F.K. Reilly III’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Visualizing the Sacred: Cosmic visions, regionalism, and the art of the mississippian world
  • Article

January 2011

·

106 Reads

·

31 Citations

F.K. Reilly III

·

J.F. Garber

·

G.E. Lankford

The prehistoric native peoples of the Mississippi River Valley and other areas of the Eastern Woodlands of the United States shared a complex set of symbols and motifs that constituted one of the greatest artistic traditions of the pre-Columbian Americas. Traditionally known as the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex, these artifacts of copper, shell, stone, clay, and wood were the subject of the groundbreaking 2007 book Ancient Objects and Sacred Realms: Interpretations of Mississippian Iconography, which presented a major reconstruction of the rituals, cosmology, ideology, and political structures of the Mississippian peoples. Visualizing the Sacred advances the study of Mississippian iconography by delving into the regional variations within what is now known as the Mississippian Iconographic Interaction Sphere (MIIS). Bringing archaeological, ethnographic, ethnohistoric, and iconographic perspectives to the analysis of Mississippian art, contributors from several disciplines discuss variations in symbols and motifs among major sites and regions across a wide span of time and also consider what visual symbols reveal about elite status in diverse political environments. These findings represent the first formal identification of style regions within the Mississippian Iconographic Interaction Sphere and call for a new understanding of the MIIS as a network of localized, yet interrelated religious systems that experienced both continuity and change over time.


Citations (2)


... The relationship between religious practice-seen here as any activity in which individuals become entangled with or experience powerful places or objects, animate beings or powers, and/or otherworldly dimensions (see Baires 2017;Baltus 2018;Koldehoff and Pauketat 2018; Pauketat 2013a)-and special objects, accoutrements, and regalia made from exotic materials is evident throughout the Mississippian world. Archaeologists have long recognized that members of religious groups or cults used seemingly nonutilitarian items bearing so-called Southern Cult (variously deemed the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex or Mississippian Iconographic Interaction Sphere) motifs and symbols (Brown 1976;Galloway 1989;King 2007;Lankford et al. 2011;Reilly 2004;Reilly and Garber 2007;Waring and Holder 1945). Some studies have focused on how these accoutrements were produced, used, and experienced in religious contexts and activities (Baires 2016(Baires , 2017Brown 1997;Emerson 1989;Kelly 2006;Knight 1986;Marceaux and Dye 2007;Pauketat and Emerson 1991;Pauketat and Koldehoff 2002;Reilly 2004Steponaitis 2016;Steponaitis and Knight 2004;Wilson 1999). ...

Reference:

Skilled crafting at Cahokia's Fingerhut Tract
Visualizing the Sacred: Cosmic visions, regionalism, and the art of the mississippian world
  • Citing Article
  • January 2011

... The relationship between religious practice-seen here as any activity in which individuals become entangled with or experience powerful places or objects, animate beings or powers, and/or otherworldly dimensions (see Baires 2017;Baltus 2018;Koldehoff and Pauketat 2018; Pauketat 2013a)-and special objects, accoutrements, and regalia made from exotic materials is evident throughout the Mississippian world. Archaeologists have long recognized that members of religious groups or cults used seemingly nonutilitarian items bearing so-called Southern Cult (variously deemed the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex or Mississippian Iconographic Interaction Sphere) motifs and symbols (Brown 1976;Galloway 1989;King 2007;Lankford et al. 2011;Reilly 2004;Reilly and Garber 2007;Waring and Holder 1945). Some studies have focused on how these accoutrements were produced, used, and experienced in religious contexts and activities (Baires 2016(Baires , 2017Brown 1997;Emerson 1989;Kelly 2006;Knight 1986;Marceaux and Dye 2007;Pauketat and Emerson 1991;Pauketat and Koldehoff 2002;Reilly 2004Steponaitis 2016;Steponaitis and Knight 2004;Wilson 1999). ...

Ancient objects and sacred realms: Interpretations of mississippian iconography
  • Citing Article
  • January 2007