/B tests with a population split accelerates the identification of statistically significant results of the parallel executed experiments of A/B tests compared to a traditional approach that performs the experiments sequentially.

Artifacts support evaluating new research results and help comparing them with the state of the art in a field of interest. Over the past years, several artifacts have been introduced to support research in the field of self-adaptive systems. While these artifacts have shown their value, it is not clear to what extent these artifacts support research on problems in self-adaptation that are relevant to industry. This paper provides a set of guidelines for artifacts that aim at supporting industry-relevant research on selfadaptation. The guidelines that are grounded on data obtained from a survey with practitioners were derived during working sessions at the 17th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. Artifact providers can use the guidelines for aligning future artifacts with industry needs; they can also be used to evaluate the industrial relevance of existing artifacts. We also propose an artifact template.

Many software systems today face uncertain operating conditions, such as sudden changes in the availability of resources or unexpected user behavior. Without proper mitigation these uncertainties can jeopardize the system goals. Self-adaptation is a common approach to tackle such uncertainties. When the system goals may be compromised, the self-adaptive system has to select the best adaptation option to reconfigure by analyzing the possible adaptation options, i.e., the adaptation space. Yet, analyzing large adaptation spaces using rigorous methods can be resource- and time-consuming, or even be infeasible. One approach to tackle this problem is by using online machine learning to reduce adaptation spaces. However, existing approaches require domain expertise to perform feature engineering to define the learner, and support online adaptation space reduction only for specific goals. To tackle these limitations, we present ”Deep Learning for Adaptation Space Reduction Plus” – DLASeR+ in short. DLASeR+ offers an extendable learning framework for online adaptation space reduction that does not require feature engineering, while supporting three common types of adaptation goals: threshold, optimization, and set-point goals. We evaluate DLASeR+ on two instances of an Internet-of-Things application with increasing sizes of adaptation spaces for different combinations of adaptation goals. We compare DLASeR+ with a baseline that applies exhaustive analysis and two state-of-the-art approaches for adaptation space reduction that rely on learning. Results show that DLASeR+ is effective with a negligible effect on the realization of the adaptation goals compared to an exhaustive analysis approach, and supports three common types of adaptation goals beyond the state-of-the-art approaches.

Artifacts support evaluating new research results and help comparing them with the state of the art in a field of interest. Over the past years, several artifacts have been introduced to support research in the field of self-adaptive systems. While these artifacts have shown their value, it is not clear to what extent these artifacts support research on problems in self-adaptation that are relevant to industry. This paper provides a set of guidelines for artifacts that aim at supporting industry-relevant research on self-adaptation. The guidelines that are grounded on data obtained from a survey with practitioners were derived during working sessions at the 17th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. Artifact providers can use the guidelines for aligning future artifacts with industry needs; they can also be used to evaluate the industrial relevance of existing artifacts. We also propose an artifact template.